Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1995;26:1753-1758

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kent, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kent, K. C.

(Stroke. 1995;26:1753-1758.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Preoperative Assessment of the Carotid Bifurcation

Can Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Duplex Ultrasonography Replace Contrast Arteriography?

Mahesh R. Patel, MD; Karen M. Kuntz, ScD; Roman A. Klufas, MD; Ducksoo Kim, MD; Jonathan Kramer, MD; Joseph F. Polak, MD; John J. Skillman, MD; Anthony D. Whittemore, MD; Robert R. Edelman, MD K. Craig Kent, MD

From the Departments of Radiology (M.R.P., D.K., J.K., R.R.E.) and Surgery (K.C.K., J.J.S.), Beth Israel Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine (K.M.K.), Radiology (R.A.K., J.F.P.), and Surgery (A.D.W.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Background and Purpose Noninvasive studies are used with increasing frequency to assess the carotid bifurcation before endarterectomy. Therefore, assessment of their diagnostic accuracies is essential for appropriate patient management. We prospectively evaluate two noninvasive tests, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and duplex ultrasonography (DU), as potential replacements for contrast arteriography (CA).

Methods A blinded comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA, two-dimensional TOF MRA, and DU in 176 arteries was performed. CA was used as the standard of comparison.

Results Three-dimensional TOF MRA had a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 85%, and an accuracy of 88% for the identification of 70% to 99% stenosis; two-dimensional TOF MRA had a sensitivity and specificity that were approximately 10% lower than those of three-dimensional TOF MRA. DU resulted in a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 83%, and an accuracy of 86%. Combining data from three-dimensional TOF MRA and DU, allowing for CA only for disparate results, yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 91%, and an accuracy of 94% among concordant noninvasive tests, with CA required in 16% of arteries. MRA accurately differentiated 17 carotid occlusions from 16 high-grade (90% to 99%) stenoses, whereas with DU two patent arteries were identified as occluded and one occluded artery was identified as patent.

Conclusions Three-dimensional TOF MRA is the most accurate noninvasive test. Combined use of MRA and DU results in a marked increase in accuracy to a level that obviates the need for CA in a majority of patients.


Key Words: carotid endarterectomy • carotid stenosis • diagnostic imaging • duplex scanning • magnetic resonance imaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. M. Debrey, H. Yu, J. K. Lynch, K.-O. Lovblad, V. L. Wright, S.-J. D. Janket, and A. E. Baird
Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Internal Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2237 - 2248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. S. Coselli and S. A. LeMaire
Descending and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1277 - 1298.
[Full Text]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
E. R. Bates, C. J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, W. A. Gray, K. Ouriel, E. D. Peterson, K. Rosenfield, et al.
ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting)
Vascular Medicine, February 1, 2007; 12(1): 35 - 83.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. M. Groves, W. Bireley, K. Dill, T. J. Carroll, and J. C. Carr
Quantitative Analysis of ECG-Gated High-Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Thoracic Aorta
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 522 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic N, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, E. R. Bates, J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey Jr, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, et al.
ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2007; 49(1): 126 - 170.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.S. Turk, K.M. Johnson, D. Lum, D. Niemann, B. Aagaard-Kienitz, D. Consigny, J. Grinde, P. Turski, V. Haughton, and C. Mistretta
Physiologic and Anatomic Assessment of a Canine Carotid Artery Stenosis Model Utilizing Phase Contrast with Vastly Undersampled Isotropic Projection Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 111 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
P. L. Faries, R. A. Chaer, S. Patel, S. C. Lin, B. DeRubertis, and K. C. Kent
Current Management of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, May 1, 2006; 40(3): 165 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
G. Aidinian, J. M. Weiswasser, S. Arora, C. J. Abularrage, N. Singh, and A. N. Sidawy
Carotid Plaque Morphologic Characteristics
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, March 1, 2006; 18(1): 63 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Mitra, D Connolly, S Jenkins, P English, D Birchall, C Mandel, K Shrikanth, B Gregson, and A Gholkar
Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis.
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 201 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. W. Yang, J. C. Carr, S. F. Futterer, M. D. Morasch, B. P. Yang, S. M. Shors, and J. P. Finn
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid and Vertebrobasilar Circulations
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2095 - 2101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Berg, Z. Zhang, A. Ikonen, P. Sipola, R. Kalviainen, H. Manninen, and R. Vanninen
Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography in the Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease in Symptomatic Patients: Comparison with Rotational Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1022 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. R. Davies, J. H. Rudd, and P. L. Weissberg
Molecular and Metabolic Imaging of Atherosclerosis
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1898 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. K. DeMarco, J. Huston III, and M. A. Bernstein
Evaluation of Classic 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in the Depiction of Severe Carotid Stenosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 787 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos
Noninvasive Carotid Imaging
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. Kennedy, H. Quan, W. A. Ghali, and T. E. Feasby
Importance of the imaging modality in decision making about carotid endarterectomy
Neurology, March 23, 2004; 62(6): 901 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
I. Borisch, M. Horn, B. Butz, N. Zorger, B. Draganski, T. Hoelscher, U. Bogdahn, and J. Link
Preoperative Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Duplex Sonography with Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1117 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Cosottini, A. Pingitore, M. Puglioli, M. C. Michelassi, G. Lupi, A. Abbruzzese, R. Calabrese, M. Lombardi, G. Parenti, and C. Bartolozzi
Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Atherosclerotic Internal Carotid Stenosis as the Noninvasive Imaging Modality in Revascularization Decision Making
Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 660 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. S. Coselli and P. L. Moreno
Descending and Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1169 - 1190.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. C. Carr, J. Ma, V. Desphande, S. Pereles, G. Laub, and J. P. Finn
High-Resolution Breath-Hold Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Entire Carotid Circulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 543 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
U. G.R. Schulz and P. M. Rothwell
Major Variation in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy: A Possible Risk Factor for Plaque Development?
Stroke, November 1, 2001; 32(11): 2522 - 2529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. C.C. Johnston and L. B. Goldstein
Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography
Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 1009 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
G. Melissano, R. Castellano, R. Zucca, and R. Chiesa
Results of Carotid Endarterectomy Performed with Preoperative Duplex Ultrasound Assessment Alone
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2001; 35(2): 95 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Koga, K. Kimura, K. Minematsu, and T. Yamaguchi
Diagnosis of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Greater than 70% with Power Doppler Duplex Sonography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 413 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. H. III, S. B. Fain, J. T. Wald, P. H. Luetmer, C. H. Rydberg, D. J. Covarrubias, S. J. Riederer, M. A. Bernstein, R. D. Brown, F. B. Meyer, et al.
Carotid Artery: Elliptic Centric Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography Compared with Conventional Angiography
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 138 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. B. Anderson, R. Ashforth, D. E. Steinke, R. Ferdinandy, and J. M. Findlay
CT Angiography for the Detection and Characterization of Carotid Artery Bifurcation Disease
Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31(9): 2168 - 2174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Serfaty, P. Chirossel, J. M. Chevallier, R. Ecochard, J. C. Froment, and P. C. Douek
Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Angiography in the Assessment of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 455 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. E. H. Elgersma, A. F. J. Wüst, P. C. Buijs, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, and W. P. T. M. Mali
Multidirectional Depiction of Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: Three-dimensional Time-of-Flight MR Angiography versus Rotational and Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 511 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Rothwell, S. T. Pendlebury, J. Wardlaw, and C. P. Warlow
Critical Appraisal of the Design and Reporting of Studies of Imaging and Measurement of Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1444 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. E. H. Elgersma, P. C. Buijs, A. F. J. Wüst, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, and W. P. T. M. Mali
Maximum Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: Assessment with Rotational Angiography versus Conventional Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 777 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce
Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. H. III, S. B. Fain, S. J. Riederer, A. H. Wilman, M. A. Bernstein, and R. F. Busse
Carotid Arteries: Maximizing Arterial to Venous Contrast in Fluoroscopically Triggered Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography with Elliptic Centric View Ordering
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 265 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DTBHome page
Managing carotid stenosis
DTB, February 1, 1998; 36(2): 9 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
R. M. Zwolak
Carotid Endarterectomy Without Angiography: Are We Ready?
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 1997; 31(1): 1 - 9.
[PDF]