This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huber, T. S. Articles by Seeger, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huber, T. S. Articles by Seeger, J. M.

(Stroke. 1998;29:1099-1105.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Effect of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study on Carotid Endarterectomy in Florida

Thomas S. Huber, MD, PhD; Kevin G. Wheeler, BS; John K. Cuddeback, MD, PhD; Douglas A. Dame, MBA; Timothy C. Flynn, MD; James M. Seeger, MD

From the Department of Surgery (T.S.H., T.C.F., J.M.S.), University of Florida College of Medicine; the Department of Surgery (T.C.F.), Gainesville Veterans Administration Medical Center; and the Department of Health Policy and Epidemiology (K.G.W., J.K.C., D.A.D.) of the University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla; and the Duke University School of Medicine (K.G.W.), Durham, NC.

Correspondence to Thomas S. Huber, MD, PhD, Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, PO Box 100286, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610-0286. E-mail Huber{at}surgery.ufl.edu

Background and Purpose—The value of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been defined by several recent multicenter trials. The clinical effect of these trials remains undetermined since the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) Clinical Advisory (dated September 28, 1994).

Methods—Patients undergoing CEA (ICD-9-CM 38.12) in nonfederal Florida hospitals were identified from the discharge database. Data were analyzed by federal fiscal year (FY, October 1 through September 30), comparing the years following the Advisory (FY95-FY96) to the preceding 3 years (FY92-FY94).

Results—There was a 68.3% increase in the number of CEAs during FY95-FY96 (mean FY92-FY94, 7 343; mean FY95-FY96, 12 356). This exceeded increases in total hospital discharges (4.5%), surgical discharges (2.2%), and the state's population (4.7%). The increase in CEAs spanned all patient demographic groups (gender, race, and age), although the magnitude was not consistent (range, 57.8% increase for 55 to 64 age group; 92.9% increase for >84 age group). Concomitantly, there was a significant decrease in mortality (1.2% versus 0.8%), cardiac complication rate (ICD-9-CM 997.1, 4.1% versus 3.0%) and percentage of patients discharged >7 days postoperatively (8.9% versus 4.9%). Mean length of stay declined 28% (5.8 versus 4.1 days), and mean adjusted charges declined 7% ($19 456 versus $18 055). Although the average case was less costly, the increased volume resulted in an estimated $56 million increase in annual hospital payments.

Conclusions—The dramatic increase in the number of CEAs performed in the state of Florida after release of the ACAS Clinical Advisory suggests a causal relationship and mandates further cost-effectiveness analyses.

Key Words: carotid arteries • carotid endarterectomy • cerebrovascular disorders • epidemiology • stroke prevention

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Betancourt, R. B. Van Stavern, D. Share, P. Gardella, M. Martus, and S. Chaturvedi Are patients receiving maximal medical therapy following carotid endarterectomy? Neurology, December 14, 2004; 63(11): 2011 - 2015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Ballotta Editorial Comment--Female Sex: A Questionable Risk Factor for Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1124 - 1125. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chaturvedi, R. Aggarwal, and A. Murugappan Results of carotid endarterectomy with prospective neurologist follow-up Neurology, September 26, 2000; 55(6): 769 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. B. Gorelick Carotid Endarterectomy : Where Do We Draw the Line? Stroke, September 1, 1999; 30(9): 1745 - 1750. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chaturvedi Is Carotid Endarterectomy Appropriate for Asymptomatic Stenosis?: No Arch Neurol, July 1, 1999; 56(7): 879 - 881. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Muluk Natural History of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: When Should We Operate and Why? Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1999; 12(1): 15 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. J.M. Barnett, D. W. Taylor, M. Eliasziw, A. J. Fox, G. G. Ferguson, R. B. Haynes, R. N. Rankin, G. P. Clagett, V. C. Hachinski, D. L. Sackett, et al. Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate or Severe Stenosis N. Engl. J. Med., November 12, 1998; 339(20): 1415 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chaturvedi, T. S. Huber, K. G. Wheeler, J. K. Cuddeback, D. A. Dame, T. C. Flynn, and J. M. Seeger Is the Increasing Volume of Carotid Endarterectomy Justified? • Response Stroke, November 1, 1998; 29(11): 2444 - 2446. [Full Text] [PDF]