This Article Order Full text via Infotrieve Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lodder, J. Articles by Boiten, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lodder, J. Articles by Boiten, J.

Stroke, Vol 25, 86-91, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

What causes false clinical prediction of small deep infarcts?

J Lodder, J Bamford, J Kappelle and J Boiten
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE--Our goal was to identify factors that play a role in false clinical diagnosis of small deep infarcts. METHODS--In 350 prospectively registered patients with a first supratentorial ischemic stroke, we clinically differentiated between lacunar and nonlacunar syndromes. Using computed tomography (CT), we distinguished small deep and territorial infarcts and also recorded leukoaraiosis and asymptomatic infarcts. Degree of initial handicap, potential source of cardioembolic stroke, and hypertension were also noted. RESULTS--One hundred forty-seven patients had a lacunar and 203 a nonlacunar syndrome. Forty-two (12%) had a lesion visualized by CT that was compatible with a recent infarct but was considered inappropriate for the clinical syndrome: nineteen had a nonlacunar syndrome but a small deep infarct, and 23 had a lacunar syndrome but a territorial infarct. Patients with a nonlacunar syndrome but a small deep infarct were more severely disabled (a modified Rankin scale rating of 5) (odds ratio [OR], 4.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25 to 14.88) and had a cardioembolic source (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.04 to 15.95), leukoaraiosis (OR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.32 to 10.05), or asymptomatic infarcts visualized by CT (OR, 4.13; 95% CI, 1.45 to 11.71) compared with 124 patients with a correctly diagnosed small deep infarct. Twelve of 19 patients with a nonlacunar syndrome but a small deep infarct had a lesion in the left hemisphere, and 9 of these 12 had "aphasia." Patients with a lacunar syndrome but a territorial infarct more often had a cardioembolic source (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.15 to 14.03) and a pure motor syndrome (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 1.55 to 13.18) than those with lacunar syndrome but a small deep infarct, although 21 (91%) were in the right hemisphere. Of the first 103 patients with lacunar stroke diagnosed by two of the study neurologists, 5 had an inappropriate lesion compared with 14 of the later 40 diagnosed by colleagues without a specific interest in cerebrovascular diseases (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.26). CONCLUSIONS-- (1) Diagnosis of lacunar syndromes should not be influenced by deficit severity or the presence of a potential cardiac source of embolism. (2) Speech disorders should carefully be classified. (3) Routine tests of nondominant higher functions may be inadequate. (4) Doctors interested in cerebrovascular neurology have a lower failure rate in differentiating small deep infarcts from territorial infarcts than those less well-trained or interested in neurology. (5) Among the lacunar syndromes, pure motor syndrome may be the least specific predictor of a small deep infarct.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S J Allder, A R Moody, A L Martel, P S Morgan, G S Delay, J R Gladman, and G G Lennox Differences in the diagnostic accuracy of acute stroke clinical subtypes defined by multimodal magnetic resonance imaging J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2003; 74(7): 886 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Tejada, E. Diez-Tejedor, L. Hernandez-Echebarria, and O. Balboa Does a Relationship Exist Between Carotid Stenosis and Lacunar Infarction? Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1404 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Toni, F. Iweins, R. von Kummer, O. Busse, J. Bogousslavsky, A. Falcou, E. Lesaffre, and G. L. Lenzi Identification of lacunar infarcts before thrombolysis in the ECASS I study Neurology, February 8, 2000; 54(3): 684 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Gorman, R. Dafer, and S. R. Levine Ataxic Hemiparesis : Critical Appraisal of a Lacunar Syndrome Stroke, December 1, 1998; 29(12): 2549 - 2555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Lyrer, S. Engelter, E. W. Radu, and A. J. Steck Cerebral Infarcts Related to Isolated Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Stroke, May 1, 1997; 28(5): 1022 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				L. D'Olhaberriague, I. Litvan, P. Mitsias, and H. H. Mansbach A Reappraisal of Reliability and Validity Studies in Stroke Stroke, December 1, 1996; 27(12): 2331 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. Toni, M. Fiorelli, M. De Michele, S. Bastianello, M. L. Sacchetti, E. Montinaro, E. M. Zanette, and C. Argentino Clinical and Prognostic Correlates of Stroke Subtype Misdiagnosis Within 12 Hours From Onset Stroke, October 1, 1995; 26(10): 1837 - 1840. [Abstract] [Full Text]