Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1997;28:1883-1887

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorman, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sandercock, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dorman, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sandercock, P.

(Stroke. 1997;28:1883-1887.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Are Proxy Assessments of Health Status After Stroke With the EuroQol Questionnaire Feasible, Accurate, and Unbiased?

Paul J. Dorman, MRCP; Fiona Waddell, RGN; Jim Slattery, MSc; Martin Dennis, FRCP; Peter Sandercock, FRCP

From the Neurosciences Trials Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Correspondence to Dr Paul Dorman, Neurosciences Trials Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Rd, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK. E-mail pd{at}skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk

Background and Purpose It is often difficult to determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of stroke patients because physical and cognitive problems limit their ability to complete complex questionnaires. A proxy, such as a family member or caregiver, may be able to give an estimate of the patients' health status. We therefore examined the agreement between the HRQoL as assessed by a series of patients and that assessed by their proxies.

Methods We studied the validity of the EuroQol in a series of 152 patients from our prospective registry of patients with first (or recurrent) stroke. We asked patients to ensure that a friend or relative (a proxy) who knew them well was available at the time of the interview. We asked each proxy to complete a EuroQol questionnaire independently on behalf of the patient.

Results Proxies completed forms for 130 patients (86%). Agreement between responses from the patients and those from their proxies was better for patients who were able to self-complete the EuroQol than for patients who required the EuroQol to be administered by interview. For both groups, agreement was best for the self-care domain and worst for the domain that assessed psychological outcome. For the more severely affected patients, agreement was only fair for the pain and social functioning domains and no better than chance alone for the psychological functioning domain ({kappa}=0.05, 95% confidence interval, 0 to 0.43). Patients tended to rate their own health status as better than their proxies did (P<.05).

Conclusions We found moderate agreement between responses from patients and those from their proxies for the more directly observable domains of the EuroQol. Proxy agreement was less good for the more subjective domains. In health surveys, allowing responses by a proxy increases response rate. However, the disadvantages inherent in the use of proxy responses must be considered carefully. In general, some domains of HRQoL information obtained from a proxy may be sufficiently valid and unbiased to be useable in most types of trials and surveys.


Key Words: observer variation • stroke outcome • quality of life




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. J. Carod-Artal, L. F. Coral, D. S. Trizotto, and C. M. Moreira
Self- and Proxy-Report Agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale
Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): 3308 - 3314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
I. Muus, M. Petzold, and K. C. Ringsberg
Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke: Reliability of Proxy Responses
Clin Nurs Res, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 103 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
K. Hilari, S. Owen, and S. J. Farrelly
Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 78(10): 1072 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M.-H. Chen, C.-L. Hsieh, H.-F. Mao, and S.-L. Huang
Differences between patient and proxy reports in the assessment of disability after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2007; 21(4): 351 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
I. Lindgren, A.-C. Jonsson, B. Norrving, and A. Lindgren
Shoulder Pain After Stroke: A Prospective Population-Based Study
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 343 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
S. Resnizky and N. Bentur
Can Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients Be a Reliable Source of Information About the Severity of Patient Symptoms?
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2007; 23(6): 447 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. Y. Chong, H. S. Lee, B. Boden-Albala, M. C. Paik, and R. L. Sacco
Gender differences in self-report of recovery after stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study.
Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1282 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social ScienceHome page
R. L. Kane, R. A. Kane, B. Bershadsky, H. Degenholtz, K. Kling, A. Totten, and K. Jung
Proxy Sources for Information on Nursing Home Residents' Quality of Life
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., November 1, 2005; 60(6): S318 - S325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A.-C. Jonsson, I. Lindgren, B. Hallstrom, B. Norrving, and A. Lindgren
Determinants of Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers
Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 803 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. W. Sturm, G. A. Donnan, H. M. Dewey, R. A. L. Macdonell, A. K. Gilligan, V. Srikanth, and A. G. Thrift
Quality of Life After Stroke: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS)
Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2340 - 2345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. G. Breugelmans, D. E. Ford, P. L. Smith, and N. M. Punjabi
Differences in Patient and Bed Partner-assessed Quality of Life in Sleep-disordered Breathing
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2004; 170(5): 547 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. S. Pickard, J. A. Johnson, D. H. Feeny, A. Shuaib, K.C. Carriere, and A. M. Nasser
Agreement Between Patient and Proxy Assessments of Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke Using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index
Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 607 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
T Hillen, S Davies, A G Rudd, T Kieselbach, and C D Wolfe
Self ratings of health predict functional outcome and recurrence free survival after stroke
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2003; 57(12): 960 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
I. Gasquet, S. Dehe, P. Gaudebout, and B. Falissard
Regular Visitors Are Not Good Substitutes for Assessment of Elderly Patient Satisfaction With Nursing Home Care and Services
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2003; 58(11): M1036 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
I-P. Hsueh, C.-H. Wang, C.-F. Sheu, and C.-L. Hsieh
Comparison of Psychometric Properties of Three Mobility Measures for Patients With Stroke
Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1741 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. R Tooth, K. T McKenna, and M. Smith
Further evidence for the agreement between patients with stroke and their proxies on the Frenchay Activities Index
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 656 - 665.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. W. Duncan, S. M. Lai, D. Tyler, S. Perera, D. M. Reker, and S. Studenski
Evaluation of Proxy Responses to the Stroke Impact Scale
Stroke, November 1, 2002; 33(11): 2593 - 2599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
P. W Duncan, D. M Reker, R. D Horner, G. P Samsa, H. Hoenig, B. J LaClair, and T. K Dudley
Performance of a mail-administered version of a stroke-speci" c outcome measure, the Stroke Impact Scale
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2002; 16(5): 493 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. I. Cameron and M. D. Buck
Facilitating Data Collection in Stroke Patients and the Elderly Response
Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31 (12): 3079 - 3083.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P. Dorman, M. Dennis, and P. Sandercock
Are the modified "simple questions" a valid and reliable measure of health related quality of life after stroke?
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2000; 69(4): 487 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Sulch, I. Perez, A. Melbourn, and L. Kalra
Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrated (Managed) Care Pathway for Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 1929 - 1934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Buck, A. Jacoby, A. Massey, and G. Ford
Evaluation of Measures Used to Assess Quality of Life After Stroke
Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 2004 - 2010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. W. Duncan, H. S. Jorgensen, and D. T. Wade
Outcome Measures in Acute Stroke Trials : A Systematic Review and Some Recommendations to Improve Practice
Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1429 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. Postulart and E. M.M. Adang
Response Shift and Adaptation in Chronically III Patients
Med Decis Making, April 1, 2000; 20(2): 186 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. L. Hackett, J. R. Duncan, C. S. Anderson, J. B. Broad, and R. Bonita
Health-Related Quality of Life Among Long-Term Survivors of Stroke : Results From the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992
Stroke, February 1, 2000; 31(2): 440 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. J. Dorman, M. Dennis, and P. Sandercock
How Do Scores on the EuroQol Relate to Scores on the SF-36 After Stroke?
Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30(10): 2146 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
H. A. Glick, D. Polsky, R. J. Willke, and K. A. Schulman
A Comparison of Preference Assessment Instruments Used in a Clinical Trial: Responses to the Visual Analog Scale from the EuroQol EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 265 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. S. Pickard, J. A. Johnson, A. Penn, F. Lau, and T. Noseworthy
Replicability of SF-36 Summary Scores by the SF-12 in Stroke Patients
Stroke, June 1, 1999; 30(6): 1213 - 1217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Dorman, J. Slattery, B. Farrell, M. Dennis, and P. Sandercock
Qualitative Comparison of the Reliability of Health Status Assessments With the EuroQol and SF-36 Questionnaires After Stroke
Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 63 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]