This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Markus, H. Articles by Brown, M. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Markus, H. Articles by Brown, M. M.

Stroke, Vol 24, 1667-1672, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Computerized detection of cerebral emboli and discrimination from artifact using Doppler ultrasound

H Markus, A Loh and MM Brown
Division of Clinical Neuroscience, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transcranial Doppler ultrasound can detect circulating cerebral emboli. Monitoring of patients with potential embolic sources may allow identification of high-risk patients who can then be selected for prophylactic treatment. However, practical patient monitoring will require automated programs that can detect emboli and differentiate them from artifact. METHODS: A new off-line algorithm for the detection of emboli, which detects the characteristic relative power increase occurring with an embolus, was evaluated in both an animal model and in patients. (1) In a sheep model, solid embolic materials (thrombus, platelet aggregates, and atheroma) were introduced into the proximal carotid artery while the distal carotid artery or a major branch was insonated. The signals resulting from 77 emboli (mean size, 1.77 mm) were studied and compared with the Doppler signals resulting from artifact. (2) In patients, 100 embolic signals occurring in three patients were analyzed and compared with signals associated with artifact in the same patients. RESULTS: (1) In the sheep model, emboli resulted in a short-duration, high-intensity signal, but intensity increase alone did not distinguish between emboli and artifact. In contrast, the algorithm discriminated embolus from artifact with a sensitivity of 98.7% and a specificity of 98.0%. (2) In patient studies, embolic signals were differentiated from artifact with a sensitivity of 97.2% and a specificity of 97.0% by the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Using such an algorithm, detection of cerebral emboli and discrimination from artifact are possible with a high sensitivity and specificity. Incorporation of such an algorithm into an on-line system should make prolonged patient monitoring practical.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Manca, G. Parenti, R. Bellina, G. Boni, M. Grosso, W. Bernini, C. Palombo, M. Paterni, G. Pelosi, M. Lanza, et al. 111In Platelet Scintigraphy for the Noninvasive Detection of Carotid Plaque Thrombosis Stroke, March 1, 2001; 32(3): 719 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Rolle, J. Pengloan, M. Abazza, J. M. Halimi, M. Laskar, L. Pourcelot, and F. Tranquart Identification of microemboli during haemodialysis using Doppler ultrasound Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1420 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Markus, M. Cullinane, and G. Reid Improved Automated Detection of Embolic Signals Using a Novel Frequency Filtering Approach Stroke, August 1, 1999; 30(8): 1610 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Furui, K. Hanzawa, H. Ohzeki, T. Nakajima, N. Fukuhara, M. Takamori, J.P. Mohr, and C. Stapf "Tail Sign" Associated With Microembolic Signals • Editorial Comment Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 863 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. M. Keunen, C. J. Stam, D. L. J. Tavy, W. H. Mess, B. M. Titulaer, and R. G. A. Ackerstaff Preliminary Report of Detecting Microembolic Signals in Transcranial Doppler Time Series With Nonlinear Forecasting Stroke, August 1, 1998; 29(8): 1638 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ries, K. Tiemann, C. Pohl, C. Bauer, M. Mundo, and H. Becher High-Resolution Emboli Detection and Differentiation by Characteristic Postembolic Spectral Patterns Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 668 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. S. Markus and J. Molloy Use of a Decibel Threshold in Detecting Doppler Embolic Signals Stroke, April 1, 1997; 28(4): 692 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. W. Droste, G. Hagedorn, A. Notzold, H.-J. Siemens, H. H. Sievers, and M. Kaps Bigated Transcranial Doppler for the Detection of Clinically Silent Circulating Emboli in Normal Persons and Patients With Prosthetic Cardiac Valves Stroke, March 1, 1997; 28(3): 588 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				U. Sliwka, A. Lingnau, W.-D. Stohlmann, P. Schmidt, M. Mull, R. R. Diehl, and J. Noth Prevalence and Time Course of Microembolic Signals in Patients With Acute Stroke: A Prospective Study Stroke, February 1, 1997; 28(2): 358 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. V. Van Zuilen, W. H. Mess, C. Jansen, I. Van Der Tweel, J. Van Gijn, and R. G.A. Ackerstaff Automatic Embolus Detection Compared With Human Experts: A Doppler Ultrasound Study Stroke, October 1, 1996; 27(10): 1840 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Molloy and H. S. Markus Multigated Doppler Ultrasound in the Detection of Emboli in a Flow Model and Embolic Signals in Patients Stroke, September 1, 1996; 27(9): 1548 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D.G. Nabavi, D. Georgiadis, T. Mumme, C. Schmid, T.G. Mackay, H.H. Scheld, and E.B. Ringelstein Clinical Relevance of Intracranial Microembolic Signals in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices : A Prospective Study Stroke, May 1, 1996; 27(5): 891 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. Georgiadis, J. Goeke, M. Hill, M. Konig, D.G. Nabavi, F. Stogbauer, P. Zunker, and E.B. Ringelstein A Novel Technique for Identification of Doppler Microembolic Signals Based on the Coincidence Method : In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation Stroke, April 1, 1996; 27(4): 683 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				U. Sliwka, F.-P. Job, D. Wissuwa, R. R. Diehl, F.-A. Flachskampf, P. Hanrath, and J. Noth Occurrence of Transcranial Doppler High-Intensity Transient Signals in Patients With Potential Cardiac Sources of Embolism : A Prospective Study Stroke, November 1, 1995; 26(11): 2067 - 2070. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. S. Markus and M. J. Harrison Microembolic Signal Detection Using Ultrasound Stroke, September 1, 1995; 26(9): 1517 - 1519. [Full Text]

				E. V. van Zuilen, F. L. Moll, F. E.E. Vermeulen, H. W. Mauser, J. van Gijn, and R. G.A. Ackerstaff Detection of Cerebral Microemboli by Means of Transcranial Doppler Monitoring Before and After Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, February 1, 1995; 26(2): 210 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text]