Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1970;1:205-218

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHAPIRO, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by REIVICH, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHAPIRO, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by REIVICH, M.

(Stroke. 1970;1:205.)
© 1970 American Heart Association, Inc.


Direct Thermometry, Ophthalmodynamometry, Auscultation and Palpation in Extracranial Cerebrovascular Disease: An Evaluation of Rapid Diagnostic Methods

HARVEY M. SHAPIRO M.D.1; LAWRENCE NG M.D.1; MARK MISHKIN M.D.1; MARTIN REIVICH M.D.1

1 Departments of Neurology, Radiology, and Surgery of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

The ability of four rapid diagnostic tests—direct thermometry, ophthalmodynamometry, and bruit and pulse assessment—to discriminate for the presence or absence of significant extracranial cerebrovascular disease is examined. Utilized separately thermometry, ophthalmodynamometry and the examination for a bruit will find over 75% to 85% of cases. Pulse assessment alone reveals only 40% of significant lesions. The combination of neck examination for the presence of a bruit or pulse deficit alone will discover 93% of the vascular lesions. In the present series 100% of cases were found by including either direct thermometry or ophthalmodynamometry in combination with the aforementioned two tests.

Ophthalmodynamometry accurately located the side of the major lesion in more than 90% of the cases. The direct thermometry technique scored below 40% in lesion localization. It is suggested that the thermometry technique, because of the ease of its performance, should be utilized in combination with the neck examination as the preliminary step in assessing patients with suspected extracranial cerebrovascular disease. Ophthalmodynamometry should then be used for more accurate localization of the lesion prior to angiography.


Key Words: carotid • cerebral blood flow • ophthalmic artery • supraorbital artery • screening tests • lesion localization