(Stroke. 1995;26:1616-1619.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Outcomes of Elderly Stroke Patients
Day Hospital Versus Conventional Medical Management
From the Medical and Geriatric Unit, Shatin Hospital (E.H., C.M.L., K.H.O.), and the Department of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (J.W., R.L.C.K.), Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Correspondence to Dr Elsie Hui, MRCP, Shatin Hospital, 33 A Kung Kok Street, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Background and Purpose Much controversy exists over the value of geriatric day hospitals in the rehabilitation of elderly patients, and cerebrovascular accident is a particularly common diagnosis among patients referred to these day hospitals. We carried out a prospective, randomized study to compare the outcomes of elderly stroke patients managed by a geriatric team using a day hospital facility versus conventional medical management.
Methods One hundred twenty elderly patients with acute stroke were randomized to inpatient care on a stroke ward under the care of either a neurologist or a geriatric team. Those under the care of neurologists were hospitalized until the attending physician felt that the patients had reached full rehabilitation potential. Patients under the care of the geriatric team were discharged home as soon as the team felt they were able to cope and given follow-up rehabilitation at the day hospital. Family or community support was arranged when necessary for both treatment groups. On recruitment, patient demographics, medical history, clinical features related to stroke, and functional ability as measured by the Barthel Index were noted. Subjects were reviewed at 3 and 6 months to assess functional level, hospital and outpatient services received, general well-being, mood, and level of satisfaction. Costs of treatment of the two groups were also compared.
Results Functional improvement (Barthel Index score) was greater in the group managed by the geriatricians with a day hospital facility compared with the conventional group at 3 months (P=.03). There were also fewer outpatient visits among the day hospital patients at 6 months (P=.03). No significant difference was found in costs between the two treatment groups.
Conclusions Compared with conventional medical management, care in the geriatric day hospital hastened functional recovery and reduced outpatient visits in elderly stroke patients without additional cost.
Key Words: elderly • hospitalization • rehabilitation • stroke outcome
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Weinrich, D. C. Good, M. Reding, E. J. Roth, D. X. Cifu, K. H. Silver, R. L. Craik, J. Magaziner, M. Terrin, M. Schwartz, et al. Timing, Intensity, and Duration of Rehabilitation for Hip Fracture and Stroke: Report of a Workshop at the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2004; 18(1): 12 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Hershkovitz, D. Gottlieb, Y. Beloosesky, and S. Brill Programme evaluation of a geriatric rehabilitation day hospital Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2003; 17(7): 750 - 755. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Schwartzman, G. Duquette, M. Zaoude, M.-J. Dion, M.-A. Lagace, J. Poitras, and M. G. Cosio Respiratory day hospital: a novel approach to acute respiratory care Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 2001; 165(8): 1067 - 1071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Claesson, G. Gosman-Hedstrom, M. Johannesson, B. Fagerberg, and C. Blomstrand Resource Utilization and Costs of Stroke Unit Care Integrated in a Care Continuum: A 1-Year Controlled, Prospective, Randomized Study in Elderly Patients : The Goteborg 70+ Stroke Study Stroke, November 1, 2000; 31(11): 2569 - 2577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. A. A. Evers, A. J. H. A. Ament, and G. Blaauw Economic Evaluation in Stroke Research : A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2000; 31(5): 1046 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Forster, J. Young, and P. Langhorne Systematic review of day hospital care for elderly people BMJ, March 27, 1999; 318(7187): 837 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|