This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alexandrov, A. V. Articles by Norris, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alexandrov, A. V. Articles by Norris, J. W. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Brain Diseases

(Stroke. 1996;27:232-237.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Agreement on Disease-Specific Criteria for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Acute Stroke

Andrei V. Alexandrov, MD; Patrick M. Pullicino, MD; Eric M. Meslin, PhD; John W. Norris, MD for the members of the Canadian Western New York Stroke Consortiums

From the Stroke Program, Department of Neurology, Buffalo General Hospital, State University of New York at Buffalo (A.V.A., P.M.P.); and the Stroke Research Unit (A.V.A., J.W.N.) and the Clinical Ethics Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre and Centre for Bioethics (E.M.M.), University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr A.V. Alexandrov, Stroke Research Unit, 20754 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.

Background and Purpose The do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order is a mechanism of withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The lack of DNR guidelines specific for acute stroke may result in many stroke patients receiving unnecessary and futile resuscitation and ventilator-assisted breathing.

Methods A prospective multicenter evaluation of disease-specific criteria for DNR orders in acute stroke was initiated using a modified Delphi process. The participants were the Canadian and Western New York Stroke Consortium members who are closely involved in caring for acute stroke patients and conducting clinical trials at the academic centers. Previously published provisional criteria were reviewed by the participants. Modifications were made to the criteria until statistically significant agreement (P<.05, z score, or 67% similar answers) was achieved.

Results Disease-specific criteria for DNR orders in acute stroke were discussed by 26 physicians in three rounds of the opinion survey. An agreement was reached that a "no resuscitation" decision is appropriate when any two of the following three clinical criteria are present (the degree of agreement is given in parentheses): severe stroke (88%, P=.00007), life-threatening brain damage (73%, P<.01), and significant comorbidities (92%, P=.00003). The poor prognosis implied by these criteria should be discussed whenever possible among physician(s), the patient, and family members before the decision to withhold CPR is made. Eighty-one percent of the participants agreed that these disease-specific criteria are appropriate for clinical use (P=.0008).

Conclusions Disease-specific criteria for DNR orders were developed to supplement general DNR policies for patients with hemispheric brain infarction and intracerebral hemorrhage during the first 2 weeks of stroke. A significant agreement was reached by a panel of physicians that patients with acute stroke should not be resuscitated if these disease-specific criteria are met.

Key Words: hospitalization • outcome • resuscitation orders

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Broderick, S. Connolly, E. Feldmann, D. Hanley, C. Kase, D. Krieger, M. Mayberg, L. Morgenstern, C. S. Ogilvy, P. Vespa, et al. REPRINT: Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Adults: 2007 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): e391 - e413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Dirks, L. W Niessen, P. J Koudstaal, C. L Franke, R. J van Oostenbrugge, D. W J Dippel, and the members of the Delphi panel on indications and Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: from trial exclusion criteria to clinical contraindications. An international Delphi study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 78(7): 685 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Broderick, S. Connolly, E. Feldmann, D. Hanley, C. Kase, D. Krieger, M. Mayberg, L. Morgenstern, C. S. Ogilvy, P. Vespa, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Adults: 2007 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 2001 - 2023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-M. Hilden, P. Louhiala, M.-L. Honkasalo, and J. Palo Finnish Nurses' Views on End-of-Life Discussions and a Comparison with Physicians' Views Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2004; 11(2): 165 - 178. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. K. Rayens and E. J. Hahn Building Consensus Using the Policy Delphi Method Policy Politics Nursing Practice, November 1, 2000; 1(4): 308 - 315. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bestue, J.-R. Ara, J. Martin, C. Iturriaga, A. Tejada, and M. Diringer Mechanical ventilation for ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage Neurology, June 1, 1999; 52(9): 1920 - 1920. [Full Text]