on April 27, 2006
Published online before print April 27, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221281.69373.4e
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on December 8, 2005
From the Laboratory of Motor Behavior and Neurorehabilitation (Y.D., C.J.W.), Department of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (C.J.W.), Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California; Department of Neurology (B.H.D., A.D.W.), University of California Los Angeles; and Biostatistics Division (S.Y.C.), Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: winstein{at}usc.edu.
Background and Purpose--Functional brain imaging after stroke offers insight into motor network adaptations. This exploratory study examined whether motor cortical activation captured during arm-focused therapy can predict paretic hand functional gains. Methods--Eight hemiparetic patients had serial functional MRI (fMRI) while performing a pinch task before, midway, and after 2 weeks of constraint-induced therapy. The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was performed before and after intervention. Results--There was a linear reduction in ipsilateral (contralesional) primary motor (M1) activation (voxel counts) across time. The midpoint M1 Laterality Index anticipated post-therapeutic change in time to perform the WMFT. The change in ipsilateral M1 voxel count (pre- to mid-) correlated with the change in mean WMFT time (pre- to post-). Conclusions--The relationship between brain activation during treatment and functional gains suggests a use for serial fMRI in predicting the success and optimal duration for a focused therapeutic intervention.
Revised on January 31, 2006
Accepted on March 8, 2006
Motor Cortex Activation During Treatment May Predict Therapeutic Gains in Paretic Hand Function After Stroke
Yun Dong MD, PhD;
Key words: magnetic resonance imaging • rehabilitation
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  C. Enzinger, H. Dawes, H. Johansen-Berg, D. Wade, M. Bogdanovic, J. Collett, C. Guy, U. Kischka, S. Ropele, F. Fazekas, et al. Brain Activity Changes Associated With Treadmill Training After Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2460 - 2467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. F. Levin, J. A. Kleim, and S. L. Wolf What Do Motor "Recovery" and "Compensation" Mean in Patients Following Stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 313 - 319. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. H. Dobkin Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Cramer Use of Imaging in Restorative Stroke Trials Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3_suppl_1): S28 - S29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Malouin, C. L. Richards, A. Durand, and J. Doyon Clinical Assessment of Motor Imagery After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2008; 22(4): 330 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Manganotti, M. Acler, G. P. Zanette, N. Smania, and A. Fiaschi Motor Cortical Disinhibition During Early and Late Recovery After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2008; 22(4): 396 - 403. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. de Bode, G. W. Mathern, S. Bookheimer, and B. Dobkin Locomotor Training Remodels fMRI Sensorimotor Cortical Activations in Children After Cerebral Hemispherectomy Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 497 - 508. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Dong, C. J. Winstein, R. Albistegui-DuBois, and B. H. Dobkin Evolution of fMRI Activation in the Perilesional Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellum With Rehabilitation Training-Related Motor Gains After Stroke: A Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 412 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L Wolf Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1212 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Cramer, T. B. Parrish, R. M. Levy, G. T. Stebbins, S. D. Ruland, D. W. Lowry, T. P. Trouard, S. W. Squire, M. E. Weinand, C. R. Savage, et al. Predicting Functional Gains in a Stroke Trial Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2108 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Cramer The EXCITE Trial: A Major Step Forward for Restorative Therapies in Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2204 - 2205. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A Boyd, E. D Vidoni, and J. J Daly Answering the Call: The Influence of Neuroimaging and Electrophysiological Evidence on Rehabilitation Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 684 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Carey, W. K. Durfee, E. Bhatt, A. Nagpal, S. A. Weinstein, K. M. Anderson, and S. M. Lewis Comparison of Finger Tracking Versus Simple Movement Training via Telerehabilitation to Alter Hand Function and Cortical Reorganization After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2007; 21(3): 216 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. H. Dobkin Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation J. Physiol., March 15, 2007; 579(3): 637 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. H. Dobkin Behavioral, Temporal, and Spatial Targets for Cellular Transplants as Adjuncts to Rehabilitation for Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 832 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. H. Dobkin Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, C. Giuliani, K. E. Light, D. Nichols-Larsen, and for the EXCITE Investigators Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, November 1, 2006; 296(17): 2095 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|