Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1995;26:2044-2047

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Markus, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Markus, H.

(Stroke. 1995;26:2044-2047.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Importance of Time-Window Overlap in the Detection and Analysis of Embolic Signals

Hugh Markus, MRCP, DM

From the Department of Neurology, King's College Hospital School of Medicine and Dentistry, and the Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.

Correspondence to Dr Hugh Markus, Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Background and Purpose The detection of asymptomatic embolic signals by Doppler ultrasound may offer a powerful investigational tool in the management of cerebrovascular disease. However, early studies, particularly in patients with carotid artery disease, have reported very different frequencies of embolic signals. While this may reflect differences in patient groups and the criteria used for embolic signal identification, the degree of time-window overlap may be important. If this is insufficient, some embolic signals may fall between two time windows and not appear on the spectral display. Furthermore, the use of nonrectangular time windows, such as the Hanning window, may result in variation of the intensity of an embolic signal depending on where it is detected within the time window.

Methods To test the importance of this potential problem, the same 25 embolic signals recorded as the audio signal on digital audiotape were each played repeatedly through a transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) system using fast Fourier transform analysis. An older system with no time-window overlap was used, and a more modern system was also used in which three different degrees of overlap were used: -9%, 27%, and 57%. The number of signals audible but not appearing on the spectral display was recorded. The variability in the relative intensity increase for the same embolic signal played repeatedly was estimated by calculating the coefficient of variation of the relative intensity increase.

Results With the older system, 39/500 (7.8%) of embolic signals were missed. With the newer system, the number of embolic signals missed was fewer and decreased with increasing degrees of overlap (10/500 for -9% overlap, 1/500 for 27% overlap, and 0/500 for 57% overlap). For those setups in which embolic signals were missed, there was a highly significant relationship between duration of embolic signal and number of signals missed. In parallel with these results, the coefficient of variation of the relative intensity increase became progressively less with increasing degrees of time-window overlap. For all processing setups, the coefficient of variation was greater for the less intense and shorter duration signals, but this dependence, as estimated by the slope of the regression line, became less strong with higher degrees of overlap.

Conclusions Inadequate degrees of fast Fourier transform time-window overlap will result in the failure of current TCD machines to detect embolic signals. Furthermore, this and the time windowing currently usually used may result in variability in the relative intensity increase of identical embolic signals. These factors need to be taken into account when comparing data on the frequencies of embolic signals recorded by different researchers and in the design of future TCD equipment.


Key Words: cerebral embolism • ultrasonics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Gao, K. S. Wong, T. Hansberg, W. W. M. Lam, D. W. Droste, and E. B. Ringelstein
Microembolic Signal Predicts Recurrent Cerebral Ischemic Events in Acute Stroke Patients With Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis
Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2832 - 2836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Bernd Ringelstein, D. W. Droste, V. L. Babikian, D. H. Evans, D. G. Grosset, M. Kaps, H. S. Markus, D. Russell, and M. Siebler
Consensus on Microembolus Detection by TCD
Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 725 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
L Valton, V Larrue, A P. Le Traon, and G Geraud
Cerebral microembolism in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack as a risk factor for early recurrence
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 1997; 63(6): 784 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. S. Markus and J. Molloy
Use of a Decibel Threshold in Detecting Doppler Embolic Signals
Stroke, April 1, 1997; 28(4): 692 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H.-C. Koennecke, H. Mast, S. S. Trocio Jr, R. L. Sacco, J. L. P. Thompson, and J. P. Mohr
Microemboli in Patients With Vertebrobasilar Ischemia : Association With Vertebrobasilar and Cardiac Lesions
Stroke, March 1, 1997; 28(3): 593 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. V. Van Zuilen, W. H. Mess, C. Jansen, I. Van Der Tweel, J. Van Gijn, and R. G.A. Ackerstaff
Automatic Embolus Detection Compared With Human Experts: A Doppler Ultrasound Study
Stroke, October 1, 1996; 27(10): 1840 - 1843.
[Abstract] [Full Text]