Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vibulsresth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vibulsresth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, M. D.

Stroke, Vol 18, 210-216, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Failure of nimodipine to prevent ischemic neuronal damage in rats

S Vibulsresth, WD Dietrich, R Busto and MD Ginsberg

The efficacy of nimodipine in preventing ischemic brain injury was tested in rats subjected to a 20-minute period of high-grade forebrain ischemia by 4-vessel occlusion. Three minutes after restoration of circulation to the brain, an intravenous bolus of 5 micrograms/kg nimodipine or an equivalent amount of vehicle or saline was given, followed by continuous intravenous infusion of the respective solution at 1 microgram/kg/min for 2 hours. In a second series, a larger bolus (20 micrograms/kg of nimodipine) and longer infusion period (6 hours) were employed. Histopathology of the brain was evaluated blindly 72 hours later and graded on a conventional 3-point scale. There was no significant effect of treatment in either series. In the 6-hour series, the percent of cerebral hemispheres showing damage of Grades 2 or 3 in zone CA1 of the hippocampus and in the striatum, respectively, was 100 and 40% for the nimodipine-treated rats, 100 and 42% for rats receiving vehicle, and 75 and 25% for animals receiving saline. Thus, this study revealed no beneficial effect of nimodipine when given following a 20- minute period of severe forebrain ischemia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
G. H. Danton and W. D. Dietrich
The Search for Neuroprotective Strategies in Stroke
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 181 - 194.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. Tatlisumak, K. Takano, R. A. D. Carano, L. P. Miller, A. C. Foster, M. Fisher, C. Y. Hsu, and W. Lin
Delayed Treatment With an Adenosine Kinase Inhibitor, GP683, Attenuates Infarct Size in Rats With Temporary Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion • Editorial Comment
Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1952 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. M. Roda, F. Carceller, E. Diez-Tejedor, and C. Avendano
Reduction of Infarct Size by Intra-Arterial Nimodipine Administered at Reperfusion in a Rat Model of Partially Reversible Brain Focal Ischemia
Stroke, October 1, 1995; 26(10): 1888 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
V. S. Miller
Topical Review Article: Pharmacologic Management of Neonatal Cerebral Ischemia and Hemorrhage: Old and New Directions
J Child Neurol, January 1, 1993; 8(1): 7 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
L. B. Goldstein
Pharmacologic Modulation of Recovery After Stroke: Clinical Data
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1991; 5(1-2): 129 - 140.
[PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
K. Maiese and J. J. Caronna
Coma Following Cardiac Arrest: A Review of the Clinical Features, Management, and Prognosis
J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 1988; 3(3): 153 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]