Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vass, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vass, C. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 1999;30:573-579.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Increased Intensity of Physiotherapy Treatment of Arm Function After Stroke

Nadina B. Lincoln, PhD; Ruth H. Parry, MMedSci Catherine D. Vass, MSc

From the School of Psychology, University of Nottingham (N.B.L.), and the Division of Stroke Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital (R.H.P., C.D.V.), Nottingham, UK.

Correspondence to Dr Nadina B. Lincoln, Reader in Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. E-mail nbl{at}psychology.nottingham.ac.uk

Background and Purpose—Many patients have impaired arm function after stroke, for which they receive physiotherapy. The aim of the study was to determine whether increasing the amount of physiotherapy early after stroke improved the recovery of arm function and to compare the effects of this therapy when administered by a qualified therapist or a trained, supervised assistant. The physiotherapy followed a typical British approach, which is Bobath derived. Ten hours of additional therapy were given over a 5-week period.

Methods—The study design was a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Stroke patients were recruited from those admitted to the hospital in the 5 weeks after stroke. They were randomly allocated to routine physiotherapy, additional treatment by a qualified physiotherapist, or additional treatment by a physiotherapy assistant. Outcome was assessed after 5 weeks of treatment and at 3 and 6 months after stroke on measures of arm function and of independence in activities of daily living.

Results—There were 282 patients recruited to the study. The median initial Barthel score was 6.5, and the median age of the patients was 73 years. The median initial Rivermead Motor Assessment Arm score was 1. There were no significant differences between the groups at randomization or on any of the outcome measures. Only half of the patients allocated to the 2 additional-therapy groups completed the program.

Conclusions—This increase in the amount of physiotherapy for arm impairment with a typical British approach given early after stroke did not significantly improve the recovery of arm function in the patients studied. A number of other studies of interventions aimed at rehabilitation of arm function have reported positive results. Such findings may have been due to the content of these interventions, to the greater intensity of the interventions, or to the selection of patients to whom the treatments were applied.


Key Words: rehabilitation • physiotherapy • stroke • upper limb




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Rabadi, M. Galgano, D. Lynch, M Akerman, M. Lesser, and B. Volpe
A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2008; 22(12): 1071 - 1082.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. T. Volpe, D. Lynch, A. Rykman-Berland, M. Ferraro, M. Galgano, N. Hogan, and H. I. Krebs
Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 305 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Van de Winckel, H. Feys, N. Lincoln, and W. De Weerdt
Assessment of arm function in stroke patients: Rivermead Motor Assessment arm section revised with Rasch analysis
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2007; 21(5): 471 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
T. Ryan, P. Enderby, and A. S Rigby
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate intensity of community-based rehabilitation provision following stroke or hip fracture in old age
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2006; 20(2): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. W. Duncan, R. Zorowitz, B. Bates, J. Y. Choi, J. J. Glasberg, G. D. Graham, R. C. Katz, K. Lamberty, and D. Reker
Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline
Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): e100 - e143.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
T Platz, C Eickhof, S van Kaick, U Engel, C Pinkowski, S Kalok, and M Pause
Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2005; 19(7): 714 - 724.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. H. Dobkin
Rehabilitation after Stroke
N. Engl. J. Med., April 21, 2005; 352(16): 1677 - 1684.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P M van Vliet, N B Lincoln, and A Foxall
Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2005; 76(4): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
V. M. Pomeroy, C. A. Clark, J. S. G. Miller, J.-C. Baron, H. S. Markus, and R. C. Tallis
The Potential for Utilizing the "Mirror Neurone System" to Enhance Recovery of the Severely Affected Upper Limb Early after Stroke: A Review and Hypothesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2005; 19(1): 4 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
I. Davidson, V. F Hillier, K. Waters, T. Walton, and J. Booth
A study to assess the effect of nursing interventions at the weekend for people with stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2005; 19(2): 126 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Kwakkel, R. van Peppen, R. C. Wagenaar, S. Wood Dauphinee, C. Richards, A. Ashburn, K. Miller, N. Lincoln, C. Partridge, I. Wellwood, et al.
Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2529 - 2539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R P. Van Peppen, G Kwakkel, S Wood-Dauphinee, H J. Hendriks, P. J Van der Wees, and J Dekker
The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2004; 18(8): 833 - 862.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. J Turton and S. R Butler
A multiple case design experiment to investigate the performance and neural effects of a programme for training hand function after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2004; 18(7): 754 - 763.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. Meldrum, S. J Pittock, O. Hardiman, C. N. Dhuill, M. O'Regan, and J. T Moroney
Recovery of the upper limb post ischaemic stroke and the predictive value of the Orpington Prognostic Score
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 694 - 702.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
The Glasgow Augmented Physiotherapy Study (GAPS) g
Can augmented physiotherapy input enhance recovery of mobility after stroke? A randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2004; 18(5): 529 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. Feys, W. De Weerdt, G. Verbeke, G. C. Steck, C. Capiau, C. Kiekens, E. Dejaeger, G. Van Hoydonck, G. Vermeersch, and P. Cras
Early and Repetitive Stimulation of the Arm Can Substantially Improve the Long-Term Outcome After Stroke: A 5-Year Follow-up Study of a Randomized Trial
Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 924 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. G Canning, L. Ada, R. Adams, and N. J O'Dwyer
Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2004; 18(3): 300 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
T J. Bovend'Eerdt, H Dawes, H Johansen-Berg, and D T Wade
Evaluation of the Modifid Jebsen Test of Hand Function and the University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2004; 18(2): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. Barreca, S. L. Wolf, S. Fasoli, and R. Bohannon
Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2003; 17(4): 220 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, J. van der Grond, and A. J.H. Prevo
Probability of Regaining Dexterity in the Flaccid Upper Limb: Impact of Severity of Paresis and Time Since Onset in Acute Stroke
Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2181 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
H. Woldag, G. Waldmann, G. Heuschkel, and H. Hummelsheim
Is the repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements benefi cial for motor recovery in stroke patients?
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2003; 17(7): 723 - 730.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
H. Rodgers, J. Mackintosh, C. Price, R. Wood, P. McNamee, T. Fearon, A. Marritt, and R. Curless
Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome?
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 579 - 589.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
N. Goodwin and A. Sunderland
Intensive, time-series measurement of upper limb recovery in the subacute phase following stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 69 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. S Merians, D. Jack, R. Boian, M. Tremaine, G. C Burdea, S. V Adamovich, M. Recce, and H. Poizner
Virtual Reality-Augmented Rehabilitation for Patients Following Stroke
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2002; 82(9): 898 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. H van der Lee, L. D Roorda, H. Beckerman, G. J Lankhorst, and L. M Bouter
Improving the Action Research Arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2002; 16(6): 646 - 653.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. H van der Lee, I. A. Snels, H. Beckerman, G. J Lankhorst, R. C Wagenaar, and L. M Bouter
Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 20 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelstein, C. Diels, and M. Aisen
A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation
Neurology, May 23, 2000; 54(10): 1938 - 1944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelsteinn, C. M. Diels, and M. L. Aisen
Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years
Neurology, November 1, 1999; 53(8): 1874 - 1874.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Shutter, J. Whyte, P. N.B. Lincoln, and R. Parry
Increased Intensity of Physiotherapy After Stroke • Response
Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30 (10): 2238h - 2248.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R H Parry, N B Lincoln, and C D Vass
Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 1999; 13(3): 187 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]