(Stroke. 1995;26:2044-2047.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Neurology, King's College Hospital School of Medicine and Dentistry, and the Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Hugh Markus, Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Background and Purpose The detection of asymptomatic embolic signals by Doppler ultrasound may offer a powerful investigational tool in the management of cerebrovascular disease. However, early studies, particularly in patients with carotid artery disease, have reported very different frequencies of embolic signals. While this may reflect differences in patient groups and the criteria used for embolic signal identification, the degree of time-window overlap may be important. If this is insufficient, some embolic signals may fall between two time windows and not appear on the spectral display. Furthermore, the use of nonrectangular time windows, such as the Hanning window, may result in variation of the intensity of an embolic signal depending on where it is detected within the time window.
Methods To test the importance of this potential problem, the same 25 embolic signals recorded as the audio signal on digital audiotape were each played repeatedly through a transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) system using fast Fourier transform analysis. An older system with no time-window overlap was used, and a more modern system was also used in which three different degrees of overlap were used: -9%, 27%, and 57%. The number of signals audible but not appearing on the spectral display was recorded. The variability in the relative intensity increase for the same embolic signal played repeatedly was estimated by calculating the coefficient of variation of the relative intensity increase.
Results With the older system, 39/500 (7.8%) of embolic signals were missed. With the newer system, the number of embolic signals missed was fewer and decreased with increasing degrees of overlap (10/500 for -9% overlap, 1/500 for 27% overlap, and 0/500 for 57% overlap). For those setups in which embolic signals were missed, there was a highly significant relationship between duration of embolic signal and number of signals missed. In parallel with these results, the coefficient of variation of the relative intensity increase became progressively less with increasing degrees of time-window overlap. For all processing setups, the coefficient of variation was greater for the less intense and shorter duration signals, but this dependence, as estimated by the slope of the regression line, became less strong with higher degrees of overlap.
Conclusions Inadequate degrees of fast Fourier transform time-window overlap will result in the failure of current TCD machines to detect embolic signals. Furthermore, this and the time windowing currently usually used may result in variability in the relative intensity increase of identical embolic signals. These factors need to be taken into account when comparing data on the frequencies of embolic signals recorded by different researchers and in the design of future TCD equipment.
Key Words: cerebral embolism ultrasonics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Gao, K. S. Wong, T. Hansberg, W. W. M. Lam, D. W. Droste, and E. B. Ringelstein Microembolic Signal Predicts Recurrent Cerebral Ischemic Events in Acute Stroke Patients With Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2832 - 2836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bernd Ringelstein, D. W. Droste, V. L. Babikian, D. H. Evans, D. G. Grosset, M. Kaps, H. S. Markus, D. Russell, and M. Siebler Consensus on Microembolus Detection by TCD Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 725 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Valton, V Larrue, A P. Le Traon, and G Geraud Cerebral microembolism in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack as a risk factor for early recurrence J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 1997; 63(6): 784 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Markus and J. Molloy Use of a Decibel Threshold in Detecting Doppler Embolic Signals Stroke, April 1, 1997; 28(4): 692 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Koennecke, H. Mast, S. S. Trocio Jr, R. L. Sacco, J. L. P. Thompson, and J. P. Mohr Microemboli in Patients With Vertebrobasilar Ischemia : Association With Vertebrobasilar and Cardiac Lesions Stroke, March 1, 1997; 28(3): 593 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Van Zuilen, W. H. Mess, C. Jansen, I. Van Der Tweel, J. Van Gijn, and R. G.A. Ackerstaff Automatic Embolus Detection Compared With Human Experts: A Doppler Ultrasound Study Stroke, October 1, 1996; 27(10): 1840 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |