(Stroke. 1999;30:917-923.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Treatment in a Combined Acute and Rehabilitation Stroke Unit
Which Aspects Are Most Important?
From the Department of Medicine (B.I., F.B., S.A.S., R.R.), University Hospital of Trondheim, and The Life Insurance Companies' Institute of Medical Statistics (L.L.H.), Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Correspondence to Dr Bent Indredavik, The Stroke Unit, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Trondheim, N 7006 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail inbe{at}online.no
Background and Purpose—We have previously shown that treatment of acute stroke patients in our stroke unit (SU) compared with treatment in general ward (GWs) improves short- and long-term survival and functional outcome and increases the possibility of earlier discharge to home. The aim of the present study was to identify the differences in treatment between the SU and the GW and to assess which aspects of the SU care which were most responsible for the better outcome.
Methods—Of the 220 patients included in our trial, only 206 were actually treated (SU, 102 patients; GW, 104 patients). For these patients, we identified the differences in the treatment and the consequences of the treatment. We analyzed the factors that we were able to measure and their association with the outcome, discharge to home within 6 weeks.
Results—Characteristic features in our SU were teamwork, staff education, functional training, and integrated physiotherapy and nursing. Other treatment factors significantly different in the SU from the GW were shorter time to start of the systematic mobilization/training and increased use of oxygen, heparin, intravenous saline solutions, and antipyretics. Consequences of the treatment seem to be less variation in diastolic and systolic blood pressure (BP), avoiding the lowest diastolic BP, and lowering the levels of glucose and temperature in the SU group compared with the GW group. Univariate analyses showed that all these factors except the level of glucose were significantly associated with discharge to home within 6 weeks. In the final multivariate Cox regression model, shorter time to start of the mobilization/training and stabilized diastolic BP were independent factors significantly associated with discharge to home within 6 weeks.
Conclusions—Shorter time to start of mobilization/training was the most important factor associated with discharge to home, followed by stabilized diastolic BP, indicating that these factors probably were important in the SU treatment. The effects of characteristic features of an SU, such as a specially trained staff, teamwork, and involvement of relatives, were not possible to measure. Such factors might be more important than those actually measured.
Key Words: randomized controlled trials • stroke management • stroke units
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. F Tyson, L. Connell, M. Busse, and S. Lennon What do acute stroke physiotherapists do to treat postural control and mobility? An exploration of the content of therapy in the UK Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 2009; 23(11): 1051 - 1055. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Bernhardt, N. Chitravas, I. L. Meslo, A. G. Thrift, and B. Indredavik Not All Stroke Units Are the Same: A Comparison of Physical Activity Patterns in Melbourne, Australia, and Trondheim, Norway Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 2059 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Indredavik, G. Rohweder, E. Naalsund, and S. Lydersen Medical Complications in a Comprehensive Stroke Unit and an Early Supported Discharge Service Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 414 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bernhardt, H. Dewey, A. Thrift, J. Collier, and G. Donnan A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial for Stroke (AVERT): Phase II Safety and Feasibility Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Langhammer, B. Lindmark, and J. K. Stanghelle Stroke patients and long-term training: is it worthwhile? A randomized comparison of two different training strategies after rehabilitation Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2007; 21(6): 495 - 510. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Rocco, M. Pasquini, E. Cecconi, G. Sirimarco, M. C. Ricciardi, E. Vicenzini, M. Altieri, V. Di Piero, and G. L. Lenzi Monitoring After the Acute Stage of Stroke: A Prospective Study Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1225 - 1228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Kwan and P. Hand Early neurological deterioration in acute stroke: clinical characteristics and impact on outcome QJM, September 1, 2006; 99(9): 625 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Part 9: Adult Stroke Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-111 - IV-120. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 9: Stroke Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-110 - III-104. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. Duncan, R. Zorowitz, B. Bates, J. Y. Choi, J. J. Glasberg, G. D. Graham, R. C. Katz, K. Lamberty, and D. Reker Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): e100 - e143. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Bagley, M. Hudson, A. Forster, J. Smith, and J. Young A randomized trial evaluation of the Oswestry Standing Frame for patients after stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2005; 19(4): 354 - 364. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Davidson, V. F Hillier, K. Waters, T. Walton, and J. Booth A study to assess the effect of nursing interventions at the weekend for people with stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2005; 19(2): 126 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H Markus Variations in care and outcome in the first year after stroke: a Western and Central European perspective J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2004; 75(12): 1660 - 1661. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C D A Wolfe, K Tilling, A Rudd, M Giroud, and D Inzitari Variations in care and outcome in the first year after stroke: a Western and Central European perspective J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2004; 75(12): 1702 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Dziewas, M Ritter, M Schilling, C Konrad, S Oelenberg, D G Nabavi, F Stogbauer, E B Ringelstein, and P Ludemann Pneumonia in acute stroke patients fed by nasogastric tube J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 75(6): 852 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Indredavik Intensive Monitoring Should Not Be the Routine Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 1019 - 1020. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bernhardt, H. Dewey, A. Thrift, and G. Donnan Inactive and Alone: Physical Activity Within the First 14 Days of Acute Stroke Unit Care Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 1005 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Weinrich, D. C. Good, M. Reding, E. J. Roth, D. X. Cifu, K. H. Silver, R. L. Craik, J. Magaziner, M. Terrin, M. Schwartz, et al. Timing, Intensity, and Duration of Rehabilitation for Hip Fracture and Stroke: Report of a Workshop at the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2004; 18(1): 12 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Carter, P Garside, and A Black Multidisciplinary team working, clinical networks, and chambers; opportunities to work differently in the NHS Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2003; 12(90001): i25 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Cavallini, G. Micieli, S. Marcheselli, and S. Quaglini Role of Monitoring in Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2599 - 2603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Fjaertoft, B. Indredavik, and S. Lydersen Stroke Unit Care Combined With Early Supported Discharge: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2687 - 2691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Yoneda, T. Uehara, H. Yamasaki, Y. Kita, M. Tabuchi, and E. Mori Hospital-Based Study of the Care and Cost of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Japan Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 718 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Sulter, J. W. Elting, M. Langedijk, N. M. Maurits, and J. De Keyser Admitting Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients to a Stroke Care Monitoring Unit Versus a Conventional Stroke Unit: A Randomized Pilot Study Stroke, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 101 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Appelros, I. Nydevik, A. Seiger, and A. Terent Predictors of Severe Stroke: Influence of Preexisting Dementia and Cardiac Disorders Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2357 - 2362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Fuentes, E. D. Tejedor, F. Harraf, and L. Kalra Re: Randomized Controlled Study of Stroke Unit Versus Stroke Team Care in Different Stroke Subtypes * Response Stroke, July 1, 2002; 33(7): 1740 - 1741. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Micieli, A. Cavallini, and S. Quaglini Guideline Compliance Improves Stroke Outcome: A Preliminary Study in 4 Districts in the Italian Region of Lombardia Stroke, May 1, 2002; 33(5): 1341 - 1347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Fieschi and A. Falcou Keynote address Neurology, September 1, 2001; 57(90002): S82 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Wolfe, A. Rudd, M. Dennis, C. Warlow, and P. Langhorne Taking acute stroke care seriously BMJ, July 7, 2001; 323(7303): 5 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. W Muir MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF STROKE J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2001; 70(90001): 12i - 16. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bhalla, C.D.A. Wolfe, and A.G. Rudd Management of acute physiological parameters after stroke QJM, March 1, 2001; 94(3): 167 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Indredavik, H. Fjartoft, G. Ekeberg, A. D. Loge, and B. Morch Benefit of an Extended Stroke Unit Service With Early Supported Discharge : A Randomized, Controlled Trial Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31(12): 2989 - 2994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rundek, H. Mast, A. Hartmann, B. Boden-Albala, L. Lennihan, I.-F. Lin, M. C. Paik, and R. L. Sacco Predictors of resource use after acute hospitalization: The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study Neurology, October 24, 2000; 55(8): 1180 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Sinha and E.A. Warburton The evolution of stroke units--towards a more intensive approach? QJM, September 1, 2000; 93(9): 633 - 638. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bhalla, S. Sankaralingam, R. Dundas, R. Swaminathan, C. D. A. Wolfe, and A. G. Rudd Influence of Raised Plasma Osmolality on Clinical Outcome After Acute Stroke Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31(9): 2043 - 2048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Slany, H. S. Jorgensen, DMSci, L. P. Kammersgaard, J. Houth, H. Nakayama, K. Larsen, T. S. Olsen, H. O. Raaschou, and P. Hubbe Treatment in the Stroke Unit Response Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31 (9): 2266 - 2278. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Indredavik, F. Bakke, S. A. Slordahl, R. Rokseth, and L. L. Haheim Stroke Unit Treatment : 10-Year Follow-Up Stroke, August 1, 1999; 30(8): 1524 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|