Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1994;25:2435-2439

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothwell, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Warlow, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rothwell, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Warlow, C. P.

Stroke, Vol 25, 2435-2439, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group

PM Rothwell, RJ Gibson, J Slattery, RJ Sellar and CP Warlow
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is confusion about how carotid stenosis should be measured on angiograms. If the results of research based on different methods of measurement of stenosis are to be discussed and the results of clinical trials properly applied to routine clinical practice, measurements made by the different methods must be formally compared. METHODS: The method of measurement of stenosis used in the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), that used in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), and a method based on measurement of the common carotid (CC) artery lumen diameter were compared. Carotid stenosis was measured by two observers, working independently and using the three different methods of measurement, on the angiographic view of the symptomatic carotid stenosis that showed the most severe disease in 1001 patients from the ECST. RESULTS: The results of using the ECST and CC methods differed from those of using the NASCET method in the classification of stenoses as mild (0% to 29%), moderate (30% to 69%), or severe (70% to 99%) in 51% of measurements. The ECST and CC methods indicated that twice as many stenoses were severe as did the NASCET method, and classified less than a third of the number of stenoses as mild. The results of the ECST and CC methods differed from each other in 15% of measurements. The relations between measurements made by each method to those made by the others were approximately linear, so a simple equation could be derived to convert measurements made by one method to measurements made by the others. CONCLUSIONS: There were major and clinically important disparities between measurements of stenosis made using different methods of measurement on the same angiograms. However, it is possible to convert measurements made by one method to those of another using a simple arithmetic equation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. C. Schumacher, P. M. Meyers, R. T. Higashida, C. P. Derdeyn, S. D. Lavine, G. M. Nesbit, D. Sacks, P. Rasmussen, and L. R. Wechsler
Reporting Standards for Angioplasty and Stent-Assisted Angioplasty for Intracranial Atherosclerosis
Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e348 - e365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. M. Chappell, J. M. Wardlaw, G. R. Young, J. H. Gillard, G. H. Roditi, B. Yip, J. P. Pell, P. M. Rothwell, M. M. Brown, M. J. Gough, et al.
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Noninvasive Tests--Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 493 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. Marquardt, W. Kuker, A. Chandratheva, O. Geraghty, and P. M. Rothwell
Incidence and prognosis of >=50% symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis: prospective population-based study
Brain, April 1, 2009; 132(4): 982 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. de Weerd, J. P. Greving, A. W.F. de Jong, E. Buskens, and M. L. Bots
Prevalence of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis According to Age and Sex: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis
Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1105 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.J. Fox, J. Millar, J. Raymond, J.C. Pryor, D. Roy, G.A. Tomlinson, J.P. McKay, and A.J. Molyneux
Dangerous Advances in Measurements from Digital Subtraction Angiography: When Is a Millimeter Not a Millimeter?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2009; 30(3): 459 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. N. Redgrave, P. Gallagher, J. K. Lovett, and P. M. Rothwell
Critical Cap Thickness and Rupture in Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: The Oxford Plaque Study
Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1722 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Bladin, A. V. Alexandrov, and J. Norris
Comparison of the Carotid Stenosis Index With CT Angiography
Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): e100 - e101.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. U-King-Im, M. J. Graves, J. J. Cross, N. J. Higgins, J. Wat, R. A. Trivedi, T. Tang, S. P. S. Howarth, P. J. Kirkpatrick, N. M. Antoun, et al.
Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Subjective Visual Impression for Evaluation with Digital Subtraction Angiography and Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 213 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Touze, J.-F. Toussaint, J. Coste, E. Schmitt, F. Bonneville, P. Vandermarcq, J.-Y. Gauvrit, F. Douvrin, J.-F. Meder, J.-L. Mas, et al.
Reproducibility of High-Resolution MRI for the Identification and the Quantification of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Components: Consequences for Prognosis Studies and Therapeutic Trials
Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1812 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox
Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Luengo-Fernandez, A. M. Gray, and P. M. Rothwell
Population-Based Study of Determinants of Initial Secondary Care Costs of Acute Stroke in the United Kingdom
Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2579 - 2587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R.L. Cuffe and P.M. Rothwell
Effect of Nonoptimal Imaging on the Relationship Between the Measured Degree of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1785 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J.N.E. Redgrave, J.K. Lovett, P.J. Gallagher, and P.M. Rothwell
Histological Assessment of 526 Symptomatic Carotid Plaques in Relation to the Nature and Timing of Ischemic Symptoms: The Oxford Plaque Study
Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): 2320 - 2328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Yurdakul, M. Tola, and T. Cumhur
B-flow Imaging for Assessment of 70% to 99% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Based on Residual Lumen Diameter
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2006; 25(2): 211 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. J. Fox, M. Eliasziw, P. M. Rothwell, M. H. Schmidt, C. P. Warlow, H. J.M. Barnett, and for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarte
Identification, Prognosis, and Management of Patients with Carotid Artery Near Occlusion
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2086 - 2094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. E. Heiserman
Measurement Error of Percent Diameter Carotid Stenosis Determined by Conventional Angiography: Implications for Noninvasive Evaluation
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2102 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Ota, K. Takase, H. Rikimaru, M. Tsuboi, T. Yamada, A. Sato, S. Higano, T. Ishibashi, and S. Takahashi
Quantitative Vascular Measurements in Arterial Occlusive Disease
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1141 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. Warmuth, M. Ruping, A. Forschler, H.-C. Koennecke, J. M. Valdueza, A. Kauert, S. J. Schreiber, R. Siekmann, and C. Zimmer
Dynamic Spin Labeling Angiography in Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1035 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
L. R. Sprouse II, G. H. Meier, F. N. Parent, R. J. DeMasi, C. J. LeSar, C. Nelms, K. Carter, M. J. Marcinczyk, R. G. Gayle, and B. Mendoza
Are We Undertreating Carotid Stenoses Diagnosed by Ultrasound Alone?
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2005; 39(2): 143 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. Arning
Surgery for carotid artery stenosis: Cut-off point is problematic in selecting patients for carotid surgery
BMJ, December 4, 2004; 329(7478): 1344 - 1344.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J.K. Lovett, P.J. Gallagher, L.J. Hands, J. Walton, and P.M. Rothwell
Histological Correlates of Carotid Plaque Surface Morphology on Lumen Contrast Imaging
Circulation, October 12, 2004; 110(15): 2190 - 2197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. M. K.S. U-King-Im, R. A. Trivedi, J. J. Cross, N. J.P. Higgins, W. Hollingworth, M. Graves, I. Joubert, P. J. Kirkpatrick, N. M. Antoun, and J. H. Gillard
Measuring Carotid Stenosis on Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Diagnostic Performance and Reproducibility of 3 Different Methods
Stroke, September 1, 2004; 35(9): 2083 - 2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. Iemolo, A. Martiniuk, D. A. Steinman, and J. D. Spence
Sex Differences in Carotid Plaque and Stenosis
Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 477 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P.M. Rothwell, S.C. Howard, and J.D. Spence
Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Stroke Risk in Patients With Symptomatic Carotid Occlusive Disease
Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2583 - 2590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Rothwell, S. A. Gutnikov, and C. P. Warlow
Reanalysis of the Final Results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial
Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 514 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S G Patel, D A Collie, J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, A R Wright, R J Gibson, and R J Sellar
Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2002; 73(1): 21 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
H. J.M. Barnett, H. E. Meldrum, and M. Eliasziw
The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 1, 2002; 166(9): 1169 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
U. G.R. Schulz and P. M. Rothwell
Major Variation in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy: A Possible Risk Factor for Plaque Development?
Stroke, November 1, 2001; 32(11): 2522 - 2529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Dietz, J. Berkefeld, J. G. Theron, T. Schmitz-Rixen, F. E. Zanella, B. Turowski, H. Steinmetz, and M. Sitzer
Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis Using Stent Placement: Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With a Balanced Surgical Risk/Benefit Ratio
Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1855 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
U. G.R. Schulz and P. M. Rothwell
Sex Differences in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy and the Distribution of Atherosclerotic Plaque
Stroke, July 1, 2001; 32(7): 1525 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
H. J. M. Barnett and J. P. Broderick
Carotid endarterectomy: Another wake-up call
Neurology, September 26, 2000; 55(6): 746 - 747.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Rothwell, R. Gibson, and C. P. Warlow
Interrelation Between Plaque Surface Morphology and Degree of Stenosis on Carotid Angiograms and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, March 1, 2000; 31(3): 615 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Rothwell and C. P. Warlow
Low Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Reduced Internal Carotid Artery Lumen Diameter Distal to Severe Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis : Cerebral Protection Due to Low Poststenotic Flow?
Stroke, March 1, 2000; 31(3): 622 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
E. Y. Lam and G. L. Moneta
NASCET, ECST, ACAS-Who Should Undergo Operation?
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 2000; 34(1): 1 - 4.
[PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. W. Albers, R. G. Hart, H. L. Lutsep, D. W. Newell, and R. L. Sacco
Supplement to the Guidelines for the Management of Transient Ischemic Attacks : A Statement From the Ad Hoc Committee on Guidelines for the Management of Transient Ischemic Attacks, Stroke Council, American Heart Association
Stroke, November 1, 1999; 30(11): 2502 - 2511.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. P. Spencer, C. Ranke, H.-J. Trappe, A. Creutzig, and H. Becker
Standardization of Carotid Ultrasound • Response
Stroke, June 1, 1999; 30(6): 1286 - 1295.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Nuzzaci, D. Righi, F. Borgioli, I. Nuzzaci, G. Giannico, C. Pratesi, R. Pulli, E. Chiti, and F. Gori
Duplex Scanning Exploration of the Ophthalmic Artery for the Detection of the Hemodynamically Significant ICA Stenosis
Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 821 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Ranke, A. Creutzig, H. Becker, and H.-J. Trappe
Standardization of Carotid Ultrasound : A Hemodynamic Method to Normalize for Interindividual and Interequipment Variability
Stroke, February 1, 1999; 30(2): 402 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. J.M. Barnett, D. W. Taylor, M. Eliasziw, A. J. Fox, G. G. Ferguson, R. B. Haynes, R. N. Rankin, G. P. Clagett, V. C. Hachinski, D. L. Sackett, et al.
Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate or Severe Stenosis
N. Engl. J. Med., November 12, 1998; 339(20): 1415 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Yao, M. R. H. M. van Sambeek, A. Dall'Agata, L. C. van Dijk, M. Kozakova, P. J. Koudstaal, and J. R. T. C. Roelandt
Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Study of Carotid Arteries Before and After Endarterectomy : Analysis of Stenotic Lesions and Surgical Impact on the Vessel
Stroke, October 1, 1998; 29(10): 2026 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
J. W Olin, C. Fonseca, M. B. Childs, M. R Piedmonte, N. R Hertzer, and J. R Young
The natural history of asymptomatic moderate internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex ultrasound
Vascular Medicine, May 1, 1998; 3(2): 101 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
Managing carotid stenosis
DTB, February 1, 1998; 36(2): 9 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. W. J. Dippel, F. van Kooten, S. L. M. Bakker, and P. J. Koudstaal
Interobserver Agreement for 10% Categories of Angiographic Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, December 1, 1997; 28(12): 2483 - 2485.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. Steinke, S. Ries, N. Artemis, A. Schwartz, and M. Hennerici
Power Doppler Imaging of Carotid Artery Stenosis : Comparison With Color Doppler Flow Imaging and Angiography
Stroke, October 1, 1997; 28(10): 1981 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. Crawley, A. Clifton, H. Markus, and M. M. Brown
Delayed Improvement in Carotid Artery Diameter After Carotid Angioplasty
Stroke, March 1, 1997; 28(3): 574 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G.R. Young, P.R.D. Humphrey, T.E. Nixon, and E.T.S. Smith
Variability in Measurement of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis as Displayed by Both Digital Subtraction and Magnetic Resonance Angiography : An Assessment of Three Caliper Techniques and Visual Impression of Stenosis
Stroke, March 1, 1996; 27(3): 467 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid A, --National Institute of Neurological Disorders and, M. D. Walker, J. R. Marler, M. Goldstein, P. A. Grady, J. F. Toole, W. H. Baker, J. E. Castaldo, L. E. Chambless, et al.
Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis
JAMA, May 10, 1995; 273(18): 1421 - 1428.
[Abstract] [PDF]