Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujiwara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zuccarello, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujiwara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zuccarello, M.

Stroke, Vol 17, 312-317, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Presynaptic inhibitory action of adenosine on neuromuscular transmission in the canine cavernous carotid artery

S Fujiwara, NF Kassell, T Sasaki, M Yamashita and M Zuccarello

We investigated the effect of adenosine on neurogenic contraction of the canine cavernous carotid artery, using an isometric tension recording device and transmural nerve stimulation. Adenosine, in concentrations under 10(-5)M, had no relaxing effect on the contractions produced by high [K]o solution or 10(-5)M norepinephrine. Transmural nerve stimulation (stimulus: 1 msec duration, 100V intensity) evoked a frequency-dependent contraction, which was abolished by 3 X 10(-7)M tetrodotoxin. Adenosine in concentrations of 10(-6)M and 10(-5)M, inhibited the neurogenic contraction at each frequency, more so in the low frequency range. This inhibitory effect of adenosine was significantly antagonized by 10(-5)M theophylline. Pretreatment with 2 X 10(-8)M dipyridamole had no effect on neurogenic contractions, but augmented the inhibitory effect of adenosine. 10(-5)M theophylline did not augment the neurogenic contractions. The findings that both dipyridamole and theophylline failed to affect the neurogenic contractions in the absence of adenosine suggests that the presynaptic autoinhibition mechanism of adenosine may not be involved in neuromuscular transmission in this tissue. These results suggest that there is a presynaptic adenosine receptor in the nerve terminal which inhibits the release of neurotransmitter in canine cavernous carotid artery. It is also probable that the vasodilating effect of adenosine in the cavernous carotid artery is mainly due to its inhibitory effect on neurotransmission rather than to a direct relaxing effect on smooth muscle.