Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, T. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Arm Injuries and Disorders
*Paralysis

Stroke, Vol 21, 247-251, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation

TS Olsen
Burke Rehabilitation Center, White Plains, New York.

I used leg and arm paresis to predict outcome measured as extremity function in a prospective study of 75 consecutive hemiplegic patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. In each patient, extremity paresis was quantified according to the five-point scoring system advised by the Medical Research Council, upper extremity function was quantified using the Barthel Index subscore for feeding and dressing the upper body, and lower extremity function was quantified according to a five-point scoring of the ability to walk. Improvement was recorded for upper extremity function in 52% of the patients and for lower extremity function in 89%. Best extremity function was reached a mean +/- SEM of 9 +/- 3 and 10 +/- 4 weeks after stroke for the upper and lower extremities, respectively. In patients experiencing complete recovery, this occurred a mean +/- SEM of 7 +/- 2 weeks (for both upper and lower extremities) after the stroke. Only 8- 11% of the patients with paresis scores of less than or equal to 2 regained independent extremity function after rehabilitation. Half of the patients with paresis scores of greater than or equal to 3 regained independent extremity function after rehabilitation, while the other half were able to perform extremity function with only minimal assistance. As predictors of extremity function, the Barthel Index subscore was slightly better (r = 0.64) than paresis score (r = 0.58). However, because evaluation of extremity paresis is easy, it appears to be useful as a preliminary predictor of outcome following stroke.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
B. C. Huijgen, M. M. Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. Zampolini, E. Opisso, M. Bernabeu, J. Van Nieuwenhoven, S. Ilsbroukx, R. Magni, C. Giacomozzi, V. Marcellari, et al.
Feasibility of a home-based telerehabilitation system compared to usual care: arm/hand function in patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis
J Telemed Telecare, July 1, 2008; 14(5): 249 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. N. McDonnell, S. L. Hillier, T. S. Miles, P. D. Thompson, and M. C. Ridding
Influence of Combined Afferent Stimulation and Task-Specific Training Following Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 435 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
P. L Scheets, S. A Sahrmann, and B. J Norton
Use of Movement System Diagnoses in the Management of Patients With Neuromuscular Conditions: A Multiple-Patient Case Report
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 654 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Van de Winckel, H. Feys, N. Lincoln, and W. De Weerdt
Assessment of arm function in stroke patients: Rivermead Motor Assessment arm section revised with Rasch analysis
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2007; 21(5): 471 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E. R Skidmore, J. C Rogers, L. S Chandler, and M. B Holm
Dynamic interactions between impairment and activity after stroke: examining the utility of decision analysis methods
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2006; 20(6): 523 - 535.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
A. S. Merians, H. Poizner, R. Boian, G. Burdea, and S. Adamovich
Sensorimotor Training in a Virtual Reality Environment: Does It Improve Functional Recovery Poststroke?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2006; 20(2): 252 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
B. Kollen, G. Kwakkel, and E. Lindeman
Time Dependency of Walking Classification in Stroke
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2006; 86(5): 618 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
B. Kollen, G. Kwakkel, and E. Lindeman
Longitudinal robustness of variables predicting independent gait following severe middle cerebral artery stroke: a prospective cohort study
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2006; 20(3): 262 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. Dancause, S. Barbay, S. B. Frost, E. J. Plautz, D. Chen, E. V. Zoubina, A. M. Stowe, and R. J. Nudo
Extensive Cortical Rewiring after Brain Injury
J. Neurosci., November 2, 2005; 25(44): 10167 - 10179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. Meldrum, S. J Pittock, O. Hardiman, C. N. Dhuill, M. O'Regan, and J. T Moroney
Recovery of the upper limb post ischaemic stroke and the predictive value of the Orpington Prognostic Score
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 694 - 702.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. G Canning, L. Ada, R. Adams, and N. J O'Dwyer
Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2004; 18(3): 300 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. S Merians, D. Jack, R. Boian, M. Tremaine, G. C Burdea, S. V Adamovich, M. Recce, and H. Poizner
Virtual Reality-Augmented Rehabilitation for Patients Following Stroke
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2002; 82(9): 898 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S.-M. Lai, S. Studenski, P. W. Duncan, and S. Perera
Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale
Stroke, July 1, 2002; 33(7): 1840 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
F. d. N. A. P. Shelton, B. T. Volpe, and M. Reding
Motor Impairment as a Predictor of Functional Recovery and Guide to Rehabilitation Treatment After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2001; 15(3): 229 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
A. W. Andrews and R. W. Bohannon
Discharge Function and Length of Stay for Patients with Stroke are Predicted by Lower Extremity Muscle Force on Admission to Rehabilitation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2001; 15(2): 93 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelstein, C. Diels, and M. Aisen
A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation
Neurology, May 23, 2000; 54(10): 1938 - 1944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
H. Feys, J. Van Hees, F. Bruyninckx, R. Mercelis, and W. De Weerdt
Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2000; 68(3): 323 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. S. Kidwell, S. Starkman, M. Eckstein, K. Weems, and J. L. Saver
Identifying Stroke in the Field : Prospective Validation of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS)
Stroke, January 1, 2000; 31(1): 71 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C Mercier, D Bourbonnais, S Bilodeau, J F Lemay, and P Cross
Description of a new motor re-education programme for the paretic lower limb aimed at improving the mobility of stroke patients
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 1999; 13(3): 199 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. V. Escudero, J. Sancho, D. Bautista, M. Escudero, and J. Lopez-Trigo
Prognostic Value of Motor Evoked Potential Obtained by Transcranial Magnetic Brain Stimulation in Motor Function Recovery in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1854 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. M. Feys, W. J. De Weerdt, B. E. Selz, G. A. Cox Steck, R. Spichiger, L. E. Vereeck, K. D. Putman, and G. A. Van Hoydonck
Effect of a Therapeutic Intervention for the Hemiplegic Upper Limb in the Acute Phase After Stroke : A Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
Stroke, April 1, 1998; 29(4): 785 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
M. G. Chua, S. M. Davis, B. Infeld, S. C. Rossiter, B. M. Tress, and J. L. Hopper
Prediction of Functional Outcome and Tissue Loss in Acute Cortical Infarction
Arch Neurol, May 1, 1995; 52(5): 496 - 500.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
D. C. Good
Treatment Strategies for Enhancing Motor Recovery in Stroke Rehabilitation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1994; 8(4): 177 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. W Bohannon and T. Puharic
Torque fluctuations during maximal voluntary knee extension efforts after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1992; 6(4): 305 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]