(Stroke. 1996;27:2191-2196.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the University Department of Neurology, Universita degli Studi di Catania, Italy (G.R., G.P.) and the University Department of Neurology, Hopital de la Citadelle, Liege, Belgium (E.B., A.M. de N., P.J.D.).
Correspondence to Professor P.J. Delwaide, University Department of Neurology, Boulevard du XII de Ligne, B-4000 Liege, Belgium.
Background and Purpose We used transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex to evaluate the functional state of corticospinal pathways innervating the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the hand in 26 patients suffering from a first-ever ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory.
Methods All patients had complete hand palsy and were tested within the first 24 hours from stroke onset. Patients were also tested clinically with the MRC, Rankin, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) stroke scales at day 1 and with MRC and NIH scales and the Barthel Index at day 14. Electrophysiological testing was repeated at day 14. Patients were divided into three subgroups according to the amplitude of the maximal response (motor evoked potential [MEP]) evoked at day 1.
Results After 2 weeks, all 6 patients with initial MEPs >5% maximum motor response (Mmax) showed some first dorsal interosseous muscle motor function recovery, whereas 19 of 20 patients with initially absent or small (<5% Mmax) MEPs were left with complete hand palsy. There were strong positive correlations between MEP amplitude at day 1 and MRC and Barthel Index scores at day 14. However, measurement of central motor conduction time proved to be of little prognostic value.
Conclusions We conclude that early-performed transcranial magnetic stimulation is a valuable prognostic tool for motor recovery from stroke and that relatively preserved MEP amplitude shortly after stroke is a better prognostic factor than normal central motor conduction time.
Key Words: cerebral ischemia cortical stimulation magnetics prognosis outcome
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. F. Wittenberg, E. P. Bastings, A. M. Fowlkes, T. M. Morgan, D. C. Good, and T. P. Pons Dynamic Course of Intracortical TMS Paired-Pulse Responses During Recovery of Motor Function After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 568 - 573. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J Butler and S. L Wolf Putting the Brain on the Map: Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Assess and Induce Cortical Plasticity of Upper-Extremity Movement Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 719 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Desmurget, F. Bonnetblanc, and H. Duffau Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity Brain, April 1, 2007; 130(4): 898 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, P. R. Smale, J. P. Coxon, M. K. Fleming, and W. D. Byblow Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity Brain, January 1, 2007; 130(1): 170 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Calautti and J.-C. Baron Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults: A Review Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1553 - 1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Sala, M J Krzan, G Jallo, F J Epstein, and V Deletis Prognostic value of motor evoked potentials elicited by multipulse magnetic stimulation in a surgically induced transitory lesion of the supplementary motor area: a case report J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2000; 69(6): 828 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Feys, J. Van Hees, F. Bruyninckx, R. Mercelis, and W. De Weerdt Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2000; 68(3): 323 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pennisi, G. Rapisarda, R. Bella, V. Calabrese, A. Maertens de Noordhout, and P. J. Delwaide Absence of Response to Early Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke Patients : Prognostic Value for Hand Motor Recovery Stroke, December 1, 1999; 30(12): 2666 - 2670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vang, D. Dunbabin, and D. Kilpatrick Effects of Spontaneous Recanalization on Functional and Electrophysiological Recovery in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30(10): 2119 - 2125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vang, D. Dunbabin, and D. Kilpatrick Correlation Between Functional and Electrophysiological Recovery in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30(10): 2126 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hallett {blacksquare} REVIEW : Plasticity in the Human Motor System Neuroscientist, September 1, 1999; 5(5): 324 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Escudero, J. Sancho, D. Bautista, M. Escudero, and J. Lopez-Trigo Prognostic Value of Motor Evoked Potential Obtained by Transcranial Magnetic Brain Stimulation in Motor Function Recovery in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1854 - 1859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |