Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 13, 2005

Stroke. 2005
Published online before print October 13, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/11/2493    most recent
01.STR.0000185928.90848.2ev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uswatte, G.
Right arrow Articles by McCulloch, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uswatte, G.
Right arrow Articles by McCulloch, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Exercise testing
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke

Submitted on July 22, 2005
Accepted on August 15, 2005

Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use

Gitendra Uswatte PhD*; Edward Taub PhD; David Morris PhD, MSPT; Mary Vignolo BS; and Karen McCulloch PhD, PT, NCS

From the Department of Psychology (G.U., E.T., M.V.) and the Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Related Professions (D.M.), University of Alabama at Birmingham; and the Division of Physical Therapy (K.M.), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: guswatte{at}uab.edu.

Background and Purpose--In research on Constraint-Induced Movement (CI) therapy, a structured interview, the Motor Activity Log (MAL), is used to assess how stroke survivors use their more-impaired arm outside the laboratory. This article examines the psychometrics of the 14-item version of this instrument in 2 chronic stroke samples with mild-to-moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis.

Methods--Participants (n=41) in the first study completed MALs before and after CI therapy or a placebo control procedure. In addition, caregivers independently completed a MAL on the participants. Participants (n=27) in the second study completed MALs and wore accelerometers that monitored their arm movements for 3 days outside the laboratory before and after an automated form of CI therapy.

Results--Validity of the participant MAL Quality of Movement (QOM) scale was supported. Correlations between pretreatment-to-posttreatment change scores on the participant QOM scale and caregiver MAL QOM scale, caregiver MAL amount of use (AOU) scale, and accelerometer recordings were 0.70, 0.73, and 0.91 (P<0.01), respectively. Internal consistency ({alpha}>0.81), test-retest reliability (r>0.91), stability, and responsiveness (ratio >3) of the participant QOM scale were also supported. The participant AOU and caregiver QOM and AOU scales were internally consistent, stable, and sensitive, but were not reliable.

Conclusions--The participant MAL QOM scale can be used exclusively to reliably and validly measure real-world, upper-extremity rehabilitation outcome and functional status in chronic stroke patients with mild-to-moderate hemiparesis.


Key words: arm • function • rehabilitation • treatment outcome • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. Langan and P. van Donkelaar
The Influence of Hand Dominance on the Response to a Constraint-Induced Therapy Program Following Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 298 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Dahl, T. Askim, R. Stock, E. Langorgen, S. Lydersen, and B. Indredavik
Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 436 - 447.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. L Wolf
On "Modified constraint-induced therapy..." Page et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333-340.
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 680 - 684.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. Page and P. Levine
Author Response
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 684 - 688.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
K.-C. Lin, C.-Y. Wu, T.-H. Wei, C. Gung, C.-Y. Lee, and J.-S. Liu
Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2007; 21(12): 1075 - 1086.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. G. Lindberg, P. H. B. Skejo, E. Rounis, Z. Nagy, C. Schmitz, H. Wernegren, A. Bring, M. Engardt, H. Forssberg, and J. Borg
Wallerian Degeneration of the Corticofugal Tracts in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study Relating Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, and Hand Function
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 551 - 560.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. N. McDonnell, S. L. Hillier, T. S. Miles, P. D. Thompson, and M. C. Ridding
Influence of Combined Afferent Stimulation and Task-Specific Training Following Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 435 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. J Butler and S. L Wolf
Putting the Brain on the Map: Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Assess and Induce Cortical Plasticity of Upper-Extremity Movement
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 719 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. L Fritz, S. Z George, S. L Wolf, and K. E Light
Participant Perception of Recovery as Criterion to Establish Importance of Improvement for Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Outcome Measures: A Preliminary Study
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2007; 87(2): 170 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
C. Boake, E. A. Noser, T. Ro, S. Baraniuk, M. Gaber, R. Johnson, E. T. Salmeron, T. M. Tran, J. M. Lai, E. Taub, et al.
Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Early Stroke Rehabilitation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 14 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. Richards, L. J Gonzalez Rothi, S. Davis, S. S Wu, and S. E Nadeau
Limited dose response to Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in patients with chronic stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2006; 20(12): 1066 - 1074.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, C. Giuliani, K. E. Light, D. Nichols-Larsen, and for the EXCITE Investigators
Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.
JAMA, November 1, 2006; 296(17): 2095 - 2104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. Blanton, D. M Morris, M. G Prettyman, K. McCulloch, S. Redmond, K. E Light, and S. L Wolf
Lessons Learned in Participant Recruitment and Retention: The EXCITE Trial
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2006; 86(11): 1520 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, K. Light, and P. A. Thompson
The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke.
Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1189 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. K. King, D. Morris, J. E. Crago, and A. Chatterjee
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity After Stroke
Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1045 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]