This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Can, U. Articles by Kistler, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Can, U. Articles by Kistler, J. P.

(Stroke. 1997;28:1966-1971.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Criteria for Hemodynamically Significant Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Based on Residual Lumen Diameter Calculated From En Bloc Endarterectomy Specimens

Ufuk Can, MD; Karen L. Furie, MD; Nijasri Suwanwela, MD; James F. Southern, MD, PhD; Nancy R. Macdonald, RN; Christopher S. Ogilvy, MD; Ferdinando S. Buonanno, MD; Walter J. Koroshetz, MD; J. Philip Kistler, MD

From the Stroke Service, Neurology Service (U.C., K.L.F., N.S., F.S.B., W.J.K., J.P.K.); the Department of Pathology (J.F.S.); the Vascular Laboratory (N.R.M.); and the Neurosurgery Service (C.S.O.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to J. Philip Kistler, MD, Director, Stroke Service/Cerebrovascular Section, Vascular Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail Furie{at}helix.mgh.harvard.edu

Background and Purpose Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is often used in conjunction with carotid duplex ultrasonography (CDUS) to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. We examined the sensitivity and specificity of TCD criteria for detection of a hemodynamically significant stenosis (residual lumen diameter <1.5 mm) at the origin of the ICA.

Methods We selected patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and had preoperative TCD data available. Eighty-one patients underwent transorbital evaluation, 49 of whom also had transtemporal TCD performed. The endarterectomy specimens were removed en bloc and sectioned, and the minimal residual lumen diameter calculated by computer analysis.

Results For the transorbital approach, the strongest indicators of a residual lumen diameter <1.5 mm were reversed flow in the ipsilateral ophthalmic artery and a >50% peak systolic velocity difference between the carotid siphons (distal ICAs) in patients with unilateral ICA origin stenosis. They were 100% specific and 31% and 26% sensitive, respectively. For the transtemporal approach in patients with a unilateral stenosis, a >35% difference in ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) peak systolic velocity relative to the contralateral MCA or a >50% difference in contralateral anterior cerebral artery (ACA) peak systolic velocity relative to the ipsilateral ACA were 100% specific for identifying a residual lumen diameter of <1.5 mm. Sensitivities were 32% and 43%, respectively. Irrespective of contralateral stenosis, a >35% difference in ipsilateral MCA peak systolic velocity relative to the ipsilateral posterior cerebral artery had a 100% specificity and a 23% sensitivity for detecting a <1.5 mm minimal residual lumen diameter.

Conclusions Although the TCD sensitivity for detecting a hemodynamically significant stenosis is relatively low, it can be highly specific (up to 100%). We conclude that TCD enhances the specificity of highly sensitive CDUS criteria for detecting a hemodynamically significant ICA stenosis.

Key Words: transcranial Doppler • carotid arteries • pathology • diagnostic imaging

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. N. Popa, M. P. Spencer, C. L. Lion, and R. A. Felberg Power M-Mode Doppler and Single-Gate Spectral Analysis Using a 2-MHz Pulsed-Wave Doppler Transducer to Directly Detect Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Use of the Continuity Principle: Report of a Novel Technique Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1780 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Kistler Carotid Artery Stenosis Circulation, May 2, 2006; 113(17): e740 - e741. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kamouchi, K. Kishikawa, Y. Okada, T. Inoue, S. Ibayashi, and M. Iida Reappraisal of Flow Velocity Ratio in Common Carotid Artery to Predict Hemodynamic Change in Carotid Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2005; 26(4): 957 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kamouchi, K. Kishikawa, Y. Okada, T. Inoue, S. Ibayashi, and M. Iida Poststenotic Flow and Intracranial Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Stenosis: Transoral Carotid Ultrasonography Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 76 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Sloan, A. V. Alexandrov, C. H. Tegeler, M. P. Spencer, L. R. Caplan, E. Feldmann, L. R. Wechsler, D. W. Newell, C. R. Gomez, V. L. Babikian, et al. Assessment: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology, May 11, 2004; 62(9): 1468 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Romero, M. H. Lev, S.-T. Chan, M. M. Connelly, R. C. Curiel, A. E. Jackson, R. G. Gonzalez, and R. H. Ackerman US of Neurovascular Occlusive Disease: Interpretive Pearls and Pitfalls RadioGraphics, September 1, 2002; 22(5): 1165 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Kistler and K. L. Furie Carotid Endarterectomy Revisited N. Engl. J. Med., June 8, 2000; 342(23): 1743 - 1745. [Full Text]