Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1993;24:1330-1334

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doris, I.
Right arrow Articles by Jaeschke, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doris, I.
Right arrow Articles by Jaeschke, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Carotid Artery Disease

Stroke, Vol 24, 1330-1334, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

The relevance of detecting carotid artery calcification on plain radiograph

I Doris, J Dobranowski, AA Franchetto and R Jaeschke
Department of Radiology, Hamilton General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the potential value of carotid artery calcification observed on plain radiographs in patients referred for carotid angiogram in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: One hundred sixty consecutive patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis underwent both plain radiographs of the carotid arteries and digital subtraction angiography of the same vessels. In addition, 108 of these patients also had duplex ultrasound of the same vascular area. The clinical usefulness of the carotid artery calcification was assessed by calculating the likelihood ratios for different test results against results of angiography and duplex ultrasound. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant association between the degrees of calcification and carotid disease as demonstrated by angiography (P = .0001), although positive correlations of the degrees of stenosis and calcification was only fair (Spearman correlation coefficient r = .4). The sensitivity of carotid calcification in detecting clinically significant stenosis assuming any calcification is abnormal was 89% with a specificity of 46%. The likelihood ratios for 50% stenosis by angiography varied from 0.24 (no calcification) to 3.41 (level III) and for 50% stenosis by duplex ultrasound varied from 0.21 (no calcification) to more than 5.87 (level III). Assessments of the degree of calcification based on plain radiographs had excellent reproducibility (all intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than .9). CONCLUSIONS: In this population with a high prevalence of carotid artery disease, there is an association between the presence of carotid calcification and atheromatous disease. If subsequent studies were to show this to apply in the general population, this could be of value in identifying asymptomatic patients at increased risk.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. J. SWENSEN, J. R. JETT, J. A. SLOAN, D. E. MIDTHUN, T. E. HARTMAN, A.-M. SYKES, G. L. AUGHENBAUGH, F. E. ZINK, S. L. HILLMAN, G. R. NOETZEL, et al.
Screening for Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral Computed Tomography
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2002; 165(4): 508 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]