This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wong, K.S. Articles by Kay, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wong, K.S. Articles by Kay, R.

(Stroke. 1996;27:1084-1087.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Variability of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Computed Tomography Angiography in Grading Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis

K.S. Wong, MRCP; Wynnie W.M. Lam, FRCR; Eisen Liang, FRCR; Y.N. Huang, MD; Y.L. Chan, FRCR Richard Kay, FRCP

From the Department of Medicine (K.S.W., R.K.) and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging (W.W.M.L., E.L., Y.L.C.), Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, and the Department of Neurology (Y.N.H.), Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

Correspondence to Dr K.S. Wong, Department of Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong. E-mail ks-wong@cuhk.edu.hk.

Background and Purpose Magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography are new, noninvasive methods to provide images of the cerebral vasculature. The reliability of magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography when used to grade middle cerebral artery stenosis remains to be established. We sought to study the interobserver and intraobserver variabilities of magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography in grading middle cerebral artery stenosis.

Methods A total of 50 middle cerebral arteries in 25 patients were studied with magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography. All patients had a history of ischemic stroke. The films were read independently by two observers on separate occasions. Films were shown again to the same observer 4 weeks after the first reading. The degree of middle cerebral artery stenosis was categorized into four grades: normal/mild, moderate, severe, and occluded. The interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were calculated by the statistic method.

Results Interobserver variability for grading middle cerebral artery stenosis was good (=0.78) for magnetic resonance angiography and moderate (=0.51) for computed tomography angiography. There was perfect agreement between two observers in 86% of the vessels shown in magnetic resonance angiography and in 76% of the vessels shown in computed tomography angiography. Intraobserver variability for both imaging methods was good, with the value in the range of 0.70 to 0.76.

Conclusions Our results suggest that according to our protocol, magnetic resonance angiography is more reliable than computed tomography angiography in grading middle cerebral artery stenosis.

Key Words: middle cerebral artery • angiography • stenosis • angiography, magnetic resonance • stroke, ischemic

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. C. Suwanwela, K. Phanthumchinda, and N. Suwanwela Transcranial Doppler Sonography and CT Angiography in Patients with Atherothrombotic Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2002; 23(8): 1352 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hernandez-Hoyos, M. Orkisz, P. Puech, C. Mansard-Desbleds, P. Douek, and I. E. Magnin Computer-assisted Analysis of Three-dimensional MR Angiograms RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 421 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Y. Bang, J. H. Heo, J. Y. Kim, J. H. Park, and K. Huh Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Is a Major Clinical Determinant in Striatocapsular Small, Deep Infarction Arch Neurol, February 1, 2002; 59(2): 259 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]