Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harder, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kampine, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harder, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kampine, J. P.

Stroke, Vol 16, 680-683, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Cellular actions of halothane on cat cerebral arterial muscle

DR Harder, K Gradall, JA Madden and JP Kampine

The effects of halothane on intracellular membrane potential (Em) and force development in cat MCA were studied. Halothane (0.07-0.14 mM/1) relaxed isolated MCA which had developed myogenic tone. Measurement of Em showed that halothane depolarized this preparation in a dose- dependent fashion in the face of vessel relaxation, demonstrating uncoupling of electrical and mechanical activity. Halothane markedly inhibited the contractile effects of histamine and serotonin suggesting that, apart from its direct action on cerebral arterial tone, it also blunts the action of vasoactive agents. When this preparation is partially depolarized from -62 to -50 mV with excess K+, halothane, while having only a small (1.2 mV) additional depolarizing effect, consistently elicits contraction rather than relaxation. Thus, the action of this particular volatile anesthetic on cerebral arteries can depend upon the resting level of Em. These studies indicate that halothane relaxes myogenic tone in cat MCA by an intracellular mechanism, but that the direction of its effect (i.e., relaxation vs. contraction) may depend upon the prior level of Em and muscle cell activation.