This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gymnopoulos, C. Articles by Ramadan, N. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gymnopoulos, C. Articles by Ramadan, N. M.

(Stroke. 1996;27:300-302.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Low Pulsatility Signals Through the Orbits

Constantinos Gymnopoulos, MD Nabih M. Ramadan, MD

From the Cerebrovascular Laboratory, Center for Stroke Research, Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital and Health Sciences Center, Detroit, Mich.

Correspondence to Nabih M. Ramadan, MD, Henry Ford Hospital and Health Sciences Center, Department of Neurology, K-11, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202. E-mail ramadan@neuro.hfh.edu.

Background and Purpose Low pulsatility signals (LPS) on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography are detected (1) with arteriovenous malformations, (2) distal to hemodynamically significant stenosis, and (3) in venous structures. We describe focal LPS in the territory of the internal carotid artery siphon that do not represent any of the above conditions.

Methods We performed retrospective and prospective reviews of transcranial Doppler studies on 3225 patients over 5 years. Clinical and radiological data of all patients with focal LPS were extracted. LPS was defined as a focal signal identified through the orbital windows with a low pulsatility index (<0.6).

Results Sixteen LPS (mean flow velocity [mean±SD], 62±11 cm/s; pulsatility index [mean±SD], 0.41±0.08; depth range, 46 to 72 mm) from 15 patients (mean±SD age, 45±15 years; 4 men, 11 women) were identified. LPS flow direction was away from the probe in 13 cases and toward it in 3. Presenting symptoms included headache, focal neurological deficits, dizziness, and pulsatile tinnitus. All patients had cranial MRI (MRI and MR angiography in 11). Three patients underwent conventional cerebral angiography. Arteriovenous malformations or significant arterial stenoses were not detected on any study.

Conclusions A focal signal from the internal carotid artery siphon region with low pulsatility index and normal mean flow velocity, identified in the absence of other transcranial Doppler abnormalities, is not related to an arteriovenous malformation or proximal arterial stenosis. LPS, as defined, are not of venous origin since mean flow velocity was in the arterial range. LPS are likely related to prominent venous flow in the cavernous sinus secondary to unusually strong pulsation of the intracavernous internal carotid artery.

Key Words: cerebrovascular disorders • transcranial Doppler • ultrasonics • vascular malformations