Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1998;29:1843-1849

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grimby, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grimby, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, B.

(Stroke. 1998;29:1843-1849.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Dependence and Perceived Difficulty in Daily Activities in Community-Living Stroke Survivors 2 Years After Stroke

A Study of Instrumental Structures

Gunnar Grimby, MD, PhD; Eva Andrén, BSc, OT; Yvonne Daving, MSc, OT; Benjamin Wright, PhD

From the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine (G.G., E.A., Y.D.) and Handicap Research (E.A.), Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden, and the Department of Education, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (B.W.).

Correspondence to Professor Gunnar Grimby, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-41345 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail Gunnar.Grimby{at}rehab.gu.se

Background and Purpose—There is a need for better understanding of the structure of instruments for functional outcome assessment after discharge from rehabilitation. One purpose of the study was to contribute to the analysis of instrumental dimensionality. Another purpose was to compare disability in stroke patients within the younger age range 2 years after onset of stroke with that at discharge with respect to both dependence and patients' perceived difficulty and to extend the assessments with instrumental activities.

Methods—We studied 68 stroke survivors aged 18 to 71 years at onset (59% aged <55 years) by means of interviews in their home, using activities from the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Instrumental Activity Measure (IAM) for ratings of dependence and perceived difficulty. Rasch analysis was used to construct calibrated linear measures and to evaluate the level of fit.

Results—Acceptable models for comparison of dependence between discharge and follow-up were found for the physical and the social-cognitive items in FIM. However, personal care and social-cognitive items showed an increased level of dependence at follow-up compared with at discharge. A combination of physical activities from FIM and IAM also gave acceptable models for both dependence and perceived difficulty, and the hierarchical orders of activities are presented. In general, there was agreement between the ratings of dependence and perceived difficulty, but with some discrepancies. Men found it harder to be independent in such instrumental activities as cooking and cleaning than women; the opposite was true for small-scale shopping and locomotion outdoors. Subjects aged >=55 years had slightly higher level of dependence and perceived difficulty in IAM activities than those below that age.

Conclusions—Changes in the hierarchical order of activities should be taken into account in follow-up studies. Differences in the environment between hospital and home, as well as differences in support and motivation, might explain the relatively larger degree of dependence at follow-up compared with at discharge and indicate the need for further rehabilitation efforts. Instrumental activities could be combined with FIM activities in a model. For individual items, ratings of both dependence and perceived difficulty may provide further insight into the disablement process.


Key Words: activities of daily living • disability evaluation • rehabilitation • stroke outcome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Lord, K. M McPherson, H. K McNaughton, L. Rochester, and M. Weatherall
How feasible is the attainment of community ambulation after stroke? A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate community-based physiotherapy in subacute stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2008; 22(3): 215 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E Rydwik, C Karlsson, K Frandin, and G Akner
Muscle strength testing with one repetition maximum in the arm/shoulder for people aged 75 + - test-retest reliability
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2007; 21(3): 258 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Bjorkdahl, A{d.}s. L. Nilsson, G. Grimby, and K. S. Sunnerhagen
Does a short period of rehabilitation in the home setting facilitate functioning after stroke? A randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2006; 20(12): 1038 - 1049.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
U. Sveen, B. Thommessen, E. Bautz-Holter, T. B. Wyller, and K. Laake
Well-being and instrumental activities of daily living after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2004; 18(3): 267 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Penta, L. Tesio, C. Arnould, A. Zancan, and J.-L. Thonnard
The ABILHAND Questionnaire as a Measure of Manual Ability in Chronic Stroke Patients : Rasch-Based Validation and Relationship to Upper Limb Impairment
Stroke, July 1, 2001; 32(7): 1627 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
Y. Daving, E. Andren, L. Nordholm, and G. Grimby
Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2001; 15(3): 301 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]