Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood-Dauphinee, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood-Dauphinee, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, S. H.

Stroke, Vol 21, 731-739, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke

SL Wood-Dauphinee, JI Williams and SH Shapiro
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

We investigated the relation between outcome and sample size for six selected stroke outcome measures to assist investigators in selecting end points for stroke studies. Data from a clinical trial of 167 stroke patients assessed shortly after admission to the hospital and 5 weeks later provided information on clinical, motor, and functional outcomes measured using a neurologic status scale, a stroke severity scale, the Fugl-Meyer Scale, the Barthel Index, and the activities of daily living and cognition subscales of the Level of Rehabilitation Scale. Data were examined using Pearson correlation coefficients and power analyses. All measures were significantly correlated. There was also substantial congruency between the subscales of a measure and its total score. The measures had variable efficiencies; the Barthel Index was the most efficient and therefore required the fewest subjects to identify a significant effect. These data suggest that careful consideration must be given to the choice of stroke outcome measures in terms of their numbers, interrelationships, and statistical properties, as these factors have important implications for the design, analysis, and conduct of clinical stroke studies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
L. De Wit, M. Molas, E. Dejaeger, W. De Weerdt, H. Feys, W. Jenni, N. Lincoln, K. Putman, W. Schupp, and E. Lesaffre
The Use of a Biplot in Studying Outcomes After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2009; 23(8): 825 - 830.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J.-H. Lin, M.-J. Hsu, C.-F. Sheu, T.-S. Wu, R.-T. Lin, C.-H. Chen, and C.-L. Hsieh
Psychometric Comparisons of 4 Measures for Assessing Upper-Extremity Function in People With Stroke
Physical Therapy, August 1, 2009; 89(8): 840 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. R. Lindquist, C. L Prado, R. M. Barros, R. Mattioli, P. H L. da Costa, and T. F Salvini
Gait Training Combining Partial Body-Weight Support, a Treadmill, and Functional Electrical Stimulation: Effects on Poststroke Gait
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1144 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Raghavan, E. Petra, J. W. Krakauer, and A. M. Gordon
Patterns of Impairment in Digit Independence After Subcortical Stroke
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 369 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. Ahmed, N. E Mayo, J. Higgins, N. M Salbach, L. Finch, and S. L Wood-Dauphinee
The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): A Comparison With Other Measures Used to Evaluate Effects of Stroke and Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2003; 83(7): 617 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J A Simondson, P Goldie, and K M Greenwood
The Mobility Scale for Acute Stroke Patients: concurrent validity
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2003; 17(5): 558 - 564.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
D. J. Gladstone, C. J. Danells, and S. E. Black
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2002; 16(3): 232 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
O. O. Zaidat, J. I. Suarez, C. Santillan, J. L. Sunshine, R. W. Tarr, V. H. Paras, W. R. Selman, D. M.D. Landis, and D. D. Tong
Response to Intra-Arterial and Combined Intravenous and Intra-Arterial Thrombolytic Therapy in Patients With Distal Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion * Editorial Comment
Stroke, July 1, 2002; 33(7): 1821 - 1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. K.-H. Sze, E. Wong, X. Yi, and J. Woo
Does Acupuncture Have Additional Value to Standard Poststroke Motor Rehabilitation?
Stroke, January 1, 2002; 33(1): 186 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. L. Wolf, P. A. Catlin, M. Ellis, A. L. Archer, B. Morgan, and A. Piacentino
Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke
Stroke, July 1, 2001; 32(7): 1635 - 1639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Patel, C. Coshall, A. G. Rudd, and C. D.A. Wolfe
Natural History and Effects on 2-Year Outcomes of Urinary Incontinence After Stroke
Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 122 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Benaim, D. A. Perennou, J. Villy, M. Rousseaux, and J. Y. Pelissier
Validation of a Standardized Assessment of Postural Control in Stroke Patients : The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)
Stroke, September 1, 1999; 30 (9): e1862 - 1868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Kelly-Hayes, J. T. Robertson, J. P. Broderick, P. W. Duncan, L. A. Hershey, E. J. Roth, W. H. Thies, and C. A. Trombly
The American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification: Executive Summary
Circulation, June 23, 1998; 97(24): 2474 - 2478.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Kelly-Hayes, J. T. Robertson, J. P. Broderick, P. W. Duncan, L. A. Hershey, E. J. Roth, W. H. Thies, and C. A. Trombly
The American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification
Stroke, June 1, 1998; 29(6): 1274 - 1280.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
G. Alon, A. Dar, D. Katz-Behiri, H. Weingarden, and R. Nathan
Efficacy of a Hybrid Upper Limb Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System in Lessening Selected Impairments and Dysfunctions Consequent to Cerebral Damage
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1998; 12(2): 73 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. C. Cramer, G. Nelles, J. D. Schaechter, J. D. Kaplan, and S. P. Finklestein
Computerized Measurement of Motor Performance After Stroke
Stroke, November 1, 1997; 28(11): 2162 - 2168.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J.P. Mohr
Some Clinical Aspects of Acute Stroke : Excellence in Clinical Stroke Award Lecture
Stroke, September 1, 1997; 28(9): 1835 - 1839.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Aging HealthHome page
K. Berg and V. Mor
Medicare Nursing Home Residents with a Stroke: Characteristics and 90-Day Outcomes of Care
J Aging Health, August 1, 1995; 7(3): 384 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Tuomilehto, T. Nuottimaki, K. Salmi, K. Aho, M. Kotila, C. Sarti, and D. Rastenyte
Psychosocial and Health Status in Stroke Survivors After 14 Years
Stroke, June 1, 1995; 26(6): 971 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
D. C. Good
Treatment Strategies for Enhancing Motor Recovery in Stroke Rehabilitation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1994; 8(4): 177 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]