Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1994;25:1920-1923

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gomez, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Banet, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gomez, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Banet, G. A.

Stroke, Vol 25, 1920-1923, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Code stroke. An attempt to shorten inhospital therapeutic delays

CR Gomez, MD Malkoff, CM Sauer, R Tulyapronchote, CM Burch and GA Banet
Souers Stroke Institute, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, MO 63110.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Significant delays often occur during the treatment of patients with acute stroke. Some of those delays occur in the hospital. We attempted to shorten inhospital treatment intervals by creating a rapid-response system, similar to that available for cardiac arrest, that would allow the stroke team to be available within a few minutes to care for stroke victims. METHODS: We connected all beepers (pocket pagers) of stroke team members to a common access number and instructed the emergency staff to activate that number immediately upon arrival of a stroke victim. We monitored the response time and treatment interval for patients who were treated after this system was activated (Code Stroke patients) during the first 3 months of its availability and compared the results to those of patients seen for similar reasons during the study period but without the use of Code Stroke (control patients). RESULTS: A total of 12 Code Stroke patients were available for analysis, representing 12% of all patients (n = 98) seen in the emergency department for ischemic stroke during the study period. The remaining 86 patients constituted the control group. The mean time to evaluation of a Code Stroke patient by a stroke team member was 4.8 minutes (range, 2 to 7 minutes), and the mean time to treatment institution was 30 minutes (range, 10 to 120 minutes). There were significant differences between the consultation intervals in the two groups (P < .05). There was only a trend of a difference between treatment institution intervals (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to shorten inhospital treatment delays by instituting rapid-response systems within individual institutions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
E. C. Leira, D. C. Hess, J. C. Torner, and H. P. Adams Jr
Rural-Urban Differences in Acute Stroke Management Practices: A Modifiable Disparity
Arch Neurol, July 1, 2008; 65(7): 887 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. E. Acker III, A. M. Pancioli, T. J. Crocco, M. K. Eckstein, E. C. Jauch, H. Larrabee, N. M. Meltzer, W. C. Mergendahl, J. W. Munn, S. M. Prentiss, et al.
Implementation Strategies for Emergency Medical Services Within Stroke Systems of Care: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association Expert Panel on Emergency Medical Services Systems and the Stroke Council
Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 3097 - 3115.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
V. C. Douglas, D. C. Tong, L. A. Gillum, S. Zhao, L. M. Brass, J. Dostal, and S. C. Johnston
Do the Brain Attack Coalition's criteria for stroke centers improve care for ischemic stroke?
Neurology, February 8, 2005; 64(3): 422 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
J. Kwan, P. Hand, and P. Sandercock
Improving the efficiency of delivery of thrombolysis for acute stroke: a systematic review
QJM, May 1, 2004; 97(5): 273 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
W.S. Burgin, L. Staub, W. Chan, PhD;, T.H. Wein, R.A. Felberg, J.C. Grotta, A.M. Demchuk, S.L. Hickenbottom, and L.B. Morgenstern
Acute stroke care in non-urban emergency departments
Neurology, December 11, 2001; 57(11): 2006 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. A. Gillum and S. C. Johnston
Characteristics of Academic Medical Centers and Ischemic Stroke Outcomes
Stroke, September 1, 2001; 32(9): 2137 - 2142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. J. Alberts, G. Hademenos, R. E. Latchaw, A. Jagoda, J. R. Marler, M. R. Mayberg, R. D. Starke, H. W. Todd, K. M. Viste, M. Girgus, et al.
Recommendations for the Establishment of Primary Stroke Centers
JAMA, June 21, 2000; 283(23): 3102 - 3109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. J. Alberts, S. Chaturvedi, G. Graham, R. L. Hughes, D. G. Jamieson, F. Krakowski, E. Raps, and P. Scott
Acute Stroke Teams : Results of a National Survey
Stroke, November 1, 1998; 29(11): 2318 - 2320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
B. C. Tilley, P. D. Lyden, T. G. Brott, M. Lu, S. R. Levine, K. M. A. Welch, and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and S
Total Quality Improvement Method for Reduction of Delays Between Emergency Department Admission and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
Arch Neurol, December 1, 1997; 54(12): 1466 - 1474.
[Abstract] [PDF]