This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sarti, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sarti, C.

Stroke, Vol 24, 787-791, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Geographic variation in the incidence of nonfatal stroke in Finland. Are the observed differences real? FINMONICA Stroke Register Study Group

C Sarti
National Public Health Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Helsinki, Finland.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to find an explanation for the geographical variation in the incidence of nonfatal stroke detected in the FINMONICA stroke register during the period 1983-1985. METHODS: Two separate investigations were made. In the first, a sample of approximately 100 nonfatal events drawn from each of the three monitoring areas (North Karelia, Kuopio, and Turku/Loimaa) participating in FINMONICA was recoded by an independent coder. In the second, 29 nonfatal events from Kuopio and 29 from North Karelia were recorded by the neurologist of the other area. Kappa coefficients (kappa) were calculated to measure the proportion of agreement beyond chance among the different coders. RESULTS: A good level of agreement with the independent coder was found for each of the three areas; it was best for the cases from Turku/Loimaa (kappa = 0.896), followed by Kuopio (kappa = 0.792) and North Karelia (kappa = 0.616). In the second part of the investigation, agreement was higher for the stroke cases originating from Kuopio (kappa = 0.861) than for those from North Karelia (kappa = 0.563). In the latter there was discrepancy in the classification of the cases originally classified as no stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the first part of the investigation suggest that the lower incidence of nonfatal stroke in Turku/Loimaa was real, confirming findings in previous studies. Differences in data entry, rather than in the interpretation of signs and symptoms of stroke, were the main cause of disagreement in the second part of the investigation, where the disagreement primarily concerned the cases classified as no stroke in North Karelia. The results also indicate that the different proportions of patients submitted to computerized brain tomography conceivably account for a good part of the difference in the incidence rates of nonfatal stroke between Kuopio and North Karelia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Immonen-Raiha, M. Mahonen, J. Tuomilehto, V. Salomaa, E. Kaarsalo, E. V. Narva, K. Salmi, C. Sarti, J. Sivenius, K. Alhainen, et al. Trends in Case-Fatality of Stroke in Finland During 1983 to 1992 Stroke, December 1, 1997; 28(12): 2493 - 2499. [Abstract] [Full Text]