| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1997;28:1541-1549.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Assessing Quality of Life After Stroke
The Value and Limitations of Proxy Ratings
From the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (K.C.A.S., N.K.A.), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; and the Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (R.J. de H.) and Neurology (M.L.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background and Purpose Because many stroke survivors have cognitive and communication disorders, self-reported information on a patient's quality of life (QL) cannot always be obtained. Proxy ratings may be used to prevent exclusion of this highly relevant subgroup of patients from QL studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate both the value and possible limitations of such proxy ratings.
Methods The patient sample was composed of 437 patients who had suffered a stroke 6 months earlier. QL was assessed by means of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). For 108 patients who were not communicative because of cognitive or linguistic deficits, proxy ratings on the SIP were provided by the patients' significant others. For 228 of the 329 communicative patients, both self-reported and proxy SIP ratings were obtained.
Results When mean SIP scores for patients with both self-reported and proxy-derived data available were compared, the proxy mean scores were generally in close agreement with those of the patients. However, systematic differences were noted for several SIP scales, with proxies rating patients as having more QL impairments than the patients themselves. Intraclass correlations were moderate to high for most SIP subscales (average intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.63), the physical (ICC=.85) and psychosocial dimensions (ICC=.61), and the total SIP score (ICC=.77). The proxy SIP scores were sensitive to differences in patients' functional health, which supports the validity of these ratings. For all patients combined, more QL impairments were found for patients with supratentorial cortical or subcortical infarctions and hemorrhages than for patients with lacunar infarctions and infratentorial strokes. Although proxy respondents were more frequently needed for patients with the first two types of stroke, we found no evidence of biased results as a consequence of an unbalanced use of proxy respondents across the different types of stroke.
Conclusions These results suggest that the benefits of using proxy ratings for noncommunicative patients outweigh their limitations. The findings stress the need for inclusion of this important subgroup of patients in QL studies. Their significant others are able to provide useful information on these patients' QL.
Key Words: cerebrovascular disorders • quality of life • stroke assessment • stroke outcome
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  K. Hilari, S. Owen, and S. J. Farrelly Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 78(10): 1072 - 1075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. W. Gargano, M. J. Reeves, and for the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Regis Sex Differences in Stroke Recovery and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life: Results From a Statewide Stroke Registry Stroke, September 1, 2007; 38(9): 2541 - 2548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. D. Patel, C. McKevitt, E. Lawrence, A. G. Rudd, and C. D. A. Wolfe Clinical determinants of long-term quality of life after stroke Age Ageing, May 1, 2007; 36(3): 316 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Resnizky and N. Bentur Can Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients Be a Reliable Source of Information About the Severity of Patient Symptoms? American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2007; 23(6): 447 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. L. Eadie, K. M. Yorkston, E. R. Klasner, B. J. Dudgeon, J. C. Deitz, C. R. Baylor, R. M. Miller, and D. Amtmann Measuring communicative participation: a review of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2006; 15(4): 307 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F A H van der Linden, J J Kragt, J C Hobart, M Klein, A J Thompson, H M van der Ploeg, C H Polman, and B M J Uitdehaag Proxy measurements in multiple sclerosis: agreement between patients and their partners on the impact of multiple sclerosis in daily life J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2006; 77(10): 1157 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. S. Williams, T. Bakas, E. Brizendine, L. Plue, W. Tu, H. Hendrie, and K. Kroenke How Valid Are Family Proxy Assessments of Stroke Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life? Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2081 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. G. Breugelmans, D. E. Ford, P. L. Smith, and N. M. Punjabi Differences in Patient and Bed Partner-assessed Quality of Life in Sleep-disordered Breathing Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2004; 170(5): 547 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N J. A van Exel, W. J. S. op Reimer, W. B. Brouwer, B. van den Berg, M. A Koopmanschap, and G. A. van den Bos Instruments for assessing the burden of informal caregiving for stroke patients in clinical practice: a comparison of CSI, CRA, SCQ and self-rated burden Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2004; 18(2): 203 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Pickard, J. A. Johnson, D. H. Feeny, A. Shuaib, K.C. Carriere, and A. M. Nasser Agreement Between Patient and Proxy Assessments of Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke Using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 607 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Gasquet, S. Dehe, P. Gaudebout, and B. Falissard Regular Visitors Are Not Good Substitutes for Assessment of Elderly Patient Satisfaction With Nursing Home Care and Services J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2003; 58(11): M1036 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Hilari, S. Byng, D. L. Lamping, and S. C. Smith Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39): Evaluation of Acceptability, Reliability, and Validity Stroke, August 1, 2003; 34(8): 1944 - 1950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. R Tooth, K. T McKenna, and M. Smith Further evidence for the agreement between patients with stroke and their proxies on the Frenchay Activities Index Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 656 - 665. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Trigg and V. A Wood The validation of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2003; 17(3): 283 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Low and G. Gutman Couples' Ratings of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients' Quality of Life Clin Nurs Res, February 1, 2003; 12(1): 28 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. Duncan, S. M. Lai, D. Tyler, S. Perera, D. M. Reker, and S. Studenski Evaluation of Proxy Responses to the Stroke Impact Scale Stroke, November 1, 2002; 33(11): 2593 - 2599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. I. Cameron and M. D. Buck Facilitating Data Collection in Stroke Patients and the Elderly Response Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31 (12): 3079 - 3083. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Buck, A. Jacoby, A. Massey, and G. Ford Evaluation of Measures Used to Assess Quality of Life After Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 2004 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. Duncan, H. S. Jorgensen, and D. T. Wade Outcome Measures in Acute Stroke Trials : A Systematic Review and Some Recommendations to Improve Practice Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1429 - 1438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Hackett, J. R. Duncan, C. S. Anderson, J. B. Broad, and R. Bonita Health-Related Quality of Life Among Long-Term Survivors of Stroke : Results From the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992 Stroke, February 1, 2000; 31(2): 440 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Trigg, V. A Wood, and R. L. Hewer Social reintegration after stroke: the first stages in the development of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 1999; 13(4): 341 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|