Stroke, Vol 25, 2523-2524, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association
The investigators of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS)
are reporting the interim results of a randomized controlled clinical trial
of carotid endarterectomy in patients who have asymptomatic carotid
stenosis of greater than 60% reduction in diameter. In addition to aspirin
and aggressive management of modifiable risk factors, one half of the
patients were randomly assigned to receive surgery after angiographic
confirmation of the lesion. Carotid endarterectomy is beneficial with a
statistically significant absolute reduction of 5.8% in the risk of the
primary end point of stroke within 5 years and a relative risk reduction of
55%. As a consequence of the trial reaching statistical significance in
favor of endarterectomy, and on the recommendation of the study's data
monitoring committee, physicians participating in the study were
immediately notified and advised to reevaluate patients who did not receive
surgery. It is important to note that the success of the operation is
dependent on medical centers and surgeons who have a documented
perioperative morbidity and mortality of less than 3%, careful selection of
patients, and postoperative management of modifiable risk factors.
ARTICLES
Clinical advisory: carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S Macdonald, A Dixit, and M G Wyatt "Brain attack" BMJ, April 1, 2009; 338(apr01_4): a3109 - a3109. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Lin Commentary on "Carotid Artery Stenting Will Replace Carotid Endarterectomy" Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 228 - 230. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Dibbins Legacy Arch Surg, April 1, 2004; 139(4): 362 - 365. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cremonesi, R. Manetti, F. Setacci, C. Setacci, and F. Castriota Protected Carotid Stenting: Clinical Advantages and Complications of Embolic Protection Devices in 442 Consecutive Patients Stroke, August 1, 2003; 34(8): 1936 - 1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kastrup, K. Groschel, H. Krapf, B. R. Brehm, J. Dichgans, and J. B. Schulz Early Outcome of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting With and Without Cerebral Protection Devices: A Systematic Review of the Literature Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 813 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Muller-Hulsbeck, J. Grimm, C. Liess, J. Hedderich, M. Bergmeyer, and M. Heller Comparison and Modification of Two Cerebral Protection Devices Used for Carotid Angioplasty: In Vitro Experiment Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 289 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. AbuRahma, T. G. Jennings, J. T. Wulu, L. Tarakji, and P. A. Robinson Redo Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Primary Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, December 1, 2001; 32(12): 2787 - 2792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Feasby, H. Quan, W. A. Ghali, and J. M. Findlay Geographic Variation in the Rate of Carotid Endarterectomy in Canada Editorial Comment Stroke, October 1, 2001; 32(10): 2417 - 2422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Criado, E. P. Wilson, F. M. Zaman, R. J. Falconer, and D. Sabet-Payman Access Strategies for Endovascular Intervention in the Carotid Artery: Does the Direct Cervical Approach Have A Role? Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 2000; 13(1): 23 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Tu, E. L. Hannan, G. M. Anderson, K. Iron, K. Wu, K. Vranizan, A. J. Popp, and K. Grumbach The Fall and Rise of Carotid Endarterectomy in the United States and Canada N. Engl. J. Med., November 12, 1998; 339(20): 1441 - 1447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W Olin, C. Fonseca, M. B. Childs, M. R Piedmonte, N. R Hertzer, and J. R Young The natural history of asymptomatic moderate internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex ultrasound Vascular Medicine, May 1, 1998; 3(2): 101 - 108. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Wong, J. M. Findlay, and M. E. Suarez-Almazor Regional Performance of Carotid Endarterectomy : Appropriateness, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Complications Stroke, May 1, 1997; 28(5): 891 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Silvestrini, E. Troisi, M. Matteis, L. M. Cupini, and C. Caltagirone Transcranial Doppler Assessment of Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis Stroke, November 1, 1996; 27(11): 1970 - 1973. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Beebe, J. P. Archie, W. H. Baker, R. W. Barnes, G. J. Becker, E. F. Bernstein, B. Brener, G. P. Clagett, A. W. Clowes, J. P. Cooke, et al. Concern About Safety of Carotid Angioplasty Stroke, February 1, 1996; 27(2): 197 - 198. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Samra, P. Dorje, G. B. Zelenock, and J. C. Stanley Cerebral Oximetry in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy Under Regional Anesthesia Stroke, January 1, 1996; 27(1): 49 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Siebler, A. Nachtmann, M. Sitzer, G. Rose, A. Kleinschmidt, J. Rademacher, and H. Steinmetz Cerebral Microembolism and the Risk of Ischemia in Asymptomatic High-Grade Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Stroke, November 1, 1995; 26(11): 2184 - 2186. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Napel, H. Xu, D. S. Paik, B. A. Ross, T. S. Sumanaweera, J. A. Hossack, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr Carotid Disease: Automated Analysis with Cardiac-gated Three-dimensional US—Technique and Preliminary Results Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 560 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1994 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |