Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knapp, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hewison, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knapp, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hewison, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 1999;30:934-938.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Disagreement in Patient and Carer Assessment of Functional Abilities After Stroke

Peter Knapp, PhD Jenny Hewison, PhD

From the School of Healthcare Studies (P.K.) and School of Psychology (J.H.), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Correspondence to Dr P. Knapp, School of Healthcare Studies, 10 Clarendon Road, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NN, UK. E-mail p.r.knapp{at}leeds.ac.uk

Background and Purpose—The aims of this study were to describe differences between functional ability assessments made by stroke patients and their informal carers and to investigate the psychological associates of the difference in assessments.

Methods—A prospective design was used, with repeated assessments of function, mood, and carer strain. Thirty hospital stroke patients and their main carer were interviewed 3 times: within 1 month of stroke, 1 month after discharge, and 6 months after discharge.

Results—There were significant differences between patient and carer assessments at all 3 time points, with patient self-assessment less disabled than carer assessment (at least P<0.02). The disagreement in assessment was unrelated to patient or carer mood (P>0.05) but greater disagreement was associated with greater carer strain (P<0.05). The source of the disagreement in functional ability assessment remains unclear.

Conclusions—The method of assessment affects the rating of functional abilities after stroke. Carer strain is potentially increased when the patient or carer makes an unrealistic assessment of the patient's level of independence.


Key Words: activities of daily living • caregivers • mood disorders • neuropsychological tests • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M.-H. Chen, C.-L. Hsieh, H.-F. Mao, and S.-L. Huang
Differences between patient and proxy reports in the assessment of disability after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2007; 21(4): 351 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J M A. Visser-Meily, M. W M Post, I. I Riphagen, and E. Lindeman
Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 601 - 623.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. R Tooth, K. T McKenna, and M. Smith
Further evidence for the agreement between patients with stroke and their proxies on the Frenchay Activities Index
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 656 - 665.
[Abstract] [PDF]