Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1999;30:1444-1449

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fürst, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sitzer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fürst, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sitzer, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Other imaging

(Stroke. 1999;30:1444-1449.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Reliability and Validity of Noninvasive Imaging of Internal Carotid Artery Pseudo-Occlusion

Günter Fürst, MD; Andreas Saleh; Frank Wenserski, MD; Jürgen Malms, MD; Mathias Cohnen, MD; Albrecht Aulich, MD; Tobias Neumann-Haefelin, MD; Michael Schroeter, MD; Helmuth Steinmetz, MD Matthias Sitzer, MD

From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology (G.F., A.S., F.W., J.M., M.C., A.A.) and Department of Neurology (T.N.-H., M. Schroeder), Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, and the Department of Neurology (H.S., M. Sitzer), J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Günter Fürst, MD, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail f\|[uuml ]\|rstg{at}uni-duesseldorf.de

Background and Purpose—Our study evaluated noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of atheromatous internal carotid artery (ICA) pseudo-occlusion.

Methods—Twenty patients (17 men, 3 women; mean age ±SD, 64.3±11.6 years) with angiographically proven atheromatous ICA pseudo-occlusion (20 vessels) were prospectively examined with MR angiography (MRA; 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques), color Doppler–assisted duplex imaging (CDDI) and power-flow imaging (PFI) with and without an intravenous ultrasonic contrast agent. As a control group, 13 patients (13 men; mean±SD age, 63.0±9.0 years) with angiographically proven ICA occlusion (13 vessels) were studied with the same techniques. For the determination of interobserver agreement ({kappa} statistics), the findings of each diagnostic technique were read by 2 blinded and independent observers who were not involved in patient recruitment and initial data acquisition. Specificity and sensitivity were calculated for all noninvasive techniques (observer consensus) in comparison to the standard of reference (intra-arterial angiography).

Results—Interobserver reliabilities were {kappa}=0.86 for intra-arterial angiography, {kappa}=0.90 for unenhanced CDDI, {kappa}=0.93 for enhanced CDDI, {kappa}=0.93 for unenhanced PFI, {kappa}=1.0 for enhanced PFI, {kappa}=0.93 for 2D MRA, and {kappa}=0.77 for 3D MRA, respectively (P<0.0001). Specificities and sensitivities were 0.92 and 0.70 for unenhanced CDDI, 0.92 and 0.83 for enhanced CDDI, 0.92 and 0.95 for unenhanced PFI, 1.0 and 0.94 for enhanced PFI, 1.0 and 0.65 for 2D MRA, and 0.89 and 0.47 for 3D MRA, respectively.

Conclusions—Advanced ultrasonographic techniques, especially PFI (with only 1 false-positive diagnosis of occlusion in the present series), can provide reliable and valid data to differentiate between ICA pseudo-occlusion and complete occlusion. In contrast, time-of-flight MRA at its present state is not capable of predicting minimal residual flow within a nearly occluded ICA.


Key Words: angiography, digital subtraction • angiography, magnetic resonance • carotid artery diseases • carotid artery occlusion • contrast media • ultrasonography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
K. Kimura, Y. Iguchi, K. Shibazaki, M. Watanabe, T. Iwanaga, and J. Aoki
M1 Susceptibility Vessel Sign on T2* as a Strong Predictor for No Early Recanalization After IV-t-PA in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, September 1, 2009; 40(9): 3130 - 3132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.G. Choi, D.H. Lee, J.H. Lee, H.W. Pyun, D.W. Kang, S.U. Kwon, J.K. Kim, S.J. Kim, and D.C. Suh
Detection of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Steno-Occlusive Disease with 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Sensitivity Encoding at 3T
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 439 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
B. Thanvi and T. Robinson
Complete occlusion of extracranial internal carotid artery: clinical features, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2007; 83(976): 95 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. Gaitini and M. Soudack
Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis by Doppler Sonography: State of the Art
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2005; 24(8): 1127 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
O. Y. Chernyshev, Z. Garami, S. Calleja, J. Song, M. S. Campbell, E. A. Noser, H. Shaltoni, C.-I Chen, Y. Iguchi, J. C. Grotta, et al.
Yield and Accuracy of Urgent Combined Carotid/Transcranial Ultrasound Testing in Acute Cerebral Ischemia
Stroke, January 1, 2005; 36(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. H. Lev, J. M. Romero, D. N.F. Goodman, R. Bagga, H. Y. K. Kim, N. A. Clerk, R. H. Ackerman, and R. G. Gonzalez
Total Occlusion versus Hairline Residual Lumen of the Internal Carotid Arteries: Accuracy of Single Section Helical CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1123 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. Yoshida, K. Nozaki, K.-i. Kikuta, A. Sadato, S. Miyamoto, and N. Hashimoto
Contrast-Enhanced Carotid Color-Coded Duplex Sonography for Carotid Stenting Follow-Up Assessment
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 992 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Cosottini, A. Pingitore, M. Puglioli, M. C. Michelassi, G. Lupi, A. Abbruzzese, R. Calabrese, M. Lombardi, G. Parenti, and C. Bartolozzi
Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Atherosclerotic Internal Carotid Stenosis as the Noninvasive Imaging Modality in Revascularization Decision Making
Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 660 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
G. Deklunder
Role of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with cerebrovascular disease
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2002; 4(suppl_C): C51 - C55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. M. El-Saden, E. G. Grant, G. M. Hathout, P. T. Zimmerman, S. N. Cohen, and J. D. Baker
Imaging of the Internal Carotid Artery: The Dilemma of Total versus Near Total Occlusion
Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]