This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dippel, D. W. J. Articles by Koudstaal, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dippel, D. W. J. Articles by Koudstaal, P. J.

(Stroke. 1997;28:2483-2485.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Interobserver Agreement for 10% Categories of Angiographic Carotid Stenosis

Diederik W. J. Dippel, MD; Fop van Kooten, MD; Stef L. M. Bakker, MD; Peter J. Koudstaal, MD

From the Department of Neurology, University Hospital Rotterdam (Netherlands).

Correspondence to Diederik W.J. Dippel, MD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands. E-mail dippel{at}neuro.fgg.eur.nl

Background and Purpose Although the reliability of the assessment of severe 70% to 99% carotid stenosis by carotid angiography has been proven excellent, this may not necessarily be the case for a more detailed classification of carotid stenoses by 10% categories.

Methods Angiograms of the carotid arteries were assessed pairwise by three independent, experienced observers. The measurements of the degree of stenosis of both the carotid bifurcation and the internal carotid artery were made according to the European Carotid Surgery Trial method. Kappa statistics were used to assess the agreement beyond chance for severe (70% to 99%) carotid stenosis (₁) and for 10% categories of carotid stenosis (₂). The penalty scores were adjusted by weights for the relative difference in risk (RDR) of stroke in the ipsilateral carotid distribution between the 10% categories (₃). An adjustment of the RDR method was made by assuming that only patients with a severe carotid stenosis would undergo surgery, and the penalty would be 0 if no disagreement would exist about the indication for surgery (₄). An even further adjustment (₅) was made by assuming that assessment of the rate of carotid stenosis by one or both observers would lead to different treatment recommendations in 50% of the cases, and accordingly the penalty for disagreement (RDR) was halved.

Results One hundred twenty-one carotid bifurcations in 65 patients with a transient ischemic attack or nondisabling stroke were assessed. The intraclass correlation between the exact estimates of carotid stenosis was .90 (95% confidence interval, .85 to .92). The mean difference in stenosis between the two raters was 0.8% (95% confidence interval, -2.1% to 3.7%). ₁ to ₅ equaled 0.80, 0.40, 0.79, 0.91, and 0.92, respectively.

Conclusions Interobserver agreement for distinct 10% categories of angiographic carotid stenosis is moderate, but when realistic risk- and decision-based weights are used, agreement between experienced observers can be almost perfect.

Key Words: angiography, digital subtraction • carotid stenosis • observer variation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. van Gijn Cerebral vasoconstriction, headache and sometimes stroke: one syndrome or many? Brain, December 1, 2007; 130(12): 3060 - 3062. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Heiserman Measurement Error of Percent Diameter Carotid Stenosis Determined by Conventional Angiography: Implications for Noninvasive Evaluation AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2102 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M Hathout, M. J. Duh, and S. M. El-Saden Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Predicting Angiographic Stenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery: Linear Regression Analysis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2003; 24(9): 1747 - 1756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S G Patel, D A Collie, J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, A R Wright, R J Gibson, and R J Sellar Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2002; 73(1): 21 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. Grant, A. J. Duerinckx, S. M. El Saden, M. L. Melany, G. M. Hathout, P. T. Zimmerman, A. K. Marumoto, S. N. Cohen, and J. D. Baker Ability to Use Duplex US to Quantify Internal Carotid Arterial Stenoses: Fact or Fiction?1 Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 247 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text]