Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benetos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Safar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benetos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Safar, M.

Stroke, Vol 16, 969-972, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Pulsed Doppler: an evaluation of diameter, blood velocity and blood flow of the common carotid artery in patients with isolated unilateral stenosis of the internal carotid artery

A Benetos, A Simon, J Levenson, P Lagneau, J Bouthier and M Safar

Arterial diameter, blood velocity and blood flow of both common carotid arteries were studied in 24 patients with isolated unilateral internal carotid artery stenosis, without any other significant lesion of the carotid system. The methodology used a pulsed Doppler system with two original characteristics: an adjustable range-gated system and a double transducer probe enabling both the arterial diameter and blood velocity to be evaluated. On the involved side, the diameter, the blood velocity and the blood flow were significantly reduced (p less than 0.001) in comparison with the opposite side. The degree of the internal carotid artery stenosis judged on arteriography was negatively correlated with (i) the blood flow of the common carotid artery homolateral to the stenosis (r = -0.78, p less than 0.001); and (ii) the ratio of the common carotid artery blood flow between the involved and the opposite side (r = -0.80, p less than 0.001). The proposed quantitative evaluation can be suitable for the detection and for the follow up of patients with stenosis of the internal carotid artery who do not have any other lesion of the carotid system.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. Vicenzini, M. C. Ricciardi, F. Puccinelli, M. Altieri, N. Vanacore, V. Di Piero, and G. L. Lenzi
Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness Determinants in a Population Study
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2007; 26(4): 427 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Y. Jiang, K. Kohara, and K. Hiwada
Association Between Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis and Mechanical Forces in Carotid Artery
Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2319 - 2324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T.-H. Lee, S.-J. Ryu, S.-T. Chen, and J.-L. Chan
Carotid Ultrasonographic Findings in Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion
Angiology, August 1, 1993; 44(8): 607 - 613.
[Abstract] [PDF]