Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1997;28:1755-1760

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chamorro, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chamorro, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, J. P.

(Stroke. 1997;28:1755-1760.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Motor Behavior in Stroke Patients With Isolated Medial Frontal Ischemic Infarction

Angel Chamorro, MD; Randolph S. Marshall, MD; Josep Valls-Solé, MD; Eduardo Tolosa, MD; J. P. Mohr, MD

From the Neurology Service of the Hospital Clínic University, Barcelona, Spain (A.C., J.V.-S., E.T.), and the Department of Neurology of the Neurological Institute, Columbia–Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY (R.S.M., J.P.M.).

Background and Purpose Current interpretation of hemiparesis in anterior cerebral artery infarction holds that whereas leg weakness correlates with destruction of the corticospinal tract at the paracentral lobe, faciobrachial symptoms indicate extension of the infarct to the upper lateral convexity or to subcortical structures, where the corticospinal tract subserving the arm would be interrupted. We analyzed the motor behavior in eight patients with purely medial hemispheric infarctions who had face, arm, and leg involvement.

Methods In addition to careful clinical testing, we performed neuroimaging or pathological studies to exclude the involvement of the primary motor cortex or subcortical structures. Motor function was further tested in three patients by studying the reaction time to an auditory stimulus and by stimulating the motor cortex and the cervical and lumbar spine with a magnetic stimulator.

Results All patients had signs of motor neglect, such as lack of spontaneous movement in the upper limb, unilateral reaction to pain stimuli, clumsy voluntary movements, or motor impairment on bimanual tasks. Electrophysiologically, we found absent or poor voluntary activity in both upper and lower limbs contralateral to the infarction. However, whereas cortical stimulation showed absent responses in the lower limb, it disclosed normal latencies in the upper limb, indicating that the corticospinal tract to paretic muscles of the upper limb was intact.

Conclusions Our findings suggest that faciobrachial symptoms in purely medial hemispheric infarctions in the anterior cerebral artery territory reflect motor neglect caused not by involvement of primary motor pathways but by damage to medial premotor areas.


Key Words: cerebral arteries • cerebral infarction • hemiplegia • magnetics • motor activity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. Y. Kang and J. S. Kim
Anterior cerebral artery infarction: Stroke mechanism and clinical-imaging study in 100 patients
Neurology, June 10, 2008; 70(24_Part_2): 2386 - 2393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
G. R. de Freitas, G. Devuyst, G. van Melle, and J. Bogousslavsky
Motor Strokes Sparing the Leg: Different Lesions and Causes
Arch Neurol, April 1, 2000; 57(4): 513 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]