(Stroke. 1997;28:343-347.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Consistency of Doppler Parameters in Predicting Arteriographically Confirmed Carotid Stenosis
the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health of University of South Florida (Tampa) (S.W.S.); the Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (L.E.C.); the Section of Vascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical School, Maywood, Ill (W.H.B.); the Department of Neurology of University of Cincinnati (Ohio) Medical School (J.P.B.); and the Department of Public Health Sciences and Stroke Center, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC (G.H.).
Background and Purpose While internal carotid peak systolic velocity (IPSV) is reportedly the best Doppler parameter for predicting lower grades of carotid artery stenosis, the internal carotid end-diastolic velocity (IEDV) or the ratio of IPSV to common carotid end-diastolic velocity (CEDV) is helpful in increasing prediction of higher grade stenoses. It is important to examine the consistency of these findings across machine and technician.
Methods Using data from 10 devices from the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, we examined the predictive ability of seven Doppler parameters: IPSV, IEDV, CEDV, common carotid peak systolic velocity (CPSV), and the ratios of IPSV/CEDV, IEDV/CEDV, and IEDV/CEDV. To assess the agreement between Doppler and arteriography in classifying percent stenosis above or below a given criterion, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating curve, and 
statistics were obtained from logistic models. The single best Doppler parameter for each of two grades of stenosis (60% and 80%) was determined, and its predictive ability was compared with that of IPSV. The usefulness of IEDV or IPSV/CEDV in addition to IPSV to determine higher grade stenosis was examined.
Results IPSV was the best predictor in 9 of 10 devices at 60% and in 4 devices at 80% stenosis. When another parameter was better than IPSV, the improvement was minimal. Including IEDV or IPSV/CEDV in addition to IPSV did not notably improve predictive ability.
Conclusions IPSV is the single best Doppler parameter for distinguishing severe (>80%) from less severe carotid stenosis. Information from other Doppler parameters in addition to IPSV is unlikely to be helpful.
Key Words: angiography • carotid stenosis • Doppler • ultrasonics
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos Noninvasive Carotid Imaging Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Artieda, A. Cenarro, A. Ganan, I. Jerico, C. Gonzalvo, J. M. Casado, I. Vitoria, J. Puzo, M. Pocovi, and F. Civeira Serum Chitotriosidase Activity Is Increased in Subjects With Atherosclerosis Disease Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2003; 23(9): 1645 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, and M.G. M. Hunink Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1324 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. B. Anderson, R. Ashforth, D. E. Steinke, R. Ferdinandy, and J. M. Findlay CT Angiography for the Detection and Characterization of Carotid Artery Bifurcation Disease Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31(9): 2168 - 2174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. S. Lee, B. S. Hertzberg, M. J. Workman, T. P. Smith, M. A. Kliewer, D. M. DeLong, and B. A. Carroll Variability of Doppler US Measurements along the Common Carotid Artery: Effects on Estimates of Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis in Patients with Angiographically Proved Disease Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 387 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. W. Droste, R. Jurgens, D. G. Nabavi, G. Schuierer, S. Weber, and E. B. Ringelstein Echocontrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery High-Grade Stenosis and Occlusion Stroke, November 1, 1999; 30(11): 2302 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. S. Lee, B. S. Hertzberg, M. A. Kliewer, and B. A. Carroll Assessment of Stenosis: Implications of Variability of Doppler Measurements in Normal-appearing Carotid Arteries Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 493 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Castaldo Is Carotid Endarterectomy Appropiate for Asymptomatic Stenosis?: Yes Arch Neurol, July 1, 1999; 56(7): 877 - 879. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Sharma, G. C. Brown, J. L. Pater, and A. F. Cruess Does a Visible Retinal Embolus Increase the Likelihood of Hemodynamically Significant Carotid Artery Stenosis in Patients With Acute Retinal Arterial Occlusion? Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 1998; 116(12): 1602 - 1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. T. Longstreth Jr, L. Shemanski, D. Lefkowitz, D. H. O'Leary, J. F. Polak, and S. K. Wolfson Jr Asymptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Defined by Ultrasound and the Risk of Subsequent Stroke in the Elderly : The Cardiovascular Health Study Stroke, November 1, 1998; 29(11): 2371 - 2376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. S. Moore, R. F. Kempczinski, J. J. Nelson, and J. F. Toole Recurrent Carotid Stenosis : Results of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Stroke, October 1, 1998; 29(10): 2018 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|