Stroke, Vol 23, 479-482, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association
JA Freischlag, D Hanna and WS Moore
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The value of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic
patients with high-grade stenosis is controversial. The objective of this
study is to compare the immediate and long-term outcome of patients after
carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis (greater than 75%)
with the reported natural history of patients followed nonoperatively to
determine whether carotid endarterectomy reduces the subsequent
neurological event rate. METHODS: The data from 141 carotid
endarterectomies performed in 123 patients between January 1980 and
December 1986 were reviewed from the perspective of perioperative results
and long-term follow-up to January 1990, providing a follow-up ranging from
3 to 10 years. The mean follow- up was 56.6 months (range 27-117 months).
RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths. There were two postoperative
stokes: one in the cerebellar distribution and one in the middle cerebral
distribution. During the course of follow-up, no patient suffered a stroke
in the hemisphere ipsilateral to carotid endarterectomy. One patient
developed ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks 24 months after surgery
associated with carotid restenosis. A total of three patients developed
four recurrent carotid stenoses, for an incidence of 2.8%. All four
recurrences were corrected surgically. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are in
marked contrast to the reported natural history of patients with greater
than 75% stenosis in which the 1-year neurological event rate is 18% and
the 1-year stroke rate is 5%. Although final proof of efficacy for
prophylactic carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients will await the
outcome of randomized trials, until these data are available, prophylactic
carotid endarterectomy is justified in centers of excellence that can
perform the surgery with low perioperative risk.
ARTICLES
Improved prognosis for asymptomatic carotid stenosis with prophylactic carotid endarterectomy
Division of Vascular Surgery, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Olcott IV, R. S. Mitchell, G. K. Steinberg, and C. K. Zarins Institutional Peer Review Can Reduce the Risk and Cost of Carotid Endarterectomy Arch Surg, August 1, 2000; 135(8): 939 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Marcinczyk, G. G. Nicholas, J. F. Reed III, and S. A. Nastasee Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy: Patient and Surgeon Selection Stroke, February 1, 1997; 28(2): 291 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. O. Daily, R. K. Freeman, W. P. Dembitsky, R. M. Adamson, R. J. Moreno-Cabral, S. Marcus, and J. A. Lamphere COST REDUCTION BY COMBINED CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY AND CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1996; 111(6): 1185 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Moore, H.J.M. Barnett, H. G. Beebe, E. F. Bernstein, B. J. Brener, T. Brott, L. R. Caplan, A. Day, J. Goldstone, R. W. Hobson II, et al. Guidelines for Carotid Endarterectomy : A Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement From the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 566 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Moore, H.J.M. Barnett, H. G. Beebe, E. F. Bernstein, B. J. Brener, T. Brott, L. R. Caplan, A. Day, J. Goldstone, R. W. Hobson II, et al. Guidelines for Carotid Endarterectomy : A Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement From the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association Stroke, January 1, 1995; 26(1): 188 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Colburn and W. S. Moore Risk-Benefit Aspects of Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1994; 7(2): 6 - 30. [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1992 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |