This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Benaim, C. Articles by Pelissier, J. Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Benaim, C. Articles by Pelissier, J. Y. Related Collections Acute Cerebral Infarction Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 1999;30:1862-1868.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Validation of a Standardized Assessment of Postural Control in Stroke Patients

The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)

Charles Benaim, MD; Dominique Alain Pérennou, MD, PhD; Jacqueline Villy; Marc Rousseaux, MD, PhD Jacques Yvon Pelissier, MD

From the Département de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation (C.B., D.A.P., J.V., J.Y.P.), CHU Nîmes, Centre Médical, Nîmes, France; and Service de Rééducation et Convalescence Neurologique (M.R.), CHU Lille, Hôpital Swynghedauw, Lille, France.

Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Charles Benaim, Département de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation, CHU Nîmes, Centre Médical, 30240 Le Grau du Roi, Nîmes, France. E-mail charles.benaim{at}chu-nimes.fr

Background and Purpose—Few clinical tools available for assessment of postural abilities are specifically designed for stroke patients. Most have major floor or ceiling effects, and their metrological properties are not always completely known.

Methods—The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients (PASS), adapted from the BL Motor Assessment, was elaborated in concordance with 3 main ideas: (1) the ability to maintain a given posture and to ensure equilibrium in changing position both must be assessed; (2) the scale should be applicable for all patients, even those with very poor postural performance; and (3) it should contain items with increasing difficulty. This new scale has been validated in 70 patients tested on the 30th and 90th days after stroke onset.

Results—Normative data obtained in 30 age-matched healthy subjects are presented. The PASS meets the following requirements: (1) good construct validity: high correlation with concomitant Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores (r=0.73, P=10^-6), with lower-limb motricity scores (r=0.78, P<10^-6), and with an instrumental measure of postural stabilization (r=0.48, P<10^-2); (2) excellent predictive validity: high correlation between PASS scores on the 30th day and FIM scores on the 90th day (r=0.75, P<10^-6); (3) high internal consistency (Cronbach -coefficient=0.95); and (4) high interrater and test-retest reliabilities (average =0.88 and 0.72).

Conclusions—Our results confirm that the PASS is one of the most valid and reliable clinical assessments of postural control in stroke patients during the first 3 months after stroke.

Key Words: reproducibility of results • prognosis • posture • stroke • hemiplegia

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Blum and N. Korner-Bitensky Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 559 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Verheyden, A. Nieuwboer, L. De Wit, H. Feys, B. Schuback, I. Baert, W. Jenni, W. Schupp, V. Thijs, and W. De Weerdt Trunk performance after stroke: an eye catching predictor of functional outcome J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 78(7): 694 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-M. Chen, C.-L. Hsieh, Sing Kai Lo, L.-J. Liaw, S.-M. Chen, and J.-H. Lin The Test-Retest Reliability of 2 Mobility Performance Tests in Patients With Chronic Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2007; 21(4): 347 - 352. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J Barra, V Chauvineau, T Ohlmann, M Gresty, and D Perennou Perception of longitudinal body axis in patients with stroke: a pilot study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 43 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I V Bonan, K Hubeaux, M C Gellez-Leman, J P Guichard, E Vicaut, and A P Yelnik Influence of subjective visual vertical misperception on balance recovery after stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 49 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-H. Wang, I-P. Hsueh, C.-F. Sheu, and C.-L. Hsieh Discriminative, Predictive, and Evaluative Properties of a Trunk Control Measure in Patients With Stroke Physical Therapy, September 1, 2005; 85(9): 887 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-H. Wang, I-P. Hsueh, C.-F. Sheu, G. Yao, and C.-L. Hsieh Psychometric Properties of 2 Simplified 3-Level Balance Scales Used for Patients With Stroke Physical Therapy, May 1, 2004; 84(5): 430 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-F. Mao, I-P. Hsueh, P.-F. Tang, C.-F. Sheu, and C.-L. Hsieh Analysis and Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Three Balance Measures for Stroke Patients Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 1022 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Wolf, P. A. Catlin, M. Ellis, A. L. Archer, B. Morgan, and A. Piacentino Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2001; 32(7): 1635 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]