Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1995;26:1577-1581

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, X.
Right arrow Articles by Leys, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, X.
Right arrow Articles by Leys, D.

(Stroke. 1995;26:1577-1581.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Computed Tomographic Angiography for the Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis

X. Leclerc, MD; O. Godefroy, MD; J. P. Pruvo, MD D. Leys, MD

From the Departments of Radiology (X.L., J.P.P.) and Neurology (O.G., D.L.), University Hospital of Lille (France).

Correspondence to X. Leclerc, MD, Service de Neuroradiologie, Hôpital B, F-59037, Lille, France.

Background and Purpose No previous study has compared the reliability of carotid artery measurement provided by axial images, shaded surface display (SSD), and maximum intensity projection (MIP).

Methods Helical CT and conventional angiography were performed prospectively in 20 patients with atherosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Stenosis measurement was performed in a blinded fashion on angiography and CT by two independent examiners. Calcifications were segmented when they were located far enough from the vascular lumen. SSD and MIP were systematically performed for each carotid bifurcation. We measured stenosis using conventional angiography as standard and the different CT reconstructions (axial images, SSD, and MIP) by comparing the stenosis diameter at its narrowest point to the normal internal carotid artery. The degree of stenosis was classified into six groups: no stenosis, mild stenosis (<30%), moderate stenosis (30% to 70%), severe stenosis (>70%), near occlusion, and occlusion (100%). No measurement was made in cases of normal artery, near occlusion, and occlusion.

Results Correlations between angiography and the three types of reconstruction were very good. Axial sections correctly classified the carotid arteries in 95% of cases. In 10 carotid arteries, stenosis was not assessable by SSD and MIP because of calcifications. In the remaining carotid arteries, MIP correctly classified the degree of stenosis in 96% of cases, whereas SSD misclassified 21% of cases.

Conclusions Our study showed that axial images provide a reliable evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Calcifications are limiting factors in SSD or MIP. When atherosclerotic plaques are not calcified, MIP reconstructions provide a more reliable measurement of the vascular lumen than SSD.


Key Words: carotid arteries • computed tomography • stenosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. J. Fox, S. P. Symons, R. I. Aviv, P. Howard, R. Yeung, and E. S. Bartlett
Should Modeling Methodology Suppress Anatomic Excellence?
Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3411 - 3412.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. Gonzalez, and M.H. Lev
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining >=70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 761 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Wintermark, S.S. Jawadi, J.H. Rapp, T. Tihan, E. Tong, D.V. Glidden, S. Abedin, S. Schaeffer, G. Acevedo-Bolton, B. Boudignon, et al.
High-Resolution CT Imaging of Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 875 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Saba and G. Mallarini
MDCTA of Carotid Plaque Degree of Stenosis: Evaluation of Interobserver Agreement
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W41 - W46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox
Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. K. Fishman, D. R. Ney, D. G. Heath, F. M. Corl, K. M. Horton, and P. T. Johnson
Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why.
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 905 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox
Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 632 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Bartlett, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox
Correlation of Carotid Stenosis Diameter and Cross-Sectional Areas with CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 638 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox
Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 13 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
B.B. Ertl-Wagner, R. Bruening, J. Blume, R.-T. Hoffmann, S. Mueller-Schunk, B. Snyder, and M.F. Reiser
Relative Value of Sliding-Thin-Slab Multiplanar Reformations and Sliding-Thin-Slab Maximum Intensity Projections as Reformatting Techniques in Multisection CT Angiography of the Cervicocranial Vessels
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 107 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Berg, Z. Zhang, A. Ikonen, P. Sipola, R. Kalviainen, H. Manninen, and R. Vanninen
Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography in the Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease in Symptomatic Patients: Comparison with Rotational Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1022 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. J.W. Koelemay, P. J. Nederkoorn, J. B. Reitsma, and C. B. Majoie
Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease
Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2306 - 2312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos
Noninvasive Carotid Imaging
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, and T. Yamauchi
Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1313 - 1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. H. Lev, J. M. Romero, D. N.F. Goodman, R. Bagga, H. Y. K. Kim, N. A. Clerk, R. H. Ackerman, and R. G. Gonzalez
Total Occlusion versus Hairline Residual Lumen of the Internal Carotid Arteries: Accuracy of Single Section Helical CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1123 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. J. Walker, A. Ismail, W. McMeekin, D. Lambert, A. D. Mendelow, and D. Birchall
Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque: Correlation With Histopathology of Endarterectomy Specimens
Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 977 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. A. Addis, K. D. Hopper, T. A. Iyriboz, Y. Liu, S. W. Wise, C. J. Kasales, J. S. Blebea, and D. T. Mauger
CT Angiography: In Vitro Comparison of Five Reconstruction Methods
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1171 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Porsche, L. Walker, D. Mendelow, and D. Birchall
Evaluation of Cross-Sectional Luminal Morphology in Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease by Use of Spiral CT Angiography
Stroke, November 1, 2001; 32(11): 2511 - 2515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Randoux, B. Marro, F. Koskas, M. Duyme, M. Sahel, A. Zouaoui, and C. Marsault
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Prospective Comparison of CT, Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR, and Conventional Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Liu, K. D. Hopper, D. T. Mauger, and K. A. Addis
CT Angiographic Measurement of the Carotid Artery: Optimizing Visualization by Manipulating Window and Level Settings and Contrast Material Attenuation
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 494 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. B. Anderson, R. Ashforth, D. E. Steinke, R. Ferdinandy, and J. M. Findlay
CT Angiography for the Detection and Characterization of Carotid Artery Bifurcation Disease
Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31(9): 2168 - 2174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Rothwell, S. T. Pendlebury, J. Wardlaw, and C. P. Warlow
Critical Appraisal of the Design and Reporting of Studies of Imaging and Measurement of Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1444 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
O. Coskun, M. Hamon, G. Catroux, L. Gosme, P. Courthéoux, and J. Théron
Carotid-cavernous Fistulas: Diagnosis with Spiral CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2000; 21(4): 712 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Leclerc, J. Y. Gauvrit, and J. P. Pruvo
Usefulness of CT Angiography with Volume Rendering After Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 820 - 822.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
X. Leclerc, C. Lucas, O. Godefroy, L. Nicol, A. Moretti, D. Leys, and J. P. Pruvo
Preliminary Experience Using Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography to Assess Vertebral Artery Structure for the Follow-up of Suspected Dissection
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 1999; 20(8): 1482 - 1490.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
X. Leclerc, O. Godefroy, C. Lucas, J.-F. Benhaim, T. S. Michel, D. Leys, and J. P. Pruvo
Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: CT Angiography with Volume Rendering
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 673 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
X. Leclerc, O. Godefroy, A. Salhi, C. Lucas, D. Leys, and J.P. Pruvo
Helical CT for the Diagnosis of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Dissection
Stroke, March 1, 1996; 27(3): 461 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text]