Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1998;29:1854-1859

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Escudero, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by López-Trigo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Escudero, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by López-Trigo, J.

(Stroke. 1998;29:1854-1859.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Prognostic Value of Motor Evoked Potential Obtained by Transcranial Magnetic Brain Stimulation in Motor Function Recovery in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Joaquín V. Escudero, MD, PhD; Jerónimo Sancho, MD, PhD; Daniel Bautista, MD, PhD; Manuel Escudero, MD, PhD; Javier López-Trigo, MD

From the Department of Neurology, Castellón General Hospital (J.V.E.); Department of Neurology, Valencia University School of Medicine, Valencia University General Hospital (J.S.); Department of Public Health, Research Service, Valencia University Clinic Hospital (D.B.); Department of Neurophysiology, University Peset Hospital, Valencia (M.E.); and Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Valencia University General Hospital (J.L.-T.) (Spain).

Background and Purpose—The early prognostic application of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) for assessing motor and functional recovery in ischemic stroke patients has yielded contradictory results. We performed a prospective study of patients with acute ischemic stroke and motor deficit to evaluate the early prognostic value of TMS in motor and functional recovery.

Methods—Fifty patients with different degrees of hemiparesis were studied in the first week after ischemic stroke and evaluated by clinical scales (Medical Research Council Scale, Canadian Neurological Scale, Barthel Index), with clinical follow-up over 6 months. TMS (Magstim 200) was performed at the same time, recording the motor evoked potential (MEP) in the thenar eminence muscles, with facilitation by voluntary contraction.

Results—Of the total group of 50 patients, MEP was absent in 20 and present in 30 (17 with normal and 13 with delayed central conduction time [CCT]). The patients with MEP showed better motor and functional recovery than those without. The MEP provided information on patient recovery, regardless of the initial strength and/or Barthel values. The degree of recovery was better in those patients with normal CCT than in those with delayed CCT.

Conclusions—MEP obtained by TMS in patients with hemiparesis after acute ischemic stroke is useful as an early prognostic indicator of motor and functional recovery. This technique would allow the early identification of those patients who will have a good recovery, particularly among those with severe initial paresis.


Key Words: evoked potentials, motor • prognosis • stimulation, transcranial magnetic • stroke, acute • stroke, ischemic




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
R. E. Frye, A. Rotenberg, M. Ousley, and A. Pascual-Leone
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Child Neurology: Current and Future Directions
J Child Neurol, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 79 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Hatakenaka, I. Miyai, S. Sakoda, and T. Yanagihara
Proximal paresis of the upper extremity in patients with stroke
Neurology, July 24, 2007; 69(4): 348 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. J Butler and S. L Wolf
Putting the Brain on the Map: Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Assess and Induce Cortical Plasticity of Upper-Extremity Movement
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 719 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Desmurget, F. Bonnetblanc, and H. Duffau
Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity
Brain, April 1, 2007; 130(4): 898 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, P. R. Smale, J. P. Coxon, M. K. Fleming, and W. D. Byblow
Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity
Brain, January 1, 2007; 130(1): 170 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
F. Binkofski and R. J. Seitz
Modulation of the BOLD-response in early recovery from sensorimotor stroke
Neurology, October 12, 2004; 63(7): 1223 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Pennisi, G. Rapisarda, R. Bella, V. Calabrese, A. Maertens de Noordhout, and P. J. Delwaide
Absence of Response to Early Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke Patients : Prognostic Value for Hand Motor Recovery
Stroke, December 1, 1999; 30(12): 2666 - 2670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]