(Stroke. 1997;28:1883-1887.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Neurosciences Trials Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Paul Dorman, Neurosciences Trials Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Rd, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK. E-mail pd{at}skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk
Background and Purpose It is often difficult to determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of stroke patients because physical and cognitive problems limit their ability to complete complex questionnaires. A proxy, such as a family member or caregiver, may be able to give an estimate of the patients' health status. We therefore examined the agreement between the HRQoL as assessed by a series of patients and that assessed by their proxies.
Methods We studied the validity of the EuroQol in a series of 152 patients from our prospective registry of patients with first (or recurrent) stroke. We asked patients to ensure that a friend or relative (a proxy) who knew them well was available at the time of the interview. We asked each proxy to complete a EuroQol questionnaire independently on behalf of the patient.
Results Proxies completed forms for 130 patients (86%).
Agreement between responses from the patients and those from their
proxies was better for patients who were able to self-complete the
EuroQol than for patients who required the EuroQol to be administered
by interview. For both groups, agreement was best for the self-care
domain and worst for the domain that assessed psychological outcome.
For the more severely affected patients, agreement was only fair for
the pain and social functioning domains and no better than chance alone
for the psychological functioning domain (
=0.05, 95% confidence
interval, 0 to 0.43). Patients tended to rate their own health status
as better than their proxies did (P<.05).
Conclusions We found moderate agreement between responses from patients and those from their proxies for the more directly observable domains of the EuroQol. Proxy agreement was less good for the more subjective domains. In health surveys, allowing responses by a proxy increases response rate. However, the disadvantages inherent in the use of proxy responses must be considered carefully. In general, some domains of HRQoL information obtained from a proxy may be sufficiently valid and unbiased to be useable in most types of trials and surveys.
Key Words: observer variation stroke outcome quality of life
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. J. Carod-Artal, L. F. Coral, D. S. Trizotto, and C. M. Moreira Self- and Proxy-Report Agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): 3308 - 3314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Muus, M. Petzold, and K. C. Ringsberg Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke: Reliability of Proxy Responses Clin Nurs Res, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 103 - 118. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hilari, S. Owen, and S. J. Farrelly Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 78(10): 1072 - 1075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-H. Chen, C.-L. Hsieh, H.-F. Mao, and S.-L. Huang Differences between patient and proxy reports in the assessment of disability after stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2007; 21(4): 351 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lindgren, A.-C. Jonsson, B. Norrving, and A. Lindgren Shoulder Pain After Stroke: A Prospective Population-Based Study Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 343 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Resnizky and N. Bentur Can Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients Be a Reliable Source of Information About the Severity of Patient Symptoms? American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2007; 23(6): 447 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Chong, H. S. Lee, B. Boden-Albala, M. C. Paik, and R. L. Sacco Gender differences in self-report of recovery after stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study. Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1282 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Kane, R. A. Kane, B. Bershadsky, H. Degenholtz, K. Kling, A. Totten, and K. Jung Proxy Sources for Information on Nursing Home Residents' Quality of Life J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., November 1, 2005; 60(6): S318 - S325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-C. Jonsson, I. Lindgren, B. Hallstrom, B. Norrving, and A. Lindgren Determinants of Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Sturm, G. A. Donnan, H. M. Dewey, R. A. L. Macdonell, A. K. Gilligan, V. Srikanth, and A. G. Thrift Quality of Life After Stroke: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS) Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2340 - 2345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Breugelmans, D. E. Ford, P. L. Smith, and N. M. Punjabi Differences in Patient and Bed Partner-assessed Quality of Life in Sleep-disordered Breathing Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2004; 170(5): 547 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Pickard, J. A. Johnson, D. H. Feeny, A. Shuaib, K.C. Carriere, and A. M. Nasser Agreement Between Patient and Proxy Assessments of Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke Using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 607 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Hillen, S Davies, A G Rudd, T Kieselbach, and C D Wolfe Self ratings of health predict functional outcome and recurrence free survival after stroke J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2003; 57(12): 960 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gasquet, S. Dehe, P. Gaudebout, and B. Falissard Regular Visitors Are Not Good Substitutes for Assessment of Elderly Patient Satisfaction With Nursing Home Care and Services J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2003; 58(11): M1036 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I-P. Hsueh, C.-H. Wang, C.-F. Sheu, and C.-L. Hsieh Comparison of Psychometric Properties of Three Mobility Measures for Patients With Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1741 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R Tooth, K. T McKenna, and M. Smith Further evidence for the agreement between patients with stroke and their proxies on the Frenchay Activities Index Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 656 - 665. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Duncan, S. M. Lai, D. Tyler, S. Perera, D. M. Reker, and S. Studenski Evaluation of Proxy Responses to the Stroke Impact Scale Stroke, November 1, 2002; 33(11): 2593 - 2599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W Duncan, D. M Reker, R. D Horner, G. P Samsa, H. Hoenig, B. J LaClair, and T. K Dudley Performance of a mail-administered version of a stroke-speci" c outcome measure, the Stroke Impact Scale Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2002; 16(5): 493 - 505. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Cameron and M. D. Buck Facilitating Data Collection in Stroke Patients and the Elderly Response Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31 (12): 3079 - 3083. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dorman, M. Dennis, and P. Sandercock Are the modified "simple questions" a valid and reliable measure of health related quality of life after stroke? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2000; 69(4): 487 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sulch, I. Perez, A. Melbourn, and L. Kalra Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrated (Managed) Care Pathway for Stroke Rehabilitation Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 1929 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Buck, A. Jacoby, A. Massey, and G. Ford Evaluation of Measures Used to Assess Quality of Life After Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 2004 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Duncan, H. S. Jorgensen, and D. T. Wade Outcome Measures in Acute Stroke Trials : A Systematic Review and Some Recommendations to Improve Practice Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1429 - 1438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Postulart and E. M.M. Adang Response Shift and Adaptation in Chronically III Patients Med Decis Making, April 1, 2000; 20(2): 186 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Hackett, J. R. Duncan, C. S. Anderson, J. B. Broad, and R. Bonita Health-Related Quality of Life Among Long-Term Survivors of Stroke : Results From the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992 Stroke, February 1, 2000; 31(2): 440 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Dorman, M. Dennis, and P. Sandercock How Do Scores on the EuroQol Relate to Scores on the SF-36 After Stroke? Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30(10): 2146 - 2151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Glick, D. Polsky, R. J. Willke, and K. A. Schulman A Comparison of Preference Assessment Instruments Used in a Clinical Trial: Responses to the Visual Analog Scale from the EuroQol EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index Med Decis Making, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 265 - 275. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Pickard, J. A. Johnson, A. Penn, F. Lau, and T. Noseworthy Replicability of SF-36 Summary Scores by the SF-12 in Stroke Patients Stroke, June 1, 1999; 30(6): 1213 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dorman, J. Slattery, B. Farrell, M. Dennis, and P. Sandercock Qualitative Comparison of the Reliability of Health Status Assessments With the EuroQol and SF-36 Questionnaires After Stroke Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 63 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |