(Stroke. 1999;30:1444-1449.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology (G.F., A.S., F.W., J.M., M.C., A.A.) and Department of Neurology (T.N.-H., M. Schroeder), Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, and the Department of Neurology (H.S., M. Sitzer), J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Correspondence to Dr Günter Fürst, MD, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail f\|[uuml ]\|rstg{at}uni-duesseldorf.de
Background and PurposeOur study evaluated noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of atheromatous internal carotid artery (ICA) pseudo-occlusion.
MethodsTwenty patients (17 men, 3 women; mean age ±SD,
64.3±11.6 years) with angiographically proven
atheromatous ICA pseudo-occlusion (20 vessels) were
prospectively examined with MR angiography (MRA; 2D and 3D
time-of-flight techniques), color Dopplerassisted duplex imaging
(CDDI) and power-flow imaging (PFI) with and without an
intravenous ultrasonic contrast agent. As a control group,
13 patients (13 men; mean±SD age, 63.0±9.0 years) with
angiographically proven ICA occlusion (13 vessels) were studied with
the same techniques. For the determination of interobserver agreement
(
statistics), the findings of each diagnostic technique
were read by 2 blinded and independent observers who were not involved
in patient recruitment and initial data acquisition. Specificity and
sensitivity were calculated for all noninvasive techniques (observer
consensus) in comparison to the standard of reference
(intra-arterial angiography).
ResultsInterobserver reliabilities were
=0.86 for
intra-arterial angiography,
=0.90 for unenhanced CDDI,
=0.93 for enhanced CDDI,
=0.93 for unenhanced PFI,
=1.0 for
enhanced PFI,
=0.93 for 2D MRA, and
=0.77 for 3D MRA,
respectively (P<0.0001). Specificities and
sensitivities were 0.92 and 0.70 for unenhanced CDDI, 0.92 and 0.83 for
enhanced CDDI, 0.92 and 0.95 for unenhanced PFI, 1.0 and 0.94 for
enhanced PFI, 1.0 and 0.65 for 2D MRA, and 0.89 and 0.47 for 3D MRA,
respectively.
ConclusionsAdvanced ultrasonographic techniques, especially PFI (with only 1 false-positive diagnosis of occlusion in the present series), can provide reliable and valid data to differentiate between ICA pseudo-occlusion and complete occlusion. In contrast, time-of-flight MRA at its present state is not capable of predicting minimal residual flow within a nearly occluded ICA.
Key Words: angiography, digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance carotid artery diseases carotid artery occlusion contrast media ultrasonography
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kimura, Y. Iguchi, K. Shibazaki, M. Watanabe, T. Iwanaga, and J. Aoki M1 Susceptibility Vessel Sign on T2* as a Strong Predictor for No Early Recanalization After IV-t-PA in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, September 1, 2009; 40(9): 3130 - 3132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.G. Choi, D.H. Lee, J.H. Lee, H.W. Pyun, D.W. Kang, S.U. Kwon, J.K. Kim, S.J. Kim, and D.C. Suh Detection of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Steno-Occlusive Disease with 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Sensitivity Encoding at 3T AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 439 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Thanvi and T. Robinson Complete occlusion of extracranial internal carotid artery: clinical features, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2007; 83(976): 95 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gaitini and M. Soudack Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis by Doppler Sonography: State of the Art J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2005; 24(8): 1127 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Y. Chernyshev, Z. Garami, S. Calleja, J. Song, M. S. Campbell, E. A. Noser, H. Shaltoni, C.-I Chen, Y. Iguchi, J. C. Grotta, et al. Yield and Accuracy of Urgent Combined Carotid/Transcranial Ultrasound Testing in Acute Cerebral Ischemia Stroke, January 1, 2005; 36(1): 32 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Lev, J. M. Romero, D. N.F. Goodman, R. Bagga, H. Y. K. Kim, N. A. Clerk, R. H. Ackerman, and R. G. Gonzalez Total Occlusion versus Hairline Residual Lumen of the Internal Carotid Arteries: Accuracy of Single Section Helical CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1123 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yoshida, K. Nozaki, K.-i. Kikuta, A. Sadato, S. Miyamoto, and N. Hashimoto Contrast-Enhanced Carotid Color-Coded Duplex Sonography for Carotid Stenting Follow-Up Assessment AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 992 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cosottini, A. Pingitore, M. Puglioli, M. C. Michelassi, G. Lupi, A. Abbruzzese, R. Calabrese, M. Lombardi, G. Parenti, and C. Bartolozzi Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Atherosclerotic Internal Carotid Stenosis as the Noninvasive Imaging Modality in Revascularization Decision Making Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 660 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Deklunder Role of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with cerebrovascular disease Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2002; 4(suppl_C): C51 - C55. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. El-Saden, E. G. Grant, G. M. Hathout, P. T. Zimmerman, S. N. Cohen, and J. D. Baker Imaging of the Internal Carotid Artery: The Dilemma of Total versus Near Total Occlusion Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 301 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |