This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hasan, D. Articles by Vermeulen, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hasan, D. Articles by Vermeulen, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Hydrocephalus

Stroke, Vol 22, 190-194, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Treatment of acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage with serial lumbar puncture

D Hasan, KW Lindsay and M Vermeulen
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Computed tomography demonstrated acute hydrocephalus less than or equal to 72 hours after subarachnoid hemorrhage in 24 (23%) of 104 patients. Of these 24 patients, six (25%) had no impairment of consciousness. In nine (11%) of the remaining 80 patients, acute hydrocephalus developed within 1 week after subarachnoid hemorrhage. With the exception of three patients, all 104 patients received antifibrinolytic treatment. Delayed clinical deterioration from acute hydrocephalus occurred in seven (29%) of the 24 patients with acute hydrocephalus on admission and in six (8%) of the remaining 80 patients. Serial lumbar puncture was performed in 17 patients. Twelve (71%) of the 17 patients treated with serial lumbar puncture, including 10 (77%) of the 13 patients with delayed deterioration from acute hydrocephalus after admission, achieved improvement in the level of consciousness. Four of these 17 patients (4% of all 104 patients) required an internal shunt. No patient deteriorated from coning following serial lumbar puncture. The rebleeding rate within 12 days after subarachnoid hemorrhage in hydrocephalic patients with serial lumbar puncture was not higher than the rate in those without hydrocephalus (two [12%] of 17 versus nine [13%] of 71). Neither meningitis nor ventriculitis was observed. We conclude that if neither a hematoma with a mass effect nor an obstructive element exists, cerebrospinal fluid drainage with serial lumbar puncture is a good alternative to ventricular drainage in patients with acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Hellingman, W. M. van den Bergh, I. S. Beijer, G. W. van Dijk, A. Algra, J. van Gijn, and G. J.E. Rinkel Risk of Rebleeding After Treatment of Acute Hydrocephalus in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Stroke, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 96 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M Coplin, A. M Avellino, D K Kim, H R. Winn, and M S. Grady Bacterial meningitis associated with lumbar drains: a retrospective cohort study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 1999; 67(4): 468 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]