(Stroke. 1995;26:2031-2034.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Role of Stroke Rehabilitation Units in Managing Severe Disability After Stroke
From the Orpington Stroke Unit, Centre for Clinical and Health Service Studies, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Correspondence to Prof L. Kalra, Orpington Hospital, Sevenoaks Rd, Orpington BR6 9JU, UK.
Background and Purpose Stroke unit rehabilitation tends to be directed toward stroke patients with moderately severe disabilities ("the middle group"). Data collected on a stroke rehabilitation unit, however, showed improving outcome over 3 years in patients with a poor prognosis (discharge home: 48% versus 16%, P<.02; discharge Barthel Index score: 9 versus 6, P<.05). The hypothesis that stroke rehabilitation units may improve outcome in severely disabled stroke patients was tested in this study.
Methods A randomized controlled study was undertaken in 71 patients with a poor prognosis who were treated either on a stroke rehabilitation unit (n=34) or on general wards (n=37) to compare outcome between the two groups. Data collected were also compared with those from a methodologically similar study undertaken 3 years ago.
Results Severe stroke patients treated on the stroke rehabilitation unit had a significantly better outcome compared with general wards (mortality: 21% versus 46%, P<.05; discharge home 47% versus 19%, P<.01; median length of hospital stay: 43 versus 59 days, P<.02). The number of stroke unit patients being discharged home had increased significantly from the previous study, with a trend toward improvement in median discharge Barthel Index score.
Conclusions Stroke rehabilitation units may improve outcome in severe stroke patients. This improvement appears to be due to the development of innovative management strategies that reduce mortality and institutionalization and enable caregivers to support more disabled stroke patients at home.
Key Words: hospitalization • outcome • rehabilitation • stroke units
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  N.J.A. van Exel, M.A. Koopmanschap, W. Scholte op Reimer, L.W. Niessen, and R. Huijsman Cost-effectiveness of integrated stroke services QJM, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 415 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Hanley and W. Hacke Critical Care and Emergency Medicine Neurology in Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 205 - 207. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J.A.M. van Putten and D. L.J. Tavy Continuous Quantitative EEG Monitoring in Hemispheric Stroke Patients Using the Brain Symmetry Index Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2489 - 2492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Stone Stroke units BMJ, August 10, 2002; 325(7359): 291 - 292. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Stavem and O.M. Ronning Survival of unselected stroke patients in a stroke unit compared with conventional care QJM, March 1, 2002; 95(3): 143 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Evans, F. Harraf, N. Donaldson, and L. Kalra Randomized Controlled Study of Stroke Unit Care Versus Stroke Team Care in Different Stroke Subtypes Stroke, February 1, 2002; 33(2): 449 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Langhorne and P. Duncan Does the Organization of Postacute Stroke Care Really Matter? Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 268 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Fagerberg, L. Claesson, G. Gosman-Hedstrom, and C. Blomstrand Effect of Acute Stroke Unit Care Integrated With Care Continuum Versus Conventional Treatment: A Randomized 1-Year Study of Elderly Patients : The Goteborg 70+ Stroke Study Stroke, November 1, 2000; 31(11): 2578 - 2584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. G. Schmidt, J. Drew-Cates, and M. L. Dombovy Severe Disability After Stroke: Outcome After Inpatient Rehabilitation Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 1999; 13(3): 199 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Berg and O. Intrator Postacute Care Following Stroke or Hip Fracture: Single Services and Combinations Used by Medicare Beneficiaries (1987-1992) J Aging Health, February 1, 1999; 11(1): 27 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. M. Ronning and B. Guldvog Outcome of Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation : A Randomized Controlled Trial Stroke, April 1, 1998; 29(4): 779 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Unit Trialists' Collaboration How Do Stroke Units Improve Patient Outcomes? : A Collaborative Systematic Review of the Randomized Trials Stroke, November 1, 1997; 28(11): 2139 - 2144. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Kalra, I. Perez, S. Gupta, and M. Wittink The Influence of Visual Neglect on Stroke Rehabilitation Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1386 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|