Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1990;21:1280-1282

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weingarten, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ellrodt, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weingarten, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ellrodt, A. G.

Stroke, Vol 21, 1280-1282, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

The principle of parsimony: Glasgow Coma Scale score predicts mortality as well as the APACHE II score for stroke patients

S Weingarten, R Bolus, MS Riedinger, L Maldonado, S Stein and AG Ellrodt
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048.

Although the development and use of severity-of-illness measures has gained widespread enthusiasm, uncertainty remains as to the optimal measure for stroke patients. The Health Care Financing Administration recently derived a severity-of-illness measure based on the APACHE II system to explain differences in Medicare mortality rates among hospitals treating stroke patients. We hypothesized that the Glasgow Coma Scale score provides prognostic information of accuracy comparable to that of the APACHE II score for stroke patients, yet is simpler and cheaper to abstract from the medical record. We therefore studied 246 patients hospitalized with stroke, including 49 oversampled mortalities. The Glasgow Coma Scale score was as accurate as the APACHE II score in predicting stroke mortality both before (r = -0.50 and r = 0.50, respectively) and after (r = -0.40 and r = 0.38, respectively) the oversampled mortalities were excluded. The APACHE II score required abstraction of 16 variables from the medical record compared with three for the Glasgow Coma Scale score and required more than three times the time to abstract from the medical record. Therefore, in the interest of parsimonious data collection, the Glasgow Coma Scale may be a preferable severity-of-illness measure for patients with stroke.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Counsell, M. Dennis, M. McDowall, and C. Warlow
Predicting Outcome After Acute and Subacute Stroke: Development and Validation of New Prognostic Models
Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 1041 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]