Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1988;19:1485-1490

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gumerlock, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Neuwelt, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gumerlock, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Neuwelt, E. A.

Stroke, Vol 19, 1485-1490, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Carotid endarterectomy: to shunt or not to shunt

MK Gumerlock and EA Neuwelt
Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

Because of controversies in the cerebrovascular literature regarding the use of an intraluminal shunt in carotid endarterectomy, we report a randomized prospective study of 118 consecutive symptomatic patients receiving surgery within a single neurosurgical practice. Over 4 years, 138 carotid endarterectomies were performed in the 118 patients, 63 operations with intraluminal shunting and 75 without. Standard rationale for surgery included ipsilateral cerebral infarction in 38% of the operations and ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks in 36%. Unilateral angiographic stenosis of greater than 90% was seen in 58% of the operations; there were no ipsilateral occlusions. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia with barbiturate induction and mild blood pressure elevation. The 30-day complication rate included a mortality rate of 0.7% with a 5.1% incidence of postoperative neurologic deficit and a 1.4% rate of myocardial infarction. In the 24 hours after surgery there were no cerebral infarctions in the shunted group and six in the unshunted group. This 8% rate in the unshunted group compared with 0% in the shunted group was significant at p = 0.023 with a power of 0.95 by Fisher's exact test and chi 2 analysis. This suggests that in our neurosurgical practice (resident training program) the use of an intraluminal shunt during carotid endarterectomy significantly reduces the risk of intraoperative neurologic deficit without increasing the incidence of other complications.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. J. Howell
Carotid endarterectomy
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2007; 99(1): 119 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Bond, K. Rerkasem, and P. M. Rothwell
Routine or Selective Carotid Artery Shunting for Carotid Endarterectomy (and Different Methods of Monitoring in Selective Shunting)
Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 824 - 825.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P.M. Rothwell, J. Slattery, and C.P. Warlow
A Systematic Review of the Risks of Stroke and Death Due to Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, February 1, 1996; 27(2): 260 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text]