Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1996;27:1944-1950

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Derdeyn, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Derdeyn, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, W. J.

(Stroke. 1996;27:1944-1950.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease

Colin P. Derdeyn, MD William J. Powers, MD

the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics (C.P.D.), Madison, Wis, and the Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (C.P.D., W.J.P.) and Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery (Neurology) (W.J.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.

Correspondence to Colin P. Derdeyn, MD, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110. E-mail derdeyn@mirlink.wustl.edu.

Background and Purpose The value of screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis has become an important issue with the recently reported beneficial effect of endarterectomy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool to select subjects for arteriography and subsequent surgery.

Methods A computer model was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of screening a cohort of 1000 men during a 20-year period. The primary outcome measure was incremental present-value dollar expenditures for screening and treatment per incremental present-value quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. Estimates of disease prevalence and arteriographic and surgical complication rates were obtained from the literature. Probabilities of stroke and death with surgical and medical treatment were obtained from published clinical trials. Doppler ultrasound sensitivity and specificity were obtained through review of local experience. Estimates of costs were obtained from local Medicare reimbursement data.

Results A one-time screening program of a population with a high prevalence (20%) of >=60% stenosis cost $35 130 per incremental QALY gained. Decreased surgical benefit or increased annual discount rate was detrimental, resulting in lost QALYs. Annual screening cost $457 773 per incremental QALY gained. In a low-prevalence (4%) population, one-time screening cost $52 588 per QALY gained, while annual screening was detrimental.

Conclusions The cost-effectiveness of a one-time screening program for an asymptomatic population with a high prevalence of carotid stenosis may be cost-effective. Annual screening is detrimental. The most sensitive variables in this simulation model were long-term stroke risk reduction after surgery and annual discount rate for accumulated costs and QALYs.


Key Words: carotid endarterectomy • carotid stenosis • costs and cost analysis • diagnostic imaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
K. Dalziel and L. Segal
Time to give nutrition interventions a higher profile: cost-effectiveness of 10 nutrition interventions
Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2007; 22(4): 271 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. Karnon, A. Brennan, and R. Akehurst
A Critique and Impact Analysis of Decision Modeling Assumptions
Med Decis Making, August 1, 2007; 27(4): 491 - 499.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. P. Derdeyn
Carotid Stenting for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Trial It
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 715 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. Dalziel, L. Segal, and M. de Lorgeril
A Mediterranean Diet Is Cost-Effective in Patients with Previous Myocardial Infarction
J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 1879 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
P. S. Mullenix, M. J. Martin, S. R. Steele, G. S. Lavenson Jr, B. W. Starnes, N. C. Hadro, R. P. Peterson, and C. A. Andersen
Rapid High-Volume Population Screening for Three Major Risk Factors of Future Stroke: Phase I Results
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, May 1, 2006; 40(3): 177 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. G. Grant, C. B. Benson, G. L. Moneta, A. V. Alexandrov, J. D. Baker, E. I. Bluth, B. A. Carroll, M. Eliasziw, J. Gocke, B. S. Hertzberg, et al.
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 340 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. B. Mark, L. J. Shaw, M. S. Lauer, P. G. O'Malley, and P. Heidenreich
Task force #5--is atherosclerosis imaging cost effective?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 1906 - 1917.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. M. Benade and C. P. Warlow
Costs and Benefits of Carotid Endarterectomy and Associated Preoperative Arterial Imaging: A Systematic Review of Health Economic Literature
Stroke, February 1, 2002; 33(2): 629 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. O. Tengs, M. Yu, E. Luistro, and H. B. Bosworth
Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke A Comprehensive Review Editorial Comment : Health-Related Quality Of Life After Stroke: A Comprehensive Review
Stroke, April 1, 2001; 32(4): 964 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
O. Joakimsen, K. H. Bonaa, E. B. Mathiesen, E. Stensland-Bugge, and E. Arnesen
Prediction of Mortality by Ultrasound Screening of a General Population for Carotid Stenosis : The Tromso Study
Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 1871 - 1876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. G. Grant, A. J. Duerinckx, S. M. El Saden, M. L. Melany, G. M. Hathout, P. T. Zimmerman, A. K. Marumoto, S. N. Cohen, and J. D. Baker
Ability to Use Duplex US to Quantify Internal Carotid Arterial Stenoses: Fact or Fiction?1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 247 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. G. Holloway, C. G. Benesch, C. R. Rahilly, and C. E. Courtright
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Research of Stroke Evaluation and Treatment
Stroke, July 1, 1999; 30(7): 1340 - 1349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. T. Longstreth Jr, L. Shemanski, D. Lefkowitz, D. H. O'Leary, J. F. Polak, and S. K. Wolfson Jr
Asymptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Defined by Ultrasound and the Risk of Subsequent Stroke in the Elderly : The Cardiovascular Health Study
Stroke, November 1, 1998; 29(11): 2371 - 2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
N. A. Obuchowski, M. T. Modic, M. Magdinec, and T. J. Masaryk
Assessment of the Efficacy of Noninvasive Screening for Patients With Asymptomatic Neck Bruits
Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1330 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text]