This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alberts, M. J. Articles by Rutledge, V. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alberts, M. J. Articles by Rutledge, V. R.

(Stroke. 1996;27:1825-1828.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Hospital Charges for Stroke Patients

Mark J. Alberts, MD; Cynthia A. Bennett, RRA, MBA Valinda R. Rutledge, RN, MBA

the Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine (M.J.A.), and the Clinical Decision Support Services (C.A.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI (V.R.R.).

Correspondence to Mark J. Alberts, MD, Duke University Medical Center, PO Box 3392, Durham, NC 27710.

Background and Purpose Stroke is a common disease with a yearly cost in the United States of approximately $30 billion. The increasing prevalence of managed care and cost-containment measures may affect the delivery of stroke care now and in the future. This study was performed to determine (1) hospital charges and test utilization for stroke patients and (2) the effectiveness of educational efforts in modifying test utilization and related hospital charges.

Methods Patients with a diagnosis of stroke who were discharged from either the neurology service or another service of the Department of Medicine (DOM) were identified. Data on test utilization and hospital charges were collected and analyzed. Following this analysis, educational sessions were held in an effort to reduce the use of specific diagnostic tests. The effectiveness of these methods was studied in a second group of stroke patients.

Results In the baseline period there were 303 stroke patients, of which 262 (86%) were discharged from the neurology service and 41 (14%) were discharged from other services of the DOM. Patients on the neurology service had a lower mean length of stay than patients on the other services of the DOM (9.2 days versus 10.5 days) and lower mean total charges per case ($13 149 versus $15 727), although the respective differences were not statistically significant. Patients on the neurology service were more likely to have both brain CT and MRI performed (82 of 262 patients, 31.3%) than patients on the other services of the DOM (4 of 41, 9.8%, P=.005). In addition, patients on the neurology service were more likely to undergo a transthoracic echocardiogram than patients on the other services of the DOM (71.8% versus 53.7%, P=.025). After educational sessions, the percentage of stroke patients on the neurology service having both CT and MRI fell from 31.3% to 17.7% (P=.005), and the number of stroke patients having a transthoracic echocardiogram fell from 71.8% to 60.3% (P=.025). However, the overall charges for stroke patients on the neurology service did not decrease.

Conclusions Education can be successful in reducing the utilization of and associated charges for specific diagnostic tests for some stroke patients. A multidisciplinary approach to case management, using tools such as care maps, may be necessary to realize significant cost savings in certain groups of stroke patients.

Key Words: costs and cost analysis • diagnostic tests • hospitalization • quality of health care • stroke management

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L.E. Cipriano, M.L. Steinberg, G.S. Gazelle, and R.G. Gonzalez Comparing and Predicting the Costs and Outcomes of Patients with Major and Minor Stroke Using the Boston Acute Stroke Imaging Scale Neuroimaging Classification System AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 703 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Luengo-Fernandez, A. M. Gray, and P. M. Rothwell Costs of Stroke Using Patient-Level Data: A Critical Review of the Literature Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): e18 - e23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Schleinitz and P. A. Heidenreich A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Combination Antiplatelet Therapy for High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes: Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone Ann Intern Med, February 15, 2005; 142(4): 251 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Yoneda, T. Uehara, H. Yamasaki, Y. Kita, M. Tabuchi, and E. Mori Hospital-Based Study of the Care and Cost of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Japan Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 718 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Reed, D. K. Blough, K. Meyer, and J. G. Jarvik Inpatient costs, length of stay, and mortality for cerebrovascular events in community hospitals Neurology, July 24, 2001; 57(2): 305 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Johnson, D. K. Kido, W. D. Shannon, M. M. Bahn, M. H. Gado, B. C. P. Lee, C. J. Moran, F. J. Wippold, and B. Littenberg Evaluation of a Reduced MR Imaging Sequencing Protocol in Adult Patients with Stroke Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 791 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. N. Diringer, D. F. Edwards, D. T. Mattson, P. T. Akins, C. W. Sheedy, C. Y. Hsu, and A. W. Dromerick Predictors of Acute Hospital Costs for Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in an Academic Center Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 724 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Newell Jr, J. Englert, A. Box-Taylor, K. M. Davis, and K. E. Koch Clinical Efficiency Tools Improve Stroke Management in a Rural Southern Health System Stroke, June 1, 1998; 29(6): 1092 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]