(Stroke. 1997;28:1993-1997.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Departments of Neurology and Radiology (L.L.H.), University of Texas at Houston.
Correspondence to Lewis B. Morgenstern, MD, Stroke Treatment Team, Department of Neurology, University of Texas at Houston, 6431 Fannin, Suite 7.044, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail lmorgens{at}neuro.med.uth.tmc.edu
Background and Purpose Dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries is most accurately diagnosed with conventional angiography. MR techniques are sensitive for detecting the abnormalities associated with dissection but may lack specificity. We hypothesized that MR may be useful for serial monitoring of dissection and may therefore guide therapy.
Methods All patients with angiographically proven carotid and/or vertebral artery dissection from July 1994 to June 1996 were followed for a median duration of 10.5 months. Of these 29 patients (44 vessels), 18 were concurrently evaluated with MR, and a target group of 9 patients (17 vessels) was prospectively followed with MR at 3-month intervals.
Results In the 18 patients with both imaging studies at baseline, angiography revealed 30 dissected vessels while MR detected 27 (90%). In the target group of 9 patients, initial MR identified 15 of the 17 dissections diagnosed with angiography. Serial MR revealed complete healing in 5 vessels, improvement in 6 vessels, no change in 4 vessels, and worsening in 2 vessels. The radiographic features most likely to resolve were stenosis and mural hematoma, while occlusion and luminal irregularity tended to persist. Late ischemic events occurred in 2 patients, both with persistent MR evidence of dissection, one while subtherapeutic on warfarin therapy and the other occurring 1 week after warfarin was discontinued.
Conclusions MR is a reliable noninvasive method for following the vascular response to treatment and may guide the course of a clinical trial comparing medical therapies for carotid and vertebral artery dissection.
Key Words: angiography angiography, magnetic resonance dissection stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Arnold, R. W. Baumgartner, C. Stapf, K. Nedeltchev, F. Buffon, D. Benninger, D. Georgiadis, M. Sturzenegger, H. P. Mattle, and M.-G. Bousser Ultrasound Diagnosis of Spontaneous Carotid Dissection With Isolated Horner Syndrome Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 82 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dittrich, I. Nassenstein, R. Bachmann, D. Maintz, D. G. Nabavi, W. Heindel, G. Kuhlenbaumer, and E. B. Ringelstein Polyarterial clustered recurrence of cervical artery dissection seems to be the rule Neurology, July 10, 2007; 69(2): 180 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Arnold, M. G. Bousser, G. Fahrni, U. Fischer, D. Georgiadis, J. Gandjour, D. Benninger, M. Sturzenegger, H. P. Mattle, and R. W. Baumgartner Vertebral Artery Dissection: Presenting Findings and Predictors of Outcome Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2499 - 2503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Arnold, R Cumurciuc, C Stapf, P Favrole, K Berthet, and M-G Bousser Pain as the only symptom of cervical artery dissection J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2006; 77(9): 1021 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tola, M. Yurdakul, and T. Cumhur B-Flow Imaging in Low Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Dissection J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2005; 24(11): 1497 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Cohen, R. R. Leker, M. Gotkine, M. Gomori, and T. Ben-Hur Emergent Stenting to Treat Patients With Carotid Artery Dissection: Clinically and Radiologically Directed Therapeutic Decision Making Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34 (12): e254 - e257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Beletsky, Z. Nadareishvili, J. Lynch, A. Shuaib, A. Woolfenden, and J. W. Norris Cervical Arterial Dissection: Time for a Therapeutic Trial? Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2856 - 2860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Cohen, J. M. Gomori, and F. Umansky Endovascular Management of Spontaneous Bilateral Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Dissections AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 2052 - 2056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ohkuma, S. Suzuki, and K. Ogane Dissecting Aneurysms of Intracranial Carotid Circulation Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 941 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. I. Schievink Spontaneous Dissection of the Carotid and Vertebral Arteries N. Engl. J. Med., March 22, 2001; 344(12): 898 - 906. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Touze, B. Randoux, E. Meary, C. Arquizan, J.-F. Meder, and J.-L. Mas Aneurysmal Forms of Cervical Artery Dissection : Associated Factors and Outcome Stroke, February 1, 2001; 32(2): 418 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Quint Indications for Emergent MRI of the Central Nervous System JAMA, February 16, 2000; 283(7): 853 - 855. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Guillon, L. Brunereau, V. Biousse, H. Djouhri, C. Levy, and M.-G. Bousser Long-term follow-up of aneurysms developed during extracranial internal carotid artery dissection Neurology, July 1, 1999; 53(1): 117 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hosoya, M. Adachi, K. Yamaguchi, T. Haku, T. Kayama, and T. Kato Clinical and Neuroradiological Features of Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery Dissection Stroke, May 1, 1999; 30(5): 1083 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |