Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1993;24:1389-1392

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korpelainen, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Myllyla, V. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korpelainen, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Myllyla, V. V.

Stroke, Vol 24, 1389-1392, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Suppressed sympathetic skin response in brain infarction

JT Korpelainen, U Tolonen, KA Sotaniemi and VV Myllyla
Department of Neurology, University of Oulu, Finland.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Autonomic failure is known to manifest commonly in stroke, but very little attention has been given to various features of sympathetic dysfunction such as sudomotor dysregulation in cerebrovascular diseases. In the present study, our purpose was to assess quantitatively sympathetic reflex activity in brain infarction by measuring the sympathetic skin response. METHODS: We recorded the sympathetic skin response to electric and auditory stimulations simultaneously on both hands in 58 patients with brain infarction and in 36 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: The response amplitudes were significantly decreased and the latencies prolonged in both hemispheral (n = 49) and brain stem (n = 9) infarctions compared with the control subjects. The amplitudes were diminished in both the acute and late phases of infarction, but the latencies were prolonged only in the acute phase. CONCLUSIONS: Sympathetic dysfunction in brain infarction seems to be much more extensive than has previously been thought. In the present study, we have demonstrated impaired sympathetic skin responses, reflecting definite suppression of the reflex activity of the sympathetic nervous system.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
H. Kumru, J. Vidal, M. Perez, P. Schestatsky, and J. Valls-Sole
Sympathetic Skin Responses Evoked by Different Stimuli Modalities in Spinal Cord Injury Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 553 - 558.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
V Kumar, J Kalita, R B Gujral, V P Sharma, and U K Misra
A study of bone densitometry in patients with complex regional pain syndrome after stroke
Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2001; 77(910): 519 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. J. Gurrera
Sympathoadrenal Hyperactivity and the Etiology of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 1999; 156(2): 169 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. T. Korpelainen, K. A. Sotaniemi, H. V. Huikuri, and V. V. Myllyla
Abnormal Heart Rate Variability as a Manifestation of Autonomic Dysfunction in Hemispheric Brain Infarction
Stroke, November 1, 1996; 27(11): 2059 - 2063.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Rousseaux, J. F. Hurtevent, C. Benaim, and F. Cassim
Late Contralateral Hyperhidrosis in Lateral Medullary Infarcts
Stroke, May 1, 1996; 27(5): 991 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. Naver, C. Blomstrand, S. Ekholm, C. Jensen, T. Karlsson, and B. G. Wallin
Autonomic and Thermal Sensory Symptoms and Dysfunction After Stroke
Stroke, August 1, 1995; 26(8): 1379 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. Hesse, M.T. Jahnke, R. Ehret, and K.H. Mauritz
Shoulder-Hand Syndrome in Hemiplegic Patients: Temperature, Sympathetic Skin Responses, and Nerve Latencies of the Affected and Nonaffected Upper Extremity
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1995; 9(4): 229 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]