This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lagreze, H. L. Articles by Hartmann, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lagreze, H. L. Articles by Hartmann, A.

Stroke, Vol 24, 387-391, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Data analysis in behavioral cerebral blood flow activation studies using xenon-133 clearance

HL Lagreze and A Hartmann
Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Bonn, FRG.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Three mainstream strategies exist to detect the responses of regional cerebral blood flow to functional activation. We tested the significance of changes in raw regional cerebral blood flow data, regional cerebral blood flow data normalized by division by global cerebral blood flow (dependent model of the regional-to-global cerebral blood flow relation), and regional cerebral blood flow data treating global cerebral blood flow as a covariate (independent model). Both latter models attempt to enhance regional sensitivity by removing global effects. We examined the sensitivity and pitfalls of these three strategies in behavioral activation studies. METHODS: These three strategies of data analysis were applied to changes in regional cerebral blood flow induced by a visuospatial problem-solving task in 38 healthy subjects as measured by the intravenous xenon-133 method with 32 stationary detectors. RESULTS: Mental activation increased blood flow in all regions of interest. Raw data were most sensitive and reliable to detect responses to mental stimulation. Both the independent and dependent models to remove global effects were less sensitive and falsely indicated deactivation in regions that were clearly stimulated. CONCLUSIONS: In behavioral activation paradigms, safe data analysis should be restricted to using raw regional cerebral blood flow increases without normalization or separation of global from regional effects. Studies using complex stimulation tasks should be scrutinized for global cerebral blood flow effects confounding regional responses.