(Stroke. 1995;26:230-234.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Carotid Stenosis Index
A New Method of Measuring Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
Presented in part at the American Heart Association 19th International Conference on Stroke and the Cerebral Circulation, San Diego, Calif, February 17-19, 1994.
From the Stroke Research Unit (C.F.B., A.V.A., J.W.N.), and the Departments of Radiology (J.M.) and Vascular Surgery (R.M.), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
Correspondence to C.F. Bladin, MD, Stroke Research Unit, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Canada M4N 3M5.
Background and Purpose Current methods of measuring carotid stenosis such as those used in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) have limitations caused by difficulties in measuring the normal width of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) or the carotid bulb.
Methods We developed a new technique, the Carotid Stenosis Index (CSI), based on the known anatomic relationship between the common carotid artery (CCA) and ICA (1.2xCCA diameter=proximal ICA diameter). The normal ICA diameter can therefore be calculated from direct measurement of the CCA. Three blinded observers evaluated the angiograms of 57 patients (114 carotid arteries), previously screened with duplex ultrasonography, using the NASCET, ECST, and CSI methods. In a subset of 30 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, comparison was also made to computerized carotid plaque planimetry.
Results The NASCET method could only be applied correctly in 89% and the ECST method in 95% of cases because of overlying vessels or inadequate views of the distal ICA or carotid bulb. An additional 9% of NASCET cases had a "negative" stenosis, in which the stenosis is wider than the distal ICA. The CSI method was applicable in 99% of cases. Interobserver comparison using ANOVA revealed significant differences using NASCET (P<.0001) and ECST (P<.001) but not CSI (P=NS). NASCET had a sevenfold variation (P<.01) and ECST a twofold variation (P<.01) in results compared with CSI . The intraobserver reliability was 0.87 for NASCET, 0.86 for ECST, and 0.90 for CSI. However, the 95% confidence intervals for an individual measurement by an observer were ±30% for NASCET, ±19% for ECST, and ±15% for CSI. With linear methods of measurement there were significant differences between NASCET and CSI (P<.0001) and ECST (P<.0001) but not between CSI and ECST. A comparison of area derivations of these methods to carotid plaque planimetry revealed significant differences from NASCET (P<.0001) but not ECST, CSI, or duplex methods. A CSI nomogram was created, allowing measurement of both linear and area percent stenosis.
Conclusions CSI is the most reliable validated method of measuring carotid stenosis, and it correlates with duplex and carotid pathology.
Key Words: carotid stenosis • ultrasonics, duplex • angiography
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  C. Setacci, E. Chisci, F. Setacci, F. Iacoponi, and G. de Donato Grading Carotid Intrastent Restenosis: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1189 - 1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Bladin, A. V. Alexandrov, and J. Norris Comparison of the Carotid Stenosis Index With CT Angiography Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): e100 - e101. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Response to Letter by Bladin et al Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): e102 - e102. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. H. Walpoth, P. Zammaretti, M. Cikirikcioglu, E. Khabiri, M. K. Djebaili, J.-C. Pache, J.-C. Tille, Y. Aggoun, D. Morel, A. Kalangos, et al. Enhanced intimal thickening of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts coated with fibrin or fibrin-releasing vascular endothelial growth factor in the pig carotid artery interposition model J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1163 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Rothwell, S. T. Pendlebury, J. Wardlaw, and C. P. Warlow Critical Appraisal of the Design and Reporting of Studies of Imaging and Measurement of Carotid Stenosis Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1444 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Steinke, S. Ries, N. Artemis, A. Schwartz, and M. Hennerici Power Doppler Imaging of Carotid Artery Stenosis : Comparison With Color Doppler Flow Imaging and Angiography Stroke, October 1, 1997; 28(10): 1981 - 1987. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Alexandrov, D. S. Brodie, A. McLean, P. Hamilton, J. Murphy, and P. N. Burns Correlation of Peak Systolic Velocity and Angiographic Measurement of Carotid Stenosis Revisited Stroke, February 1, 1997; 28(2): 339 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Suwanwela, U. Can, K. L. Furie, J. F. Southern, N. R. Macdonald, C. S. Ogilvy, C. J. Hansen, F. S. Buonanno, W. M. Abbott, W. J. Koroshetz, et al. Carotid Doppler Ultrasound Criteria for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Based on Residual Lumen Diameter Calculated From En Bloc Carotid Endarterectomy Specimens Stroke, November 1, 1996; 27(11): 1965 - 1969. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. F. Bladin, A. C.F. Colchester, D. J. Hawkes, A. M. Seifalian, N. Iqbal, and C. R. Hardingham Morphological and Hemodynamic Assessments of Carotid Stenosis Using Quantitative Digital Subtraction Angiography Stroke, September 1, 1996; 27(9): 1672 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G.R. Young, P.R.D. Humphrey, T.E. Nixon, and E.T.S. Smith Variability in Measurement of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis as Displayed by Both Digital Subtraction and Magnetic Resonance Angiography : An Assessment of Three Caliper Techniques and Visual Impression of Stenosis Stroke, March 1, 1996; 27(3): 467 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|