Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karp, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karp, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Medicare

(Stroke. 1998;29:46-52.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Carotid Endarterectomy Among Medicare Beneficiaries

A Statewide Evaluation of Appropriateness and Outcome

Herbert R. Karp, MD; W. Dana Flanders, MD, DSc; Clanton C. Shipp, MPA, MSOR; Brenda Taylor, BSN, MHA; Debra Martin, RN

From Georgia Medical Care Foundation (H.R.K., W.D.F., C.C.S., B.T., D.M.) and Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University (W.D.F.), Atlanta, Ga.

Background and Purpose—We sought to examine the appropriateness and the surgical outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CE) in unselected community hospitals to identify opportunities for improvement.

Methods—We performed a retrospective review of all CEs performed on Medicare beneficiaries in Georgia in 1993 (n=1945). Conclusions regarding appropriateness were based on current guidelines as interpreted by a physician reviewer and were supported by the aggregate results of structured, blinded overreading by clinicians with relevant expertise. Adverse outcomes were confirmed and rated as to severity by a physician. Outcomes were correlated with demography, vascular anatomic findings, comorbidity, surgical techniques, and hospital characteristics.

Results—The majority of the patients (51%) were asymptomatic at presentation. CEs were performed appropriately in 96.1% of the cases in accordance with current guidelines. There was no significant difference in the rate of appropriateness between the symptomatic (96%) and the asymptomatic patients (96.4%). Survival without stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) was 94.3%. The 30-day mortality was 1.9%; moderate to severe strokes occurred in 1.8%, stroke-related death in 0.7%, MI in 1.1%, and MI-related death in 0.5%. Those hospitals performing <10 CEs in the observed year had a statistically significant higher morbidity and mortality as well as an increase in less severe complications such as hematomas, wound dehiscence, wound infection, and pneumonia than did hospitals with higher volume of CEs.. Older patients and women had statistically significantly higher morbidity and mortality. Patients with a Charlson Severity Index score of >=1 had a risk for adverse outcomes 3.4 times higher than patients with a score of 0 after adjustment for age and sex.

Conclusions—The great majority of CEs performed in Georgia on Medicare patients were appropriate, according to current guidelines. Slightly more than half of the patients were asymptomatic as defined in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. In hospitals performing <CEs in the index year, we noted higher morbidity and mortality, as well as an increase in less severe complications. This relationship between the volume of surgery and outcome was confirmed in the analysis of the 30-day mortality for all Medicare cases (n=10 569) performed in Georgia from 1991 to 1995. This was the most important opportunity for improvement identified in this study. In view of the increased use of CE, it is important to continue to monitor the patterns of practice for this procedure to improve outcomes.


Key Words: appropriateness review • carotid artery disease • community hospitals • endarterectomy • outcome • physicians' practice patterns • retrospective chart review • utilization review




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Screening for Carotid Artery Stenosis: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2007; 147(12): 854 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. Wolff, J. Guirguis-Blake, T. Miller, M. Gillespie, and R. Harris
Screening for Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2007; 147(12): 860 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. L. Smith, L. S. Elting, P. A. Learn, C. P. Raut, and P. F. Mansfield
Factors Influencing the Volume-Outcome Relationship in Gastrectomies: A Population-Based Study
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 14(6): 1846 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
E. A. Halm, S. Tuhrim, J. J. Wang, M. Rojas, E. L. Hannan, and M. R. Chassin
Has evidence changed practice?: Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials
Neurology, January 16, 2007; 68(3): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S R Messe, S E Kasner, Z Mehta, C P Warlow, P M Rothwell, and for the European Carotid Surgery Trialists
Effect of body size on operative risk of carotid endarterectomy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2004; 75(12): 1759 - 1761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Bond, K. Rerkasem, and P.M. Rothwell
Systematic Review of the Risks of Carotid Endarterectomy in Relation to the Clinical Indication for and Timing of Surgery
Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2290 - 2301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. A. Halm, M. R. Chassin, S. Tuhrim, L. H. Hollier, A. J. Popp, E. Ascher, H. Dardik, G. Faust, and T. S. Riles
Revisiting the Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy
Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1464 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. K. Kapral, H. Wang, P. C. Austin, J. Fang, D. Kucey, B. Bowyer, and J. V. Tu
Sex Differences in Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes: Results From the Ontario Carotid Endarterectomy Registry
Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1120 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Ballotta
Editorial Comment--Female Sex: A Questionable Risk Factor for Carotid Endarterectomy
Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1124 - 1125.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. A. Halm, C. Lee, and M. R. Chassin
Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature
Ann Intern Med, September 17, 2002; 137(6): 511 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
H. J.M. Barnett, H. E. Meldrum, and M. Eliasziw
The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 1, 2002; 166(9): 1169 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. A. Gray, H. J. White Jr, D. M. Barrett, G. Chandran, R. Turner, and M. Reisman
Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy: A Clinical and Cost Comparison of Revascularization Strategies
Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 1063 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
C. Olcott IV, R. S. Mitchell, G. K. Steinberg, and C. K. Zarins
Institutional Peer Review Can Reduce the Risk and Cost of Carotid Endarterectomy
Arch Surg, August 1, 2000; 135(8): 939 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
A. R. Naylor
Carotid Endarterectomy: Surgical Techniques, Emboli, and Outcomes
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 2000; 4(2): 110 - 114.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Inzitari, M. Eliasziw, P. Gates, B. L. Sharpe, R. K.T. Chan, H. E. Meldrum, H. J.M. Barnett, and The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterect
The Causes and Risk of Stroke in Patients with Asymptomatic Internal-Carotid-Artery Stenosis
N. Engl. J. Med., June 8, 2000; 342(23): 1693 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. A. Dudley, K. L. Johansen, R. Brand, D. J. Rennie, and A. Milstein
Selective Referral to High-Volume Hospitals: Estimating Potentially Avoidable Deaths
JAMA, March 1, 2000; 283(9): 1159 - 1166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
K. A. Goldman, A. Singhal, S. P. Kahn, J. T. Davidson, N. Patel, T. Patel, and M. Patel
Carotid Artery Endarterectomy in the Octogenarian: A Community Hospital Experience
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, September 1, 1999; 33(5): 451 - 460.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. B. Gorelick
Carotid Endarterectomy : Where Do We Draw the Line?
Stroke, September 1, 1999; 30(9): 1745 - 1750.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. Bodenheimer
The Movement for Improved Quality in Health Care
N. Engl. J. Med., February 11, 1999; 340(6): 488 - 492.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. H. Wong, T. B. Lubkey, M. E. Suarez-Almazor, and J. M. Findlay
Improving the Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy : Results of a Prospective City-Wide Study
Stroke, January 1, 1999; 30(1): 12 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]